group discussion
topic:
Non-debating discussions (SA) >
Books!
Comments
(showing 143-192)
post a comment »
message 192:
by
Lauren, Thefragmentsofmyskullbegintofallonyourtonguelikepixiedust
(new)
Which Star Trek?
Davis wrote: "Oh man, I'm envious. I wish I could get my mind wiped and read them again. "I felt like that after i saw star trek the third time...
message 185:
by
Lauren, Thefragmentsofmyskullbegintofallonyourtonguelikepixiedust
(new)
I READ IN IN 5 DAYS AND I WAS IN KINDERGARTEN!
fastfasterfastest!
Read more!
I just got around to read the Twilight books.I am on book three. They are very much a guilty pleasure lol
message 183:
by
Lauren, Thefragmentsofmyskullbegintofallonyourtonguelikepixiedust
(new)
I READ IN IN 5 DAYS AND I WAS IN KINDERGARTEN!
fastfasterfastest!
ooh, never seen the movie. although i think there are several versions ...but the book is fantastic. i'm reading it for the seventh time! lol
Let's see ...Right now I'm re-reading City of Glass and A Wrinkle in Time, and I'm also reading Skin Hunger.
He's an asshole, I'll give you that warning right now. I agree with some of his stuff, others of it, not so much.
message 168:
by
Lauren, Thefragmentsofmyskullbegintofallonyourtonguelikepixiedust
(new)
Oh, it's here. Trust me.
message 166:
by
Lauren, Thefragmentsofmyskullbegintofallonyourtonguelikepixiedust
(new)
hahaThere is a debate on cybersex here somewhere, but I am not sure where.
message 165:
by
Lauren, Thefragmentsofmyskullbegintofallonyourtonguelikepixiedust
(new)
XDWell, perfect solution.
message 163:
by
Lauren, Thefragmentsofmyskullbegintofallonyourtonguelikepixiedust
(new)
lol. You can't get pregnant over the computer.XD
message 162:
by
Lauren, Thefragmentsofmyskullbegintofallonyourtonguelikepixiedust
(new)
We have a 3000 post thread doing just that.
message 161:
by
Lauren, Thefragmentsofmyskullbegintofallonyourtonguelikepixiedust
(new)
You have NO IDEA. Actually.
message 160:
by
Lauren, Thefragmentsofmyskullbegintofallonyourtonguelikepixiedust
(new)
"Or maybe its just concerned parents who don't want their children listening to 16 year olds detail their active sex lives on an internet debate group, eh?"Not our problem. We don't babysit their kids for them.
"If I were to have kids, I would just not want them to learn about sex from Davis and Kyle discussing their teenage sex lives on goodreads."
Ah, that gave me lulz.
I agree that the media is saturated with sex, but can you blame them? It's what sells, it's what people are interested in.
I don't think that they are very descriptive of it...now, put ur kid in Roleplay and he could learn something, lolz...
I agree. It is something kids should definitely be educated on. Sex is not a negative thing in the least, but I think it is too prevalent in society, the media, and now the web. I think most children are exposed to more than their parents know. If I were to have kids, I would just not want them to learn about sex from Davis and Kyle discussing their teenage sex lives on goodreads.
Paige wrote: "Quick response on that.If they didn't want there kids to read such things, they should monitor what their children are doing. As I take it, the age limit for this website is 13 right? Someone l..."
I agree. However, two things often happen.
1. parents don't know what kids are doing online
2. the parents don't know their kids are online in the first place (kids are smarter and sneakier than their parents think)
And website age limits don't mean a thing -- they are violated all the time.
Not if they're going to allow their child to be blind, and taken advantage of. A kid has a right to know, and they need to learn, if a parent isn't responsible enough to teach them, they should be able to search for answers to their questions.
Marley wrote: "Don't kids have the right to search for information?"
Don't parents have the right to inform their children themselves?
Marley wrote: "They aren't being very good parents if they don't give you any information. I'd rather know now, then figure it out in another way..."
And if the parents don't let kids know what it is and talk to them about it before a certain age than it's their fault. But parents have a right to explain it themselves.
lolz, nice Paige, I'd raher learn about it from yall strangers actually... Mostly because I had a weird sex ed teacher...
They aren't being very good parents if they don't give you any information. I'd rather know now, then figure it out in another way...
Paige wrote: "Quick response on that.
If they didn't want there kids to read such things, they should monitor what their children are doing. As I take it, the age limit for this website is 13 right? Someone l..."
I believe the site's limit is indeed 13.
But there are plenty of parents (that I know, even) that aren't computer savvy, don't have the time, or just don't know how to, or that they should.
Marley wrote: "You just said there's nothing wrong with sex, and then that kids shouldn't be talking about it?"
Parents should be the ones to explain sex to the children, not other children. I didn't know about sex until I was eight. Parents should be allowed to decide when they know. It's their right as guardians.
Davis wrote: "Talking about sex or swearing isn't negative, it's the bullshit Christian morality police... "Or maybe its just concerned parents who don't want their children listening to 16 year olds detail their active sex lives on an internet debate group, eh?
Lauren wrote: "Well, of course, there are bad things that can happen, because life is set up when people want sex the most is when they are least able to handle it. Hormone-crazed teenagers obviously can't handle..."No, there is nothing wrong with sex.
message 144:
by
Lauren, Thefragmentsofmyskullbegintofallonyourtonguelikepixiedust
(new)
And repress every human urge they can.
