group discussion


68 views

topic: Grammar Central > How many do you know?





Comments (showing 1-21)    post a comment »
dateUp_arrow    newest »

message 21: by Gabi (new)

1842007 Well, back atcha!


2524666 Ask and you shall receive.


message 19: by Gabi (new)

1842007 Geez! I only asked!


2524666 I think it is a genus called politianocology.


message 17: by David (new)

1287856 Isn't that Congresscritters?


message 16: by Gabi (new)

1842007 I think it means they revolve around the universe that is themselves and rarely emerge to take notice of anything else.


message 15: by Newengland (new)

730754 I learned solipsistic from that classic solipsist himself, Leo Tolstoy. Come to think of it, MOST writers would come under the dogegory of "solipsist," no?


2524666 Solipsistic was a new one for me,
almost on the verge of megalomania.


message 13: by Tyler (new)

1096417 That's a good one.


message 12: by Newengland (new)

730754 How exzootic.


message 11: by David (new)

1287856 If you like "pandemic" you'll love "epizootic," a disease that is widespread in a non-human animal population.


message 10: by Tyler (new)

1096417 I missed 7 out of 50. It helps me that I know a little philosophy. On the other hand, many of the rest I've only learned in the last five or six years. "Apotheosis" is the last word I figured out.

"Ersatz" is a word I've never had trouble with, but I've heard many people friends get confused over it. Besides swine, I can't believe so many people don't know "glut" or "antebellum"; I think the reason "pandemic" is on the list is that the mass media abuses the word to sensationalize every illness, so people are trying to figure out the difference between it and "epidemic."



message 9: by Gabi (new)

1842007 I know most of them and some I have infererred the meaning from the context in which it was used. But, I have notice that people are using them more and more, probably in protest at the number of people who can't seem to spell at all, or can't be bothered.


message 8: by Summer (new)

227351 Ruth wrote: "...I'm amazed that people never seem to have heard of The Three Little Swine."

That is perplexing. I wonder if that has to do with context. Maybe it was used in a sentence that seemed to infer an alternate meaning.


message 7: by Jonathan (new)

1412037 Newengland wrote: "Same way Big Brother Google knows. ISPs, etc. Except Google stores your searches forever, ready to share with the Feds (or others) if necessary. Not sure about the NYT."

A cautionary tale...




message 6: by Newengland (new)

730754 Same way Big Brother Google knows. ISPs, etc. Except Google stores your searches forever, ready to share with the Feds (or others) if necessary. Not sure about the NYT.


message 5: by Ruth (new)

335159 They've got links to the words and can track when people click for definitions. But damned if I know how they know who.


message 4: by Debbie (new)

686757 Interesting that feckless and fecklessness are both there! I knew parlous, but there were others that were new to me......and interesting too that both swine and pandemic were there.


message 3: by Jonathan (new)

1412037 How do they know who is looking up what?


message 2: by Newengland (last edited Jun 18, 2009 06:09PM) (new)

730754 Wow. A treasure trove of "Words of the Day" there! Sui generis, indeed!


message 1: by Ruth (new)

335159 NYT apparently tracks words that online readers have to look up. How many do you know? I plead guilty to not knowing parlous, but I'm amazed that people never seem to have heard of The Three Little Swine.

http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/06/ny-time...


back to top

unread topics | mark unread