UNIVERSITIES ASLEEP AT THE SWITCH

Here's the FULL 192 page book FREE.

Click link below:

http://www.rbduncan.com/unvrasleep.htm



Can Fitzpatrick be right?

Here's what he says

"We now have the answer Einstein was looking for but this universe is far different from that described by most present science laws. It resembles instead what we see in the quantum world.

If enough universities remain asleep, while one nation puts sufficient time and resources into this new kind of science, then that nation will not only have cheap controllable fusion power with radioactive waste existing only for microseconds instead of millions of years but it will also have enough sophisticated weaponry, to keep the rest of the world as its virtual slaves, for many thousands of years.

This new science tells us that all repetitive geodesic spins and orbits (orbitals) are equivalent to standing waves and matter that is made up of these spins and orbitals must also be considered equivalent to standing waves. Therefore electrons, stars and galaxies are all being repelled, from each other, for the same reason and Ampere's laws plus the gyro precession of all spinning entities tell us why.

Fulbright Scholar Dr. Milo Wolff's brilliant mathematical proof that both the electron and its spin are standing waves with a finite portion (the Hubble limit) of their same frequency surroundings, has fallen on deaf ears and so has Saul Perlmutter's insistence that gravity's equal and opposite repulsive force (Einstein's cosmological constant) exists, holding all the stars and galaxies apart.
These two scientists have given us the final pieces of the master puzzle that show us this is indeed a simple universe and one does not have to be a math expert to see it either.

Scientists before them have given us other important pieces of the puzzle and they too have been mostly ignored by the universities.

Kurt Goedel proved that if we were confined in a subset realm---like here on earth---without being able to see out far enough then we might believe that our science laws were universal truths when this would be far from the truth and this is exactly what has happened.

Berkeley, then Mach then Maxwell all told us surroundings were involved (Mach's principle) but since this did not mix well with present science and made the math too difficult, it was simply given lip service and largely ignored by the universities. Now, thanks to Dr. Milo Wolff, we know it's same frequency surroundings that are involved and we have computers, coming on line, that can do these calculations.

If the Principle of Equivalence states we cannot discern gravity from an accelerating, contraction then it also means that we cannot discern the Einstein-Perlmutter repulsive force out there, between all the stars and galaxies, from an accelerating, expanding universe. So we are really in a balanced, steady state universe---similar to the microcosm---which is the opposite of what these universities have been preaching to us for the past 90 years.

Dirac predicted that one day we would be able to see an approximation of how it all worked and how true this becomes. The basic building blocks of this universe are simple standing waves but this fact is totally obscured by all our subset, local science laws.

It turns out that Ampere gave us the first universal true laws in the 1820s, showing us how it all worked, and we should have listened to him but we listened to Faraday instead. Ampere described these invisible forces using relative motion laws while Faraday used fields. You must use relative motion to easily unify the forces because motion is the only common element. You cannot easily unify sundry fields.

Gravity could not be caused by relative motion, printed the university presses, because we would see interference fringes and we don't. What they didn't realize was that while magnetism is caused by the electron's spin, gravity is caused by the quark's spin and we have no receptors to see any fringes at that frequency, which is the square of the electron spin frequency; hence E = mc^2.

The Michaelson Moreley experiment, over a hundred years ago, showed us something was radically wrong with our concept of motion. With this new approach we now know what motion really is, in this universe of standing waves, and the parameters in which it can be safely used. Motion in one frequency spin/orbit system space time realm is far different from motion in a different frequency spin/orbit system space time realm.

Quantum scientists understand this. That is why QED uses different math and rules from QCD. They also understand that the strength of these individual binding energy forces does not vary with distance. It is merely the number of these individual bondings that decrease with the square of the distance.

Ampere's laws also immediately show you the unification of magnetic attractions and sigma and pi chemical bondings. And the standing wave action, which is the basis for these laws, show us why we have motion, space and time and even life itself because things that reproduce stay here and things that don't, don't.

Standing waves utilize the energy of their same frequency surroundings to reproduce themselves and stay here.

In radio we constantly look for ways to eliminate all the standing waves we can but in this universe it's just the opposite and this universe uses them as its master building blocks."

And this is but a fraction of what is in Fitzpatrick's revolutionary, new book UNIVERSITIES ASLEEP AT THE SWITCH.

And for the very latest SCIENCE Sensation: you can click this link: http://www.rbduncan.com/lisi.htm