FITZPATRICK's MODEL: or How We Have To Look At Our Universe

We must visualize our entire universe as Spinning Scalar Standing Wave Resonances, which are (Quarks) inside of orbiting lower frequency SSSWRs (Electrons), which themselves are inside of orbiting lower frequency SSSWRs (Our Solar System), which is inside of orbiting lower frequency SSSWRs (Galaxies), which are inside of orbiting lower frequency SSSWRs (Super Clusters) ad infinitum in both lower and higher frequency directions.

And we must look at these as obeying only one law -- our in phase, out of phase rule -- which we can more easily see as relative motion in these separate spin/orbit frequency realms.

We are not exactly dismissing all new theoretical science and returning to the Halcyon days of Niels Bohr because we understand it is not motion but our phase differences that really determine spacetime.

Since we are tuned to the electron's spin orbital frequency (shown to us by Planck's constant h) then all frequencies higher than this (h) will be seen by us as point sized (dimensionless).

Any conglomerations of these dimensionless points of matter -- our h frequency -- we will see as solids.

By the same token, all frequencies lower than this (h) will be seen by us as larger (galaxies) and even lower frequencies, than that, will be seen by us as even larger super clusters.

We are tuned in to these frequencies similarly to the way a superheterodyne radio receiver is tuned to the frequency that it receives.



The Mysteries are then explained:

Why are stars that are further from us in space also further from us in time?

Because, as Dr. Milo Wolff has pointed out, it is the wave density that determines spacetime. The same wave density will be between both spin frequency phase shift (that determines space) and the principal scalar frequency phase shift (that determines time). If one is separated by a certain wave density then the other must be too unless force is involved. And the forces between all the stars are balanced in a steady state universe.



Why can't anything go faster than the speed of light?

Under this New Concept the question must be rephrased as: Why can't anything composed of atoms and molecules, or even the electron component thereof, go faster than the speed of light?

First we must ascertain exactly what speed is: The whole concept of speed is arbitrary and capricious because there is nothing in this entire universe, microcosm or macrocosm, that remains at rest. So what can you measure speed against?

What we are actually doing in physics, as we measure speed, is measuring the displacement of translational motion of the spinning quarks -- if we are measuring the speed of atoms and molecules and things built from atoms and molecules.

It takes force to displace this translational motion of these quarks a certain amount.

Acceleration is a continued displacement of the translational motion of these quarks that build atoms and molecules.

The more this displacement then the higher the inertial force.

When you look at the speedometer on your car it is only telling you how fast the car is going down the highway. It is not telling you how fast the highway and the earth are going, as fast as a cannon-ball, around the sun because you don't care about that anyway. It doesn't affect your driving. That is speed too but in this instance we only want to know the difference between your car's speed and the road. This is easy to measure by measuring the force that it takes to displace the translational motion of the quarks or what we understand in physics as inertial force.

Exerting this inertial force, by either spinning faster or speeding faster, is like pushing against a strong spring and the graph for this force is not a straight line but an assymptotic curve. To go twice the speed you must exert slightly more than twice the energy. The reason that nothing can go faster than the speed of light is that it would take all the energy available in this entire universe just to move the smallest atom at this theoretical speed of light.



Why do we have plus and minus charge?

For the same reason, essentially, that you have positive and negative attractions in magnetism, because of relative motion (phase shift).

But that phase shift for magnetism is at the electron's spin frequency where the phase shift for charge is at the electron's orbital frequency, which is a lower frequency.

In both charge and magnetism it's more space than average being repulsion and less space than average being attraction. And this is the same as in the tensor math of general relativity.

For Chapter 8. Click this link: http://www.goodreads.com/story/show/6491...