OUR AMAZING RESONANT UNIVERSE (first publication - here at Goodreads) - Saul Perlmutter's Contribution (chapter 4) by Daniel Jr.
chapters
chapter 2:
A Paridigm Shift
chapter 4:
Saul Perlmutter's Contribution
chapter 5:
What Our Scientists DON'T See
chapter 7:
How We Have To Look At Our Universe
chapter 10:
Why this model is so important
Saul Perlmutter's Contribution
chapter 4
—
updated Nov 16, 2007
—
3206 characters
—
2 people liked this writing
—
1 review of this writing
By 1997 things were finally all falling into place in this concept that I had first started over 30 years before, but I lacked something:
If the Principle of Equivalence showed gravity could not be discerned from acceleration, then why didn't this opposite force of gravity, that I saw existed, not also have some form of acceleration associated with it?
It was Saul Perlmutter who showed me it did!
Saul Perlmutter headed the group that was first to discover this acceleration in this supposedly expanding universe.
My God! I thought. What could be simpler than that.
And then I could hardly believe what I was reading when Saul Perlmutter, himself, stated that we were back to square one again with Einstein's original cosmological constant, a force out there equal but opposite to gravity that was holding all the stars and galaxies apart.
This could only mean one thing: This has to be a balanced universe! And I had been harping on this very thing now for over 30 years. We are in a steady state universe!
Because: if there is this force out there that Einstein called his cosmological constant (a repulsive force equal but opposite to gravity) then -- because of the Principle of Equivalence -- we would not be able to discern it from an accelerating, expansion.
How simple an explanation!
How unique!
It is the quark spin force that is the square of the electron spin frequency that gives us gravity, inertia and this Principle of Equivalence.
And it is this same quark spin repulsive force on the opposite side, of gravity, that gives us Einstein's cosmological constant as well.
Planck's constant h and h/pi (h-bar) are both telling us that we live in this space time realm of the electron's orbital motion and spin motion. We are tuned to this particular frequency band!
We therefore see this out of phase situation (space), that these electron spins are producing, as space.
Since we have no similar constant for the quark then this tells us that we are not specifically tuned to this quark spin frequency and cannot see this extra quark produced space, as space. We must see this, extra amount of quark space, instead as acceleration.
I've been in radio all my life and there is no doubt whatsoever in my mind that we, like any radio or TV receiver are only tuned to one band and that is to the electron spin/orbital frequency.
We are set up much like the ordinary superheterodyne radio receiver circuitry.
Yes, my good friend Dr. Milo Wolff is absolutely right.
We are part of a frequency or wave universe; we are part of a scalar, standing wave universe!
Oh yes, I almost forgot to tell you the most important thing about standing waves:
Standing waves reproduce themselves!
This means that this quality of reproduction may also be inherited by the complicated things these standing waves build into -- like us.
For Chapter 5. Click this link: http://www.goodreads.com/story/show/6491...
Did you like this?
vote
(2 people liked this writing)


