Here are 3 different schools of thought about how fast gravity acts.

1. Many scientists believe gravity acts instantly. Newton taught this.

2. Many scientists believe gravity acts at the speed of light. Einstein taught this.

3. Many scientists believe gravity acts above the speed of light but not quite instantly. This is what Van Flandern http://www.ldolphin.org/vanFlandern/grav... (link) is saying now. He's probably right because light has aberration and gravity doesn't which has to mean gravity is acting faster than light.

The speed of light is 300,000,000 meters per second or 3 times
10^9 meters per second which would be written 3x10^9 meters/sec.

What I'm trying to put forth in this paper is that gravity and
inertia both act, faster than light, at what we see as 9x10^18 meters/sec and this would be in line with what Tom Van Flandern is saying. It would also account for the factor of c^2 (c squared) that keeps creeping up in our math.

I need to remind you, at this point, that I'm limited in the amount of words here at Goodreads so this paper has to be greatly minimized. You do need to read these links, and the other things I have written, to get the full picture of this brand new concept being put forth here.

Most agree, magnetism is caused by the electron spin frequency. If the quark spin frequency is the square of the electron spin frequency then we have not only the reason for the strong force but gravity and inertia can be seen as strong force leakage that we will see as acceleration. Thus, this gives the reason for the Principle of Equivalence. And with this you also get the reason that a star will bend light (because light then will be a lower harmonic of the gravitational frequency). Even Einstein saw light as a wave (frequency). So this explains too many things not to be so.

Now we have two schools of thought on whether light is a wave or a particle. It behaves like both.

But Dr. Milo Wolff has recently mathematically proven that the
electron is a scalar, standing wave.

So it seems that the electron -- clearly a particle -- behaves as both too.

If we listen closely to these Feynman lectures
http://www.vega.org.uk/series/lectures/f... (link) you will see that the electron seems not to be here most of the time. It's gone most of the time. And this is exactly
what we would notice if Dr. Milo Wolff is right. These standing waves would act like movie picture frames with the quark sending us faster movie frames than the electron but yet resonating with the electron's slower movie frame rate.

In generating radio frequencies we are constantly plagued with
standing waves that are always generated with any kind of a radio transmitter. Standing waves do not radiate and they waste power so we try to eliminate them. In this universe it's just the opposite and this universe uses them to build with.

Since these waves, in the universe, come from the surroundings in all directions -- they are scalar -- and they will take a more or less spherical form and they will have spin.

Milo Wolff first discovered that the electron was a scalar, standing wave then later he discovered the electron's spin frequency was also a scalar, standing wave. Both of these -- electron frequency and spin frequency -- depend on the energy of all surrounding electrons out to the Hubble limit, which is a finite number of surrounding electrons.

Here now is the reason for Mach's principle, gravity and inertia. You see this once you realize that the quark too has a spin frequency and is also a scalar, standing wave entity with a finite number of surrounding quarks supporting it.

So the conclusion that we have to come to in this paper is that each electron is composed of standing wave frames, at even a higher frequency, that spin, precess and build a spherical, standing wave electron that gets its power from similar surrounding electrons.

Once you see that Ampere's Laws http://www.rbduncan.com/Ampere (link) work in the microcosm as well as in the macrocosm then you see the reason that the spin frequency of all these entities create space and all of them together will give an average amount of space.

Force then become either more space than average -- a repulsive force -- or less space than average -- an attractive force. This is exactly the way the tensor math of general relativity deals with it because there are only tensors for space. There are no tensors for force in tensor math.

Why do Ampere's Laws work? http://www.rbduncan.com/theALaws.htm (link)

Look closely. It must be a phase relationship!

Time is caused by a scalar entity's principal frequency but space is dependent on its spin frequency.

The further out of phase two entities are to each other's principal frequency, the more time that will exist between them.

The closer in phase two entities are to each other's principal frequency, the less time that will exist between them.

But space is related to the spin frequency:

More space than average -- repulsive force -- is being produced between items the more they are out of phase with each other's spin frequency.

Less space than average -- attractive force -- is being produced between items the closer they are in phase with each other's spin frequency.

For Chapter 4. click this link: http://www.goodreads.com/story/show/6491?chapter=4