An airline owner once told me, "I can get all the shop specialists I want but good line mechanics, that can fix various airliner problems, are awful hard to find."

Not only that but you can have a shop specialist turning out productive work in a few weeks but it takes far longer than a few weeks to become productive solving airliner problems out on the line.

Out on the line was where I excelled because I had my pilot license, my aircraft and engine mechanic licenses, the top radio license and my bachelor of science degree. I have only met one other person with all four of those, in my travels through life, and he too worked on the line fixing various airliner problems.

A person must know all the various systems on an airliner if he attempts to be productive in fixing things on a modern airliner.

Every airline has a system set up where the line folks can get opinions from the top shop specialists and lines of communications are set up so that troubles can be quickly solved. In an airline, people who specialize on different things do talk to each other and they must talk to the line crews that are having problems with the entire airplane.

A modern airliner is nowhere near as complicated as our universe, yet we have all these science specialists, who specialize in their own different fields with their own different schools of thought, and, as far as scientists go, I've had a hard time even getting them to talk to one another if they have to do even the slightest bit of different thinking or use different math that lies in the other fellow's school of thought.

I'll spell out these different schools of thought throughout this paper.

In this paper of mine, I'm going to place here before you various opinions of various specialists -- who I can't even get to talk to each other because their schools of thought differ so much -- but you will see, I hope, this all eventually adds up to a workable system where all four fundamental forces actually get unified. This might be hard for many people to believe, because it's the Holy Grail of science, but I believe it's true. You will have to make your own decision based on the facts I'm presenting here.

None of these ideas are mine! I'm simply combining these ideas from top people, each who specialize in an entirely different school of thought. I'll give credit to each where credit is due.

So all I'm doing is what I used to do while working for the airlines: I'm getting all the necessary specialists on the horn so I can get this airliner flying. Or really, so I can get these four fundamental forces unified and see how this universe is really built.

We use different field laws now for each fundamental force. For instance: We use different math and rules in QCD when we study quarks and the strong force than we do in QED when we study electrons and the magnetic force because QCD and QED have entirely different fields. This is no good! Because in each different field there are not only different schools of thought but entirely different types of math!

There's entirely too much disparity here!

Therefore let's forget fields and look at relative motion which must be the same in each realm whereas the fields, as we see them, are not.

We'll talk more about motion and the various schools of thought about motion in the microcosm later but right now I want to emphasize that Niels Bohr won the Nobel Prize for showing us that different colors of light were obtained via different motions, of the electron, in the microcosm. We can see these effects of motion in the microcosm as different colors, so we know some form of motion is there. Since we have motion here as well, let's start using motion to unify these fundamental invisible forces. Nothing else in common exists!

Einstein tried, unsuccessfully, to unify the fundamental forces with math. Let's see if we can do it, using Feynman's suggestion, with motion.

So the first expert I want to introduce you to is Nobel Prize winner Richard Feynman. Please click this http://www.rbduncan.com/feynm1.htm (link) to see what Feynman has to say about motion in his famous QED.

I'd been using Ampere's Laws, http://www.rbduncan.com/Ampere (link) ever since I heard about them. I found Ampere's motion laws to be far better than the field concept, which seemed to me far too complicated to be useful in fast electrical trouble-shooting. Not only that but with these relative motion laws you could always easily see which way the electron was spinning whereas with field laws you couldn't. Many times this made all the difference in the world, where I solved problems others couldn't.

I was fixing radios even before I entered high school and I spotted the right tools to use early in the game. I immediately saw that using Ampere's relative motion laws gave me a distinct advantage over others who used Faraday's field laws to trouble-shoot.

Then, while working on an RCA RADAR Indicator one day at Pan American Airlines, I saw how these slightly modified laws of Ampere http://www.rbduncan.com/aufbaulaws.htm (link) were also showing me how to unify the fields as Einstein tried to do and I wrote about this in my first book in 1967 http://www.rbduncan.com/pge1.html (link) getting approval from Lincoln Barnett but getting blasted by Bob Dicke.

It wasn't until 1997 that I saw the reason Dicke was wrong. It has taken considerable time to work this all out. In fact, I'm still learning!

For Chapter 3. click this link: http://www.goodreads.com/story/show/6491?chapter=3