Elisa Rolle's Reviews > The Lonely War

The Lonely War by Alan Chin
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
2156728
's review
Nov 09, 10

Read from February 26 to November 09, 2010

The Lonely War was for sure a complex and sometime too much involving novel to read (and not only since it’s almost 500 pages long); I was pulled and pushed by it, especially from the second part on: pulled since I really loved Andrew Waters’ character and pushed since I was expecting, and realizing page after page, that he would not have a traditional happy ending.

I will not spend time describing the setting, the story, rewriting a blurb, all of this can be found on the publisher website or in other reviews, I want to explain why this novel was so involving for me that more than one time I needed to stop and re-reading sentences, since my mind was wondering on its own direction, letting painful memories take over the story. What you are reading is not a review, unless you don’t want to consider the factor that only a powerful novel is able to do that, to suck you into the story so much that you loose yourself into it.

More than one reader told me this novel has a bittersweet ending, but sincerely I don’t agree with them, this novel has probably the only possible happy ending considering it’s set in the mid-late ’40 and with one main character, Andrew, that is an Asia-American man. Asia-American man and gay in the US at the end of the '40 - beginning of the '50? I don’t want to give too much of a spoiler so please stop reading here if you don’t want to be spoiled, but

---

how much realistic it would have been if Andrew had returned home after the war to live happily ever after with another man? It would not be possible, and Andrew undoubtedly would have been unhappy, maybe not immediately, but surely in time, and probably not only unhappy, but also alone. The ending Alan Chin decided to give to the story is the only one possible, and with this perspective, for me it’s also a good one, in my mind I can imagine Andrew being, maybe not fully happy, but at least in peace.

The only concern I have is exactly on the last sentence of the postscript “he (Mitchell) realized that instant had never occurred” and even before, in the last paragraph of the last chapter:
"Okay. I'll stay with you until spring."
He (Andrew) felt a spark of intensity flare up within his being, and he desperately wanted the winter to stretch on forever.
I actually re-read three time both last chapter and the postscript, trying to understand what actually the ending was, and in the end, I think the author wanted to give us 2 options: if the reader has a more romantic core, he/she will read this ending as an happily one for Andrew, he fought his “mal de vivre” and he found a reason to continue in the people around him who loved him; if the reader has a more realistic core, he/she will read this ending with a more bitter taste. But since I’m a romantic at heart, I don’t want to think to the possible meaning of the postscript, I want to focus on that “spark of intensity” that flares up within Andrew’s being, giving him a reason to fight against everything happened to him, and maybe even against his own heart.

When I was young I loved so much the war novels, because it was an history I can reconnect to, my grandfather used to talk about the war, my same parents were children when the II WW was still on, and a lingering memoir of those events still was in the air. I stopped to love them since it was not often I found an HEA, most of the time, one of the character was left behind, mourning the loss of his/her beloved one. With this perspective, I’m happy to have read The Lonely War, it’s an heartbreaking novel, but I’m not sure I will be able to read it again (as I’m not sure I will be able to see again The Pianist or The Schindler List or Empire of the Sun): they are all artworks (and yes, art is a necessary definition) calling to much to my heart, and I need to protect it. For this reason I want to think to Andrew and that spring that will never come, letting the winter last forever.

And now out of the review, so please don’t consider it as a parameter to decide if you want to read or not this novel, this is my personal experience, but I will explain why I need to protect my heart from this novel and from that last sentence: my father was a man of summer, he enjoyed the sea, the nature, the possibility to living outdoor; he was raised in the city, during war time, and his only escape from a life of poverty and work (he started to work at 9 years old) was to go fishing near the sea, on the delta of a big river. He could do that only in spring and summer, and sometime he stretched it until autumn, but winter was out of question, it was too cold. It was not the fishing itself that pulled to my father, but the possibility to escape a reality that was too much hurting for him. When he was diagnosed with cancer, he was given 3, maximum 4 months of life: it was the December of 1990; my father fought the cancer with all his strength, he wanted to live for me, my brother and my mother, and he wanted to live since he was only 51 years old and he had a life in front of him. On November 1993, almost 3 years after the diagnosis, the pain was indescribable, and my father still refused to take the morphine since he didn’t want to loose the connection with his life, with us and the rest of the world. But the winter came and he was forced to come back home, far from the river and inside an house in the city. One of the last things he said to my mother was, looking outside to our yard garden that was starting to blossom with the new year flowers, “if I manage to be alive coming next spring, I will manage to live another year.” My father died on March 18, 1994. I want to think that for Andrew things went differently, that the spark was strong enough to let him live through the another and another and another winter.

http://www.amazon.com/dp/1934841447/?...
3 likes · likeflag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Lonely War.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-4 of 4) (4 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

Emanuela ~plastic duck~ I am a romantic. I can't believe that the Andrew of the beginning of the book lost himself so much that he refused to live, I can't reconcile the two images. I want to believe that renouncing Nathan was enough to atone for whatever he thought he did wrong and to put him on the right path again. But you are right, absolutely, the doubt lingers. Now I'll copy and paste all this in my review, it's a coherent thought, lol


message 2: by Elisa (new) - added it

Elisa Rolle Emanuela ~Zstyx~ wrote: "I am a romantic. I can't believe that the Andrew of the beginning of the book lost himself so much that he refused to live, I can't reconcile the two images. I want to believe that renouncing Natha..."

Emanuela, dear, is it a coincidence you leave this comment right this day? If it's not thank you, if it's, for me it's another proof that I have an angel somewhere ;-) In any case Alan Chin himself told me Andrew was at a spring wedding, so he managed to come out from his depression (if we can call it depression...)


Emanuela ~plastic duck~ Yes, it is a coincidence, because I read it and totally forgot about it, how rude of me. (((Hugs)))


message 4: by Emanuela ~plastic duck~ (last edited Mar 18, 2011 04:38AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Emanuela ~plastic duck~ I mean, I forgot about the date, not what you wrote (((Hugs again)))


back to top