<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	<review>
  <id>907574</id>
    <user>
    <id>68473</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Samuel]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Eugene, OR]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/68473-samuel]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1177566124p3/68473.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1177566124p2/68473.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">724089</id>
  <isbn>0226675459</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780226675459</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1177648673m/724089.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1177648673s/724089.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/724089.The_Reasoning_Voter_Communication_and_Persuasion_in_Presidential_Campaigns</link>
  <average_rating>3.50</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>10</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[&lt;div&gt;<em>The Reasoning Voter</em> is an insider's look at campaigns, candidates, media, and voters that convincingly argues that voters make informed logical choices. Samuel L. Popkin analyzes three primary campaigns&#8212;Carter in 1976; Bush and Reagan in 1980; and Hart, Mondale, and Jackson in 1984&#8212;to arrive at a new model of the way voters sort through commercials and sound bites to choose a candidate. Drawing on insights from economics and cognitive psychology, he convincingly demonstrates that, as trivial as campaigns often appear, they provide voters with a surprising amount of information on a candidate's views and skills. For all their shortcomings, campaigns <em>do</em> matter.<br/><br/>&quot;If you're preparing to run a presidential campaign, and only have time to read one book, make sure to read Sam Popkin's <em>The Reasoning Voter</em>. If you have time to read two books, read <em>The Reasoning Voter</em> twice.&quot;&#8212;James Carville, Senior Stategist, Clinton/Gore '92<br/><br/>&quot;A fresh and subtle analysis of voter behavior.&quot;&#8212;Thomas Byrne Edsall,  <em>New York Review of Books</em><br/>&quot;Professor Popkin has brought V.O. Key's contention that voters are rational into the media age. This book is a useful rebuttal to the cynical view that politics is a wholly contrived business, in which unscrupulous operatives manipulate the emotions of distrustful but gullible citizens. The reality, he shows, is both more complex and more hopeful than that.&quot;&#8212;David S. Broder, <em>The Washington Post</em>&lt;/div&gt;]]>
  </description>
<authors>
    <author>
    <id>385130</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Samuel L. Popkin]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/385130.Samuel_L_Popkin]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.58</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>19</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>1</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>  <published>1994</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="social-sciences" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Apr 26 21:37:57 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Apr 26 21:37:57 -0700 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/907574]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/907574]]></link>
</review>

</GoodreadsResponse>