Kemper's Reviews > Starting Over: Why the Last Decade Was so Damn Rotten and Why the Next One Will Surely Be Better

Starting Over by Andy Serwer
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
405390
's review
Feb 09, 2010

did not like it
bookshelves: non-fiction, craptacular

At the end of the year, Time Magazine did a cover story on The Decade from Hell. It was an interesting article, and I noticed while reading that the writer had this book out. I assumed that the book had been written and that Time had asked the author to make a summary out of it to do the article. Since I liked the article and think that 2000-2010 will indeed go down as the decade that sucked hairy gorilla testicles and am interested in reading more about why, I reserved it from the library.

Imagine my surprise when I went to pick up the book and saw that it was only 96 pages long. And if you throw out the intro, acknowledgements and a page eating timeline that consumes about 30 pages, you’re down to less than 50 very short pages of content. And as near as I can tell, the book IS the article.

Is there a more perfect way to sum up the miserable decade than this? To be expecting an in-depth analysis of all the things that made those years so craptacular only to find out that it was a bait-and-switch tactic to sell the article (which is still available free on-line) in book form? It’s as if Bernie Madoff has gone into publishing. I’m just glad I didn’t order from Amazon and spend the $15 on it or I would have been really peeved.

As content goes, it’s a good magazine article. It’s not much of a book since it’s long on generalizations and short on facts and analysis. If you want to read it, just check out this link and save yourself $15 or a trip to the library.

http://www.time.com/time/nation/artic...
2 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Starting Over.
Sign In »

Comments (showing 1-2 of 2) (2 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Georg (new)

Georg Good issue for law students. Can it really be leggaly forbidden to "steal" that book?


Kemper Georg wrote: "Good issue for law students. Can it really be leggaly forbidden to "steal" that book?"

I scrolled through the article and they did add just a little to the book version. (And I do mean a little.) But that's probably how they're justifying the book version and protecting it copyright wise.


back to top