<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	<review id="8857301">
    <user id="160329">
    <name><![CDATA[Kevin]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/160329-kevin]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="fantasy" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[Tolkien Enthusiasts]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 -0800 2002</read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Nov 08 16:42:42 -0800 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Nov 08 16:46:11 -0800 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Although you will find many detractors from David Day's work, it has come to my attention that this book is 100% accurate.<br/><br/>Many people who claim that David Day's compilation is &quot;trash&quot;, are those who insist that he makes up entries to satisfy white space.<br/><br/>This could not be further from the truth.  Being a Tolkien enthusiast, I have done a great deal of searching throughout Tolkien's books, letters, and notations made by Christopher Tolkien.  In my search, I have found evidence of direct citations used by David Day.<br/><br/>If you enjoy Tolkien, and do not have time to search appendicies, Tolkien's letters, or Tolkien's notations (both J.R.R. and Christopher), then I suggest you purchase this book.  This book is on the money, and there is a reason why Christopher Tolkien has not decried David Day's work - because David Day did his research.]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/8857301]]></url>
</review>

</GoodreadsResponse>