Catie's Reviews > A Wrinkle in Time
A Wrinkle in Time (Time, #1)
by Madeleine L'Engle
by Madeleine L'Engle
Catie's review
bookshelves: favorite-books, children-s, classics, sci-fi, series, middle-grade, me-and-the-girls
Mar 17, 12
bookshelves: favorite-books, children-s, classics, sci-fi, series, middle-grade, me-and-the-girls
Read from March 10 to 17, 2012, read count: 3
Madeleine L’Engle famously said, “You have to write the book that wants to be written. And if the book will be too difficult for grown-ups, then you write it for children.” I fell in love with this book when I was eight, and since then I’ve read it countless times. This is a book about physics, faith, God, and the constant fight for good. And it’s written for children with no apologies.
The manuscript for this book was notoriously rejected by many major publishers, who believed its content would be too advanced for young readers. And now, fifty years later, this book frequently finds its way onto “banned” and “challenged” books lists. It contains descriptions of multi-dimensional travel right alongside biblical passages. L’Engle dares to mention Jesus, Bhudda, and Einstein together in a list of humans who have fought for good. In a time when it seems like the vast majority of right-wing religious leaders are convinced that science is the antithesis of faith, this book is revolutionary.
L’Engle writes about faith – “a willing suspension of disbelief” in a Christian setting, but in a way that’s applicable to anyone. The Murry’s have faith in Charles Wallace, even though they don’t always understand him.
“Just because we don’t understand doesn’t mean that an explanation doesn’t exist.”
Calvin has faith in his gut feelings, his “compulsions.” He has faith that he and the Murry’s were meant to meet.
”When I get this feeling, this compulsion, I always do what it tells me. I can’t explain where it comes from or how I get it, and it doesn’t happen very often. But I obey it.”
Mrs. Murry has faith that her husband will come home. And the three children are able to suspend disbelief and place their trust in Mrs. Whatsit.
“I don’t understand it any more than you do, but one thing I’ve learned is that you don’t have to understand things for them to be.”
Spending time with these characters is like coming home. Meg Murry has been my literary soul mate – stubborn, straightforward, and difficult – for over twenty years. Calvin was undoubtedly one of my first ever fictional crushes, and Charles Wallace will always be my little brother.
This line: “Charles. Charles, I love you. My baby brother who always takes care of me.” will always make me cry.
Stop by The Readventurer today for a highly scientific comparison (complete with sophisticated artist renderings!) of the book and the movie. (Hint: Flannery’s suggested alternate title for the movie is: A Wrinkle of Crap.)
The manuscript for this book was notoriously rejected by many major publishers, who believed its content would be too advanced for young readers. And now, fifty years later, this book frequently finds its way onto “banned” and “challenged” books lists. It contains descriptions of multi-dimensional travel right alongside biblical passages. L’Engle dares to mention Jesus, Bhudda, and Einstein together in a list of humans who have fought for good. In a time when it seems like the vast majority of right-wing religious leaders are convinced that science is the antithesis of faith, this book is revolutionary.
L’Engle writes about faith – “a willing suspension of disbelief” in a Christian setting, but in a way that’s applicable to anyone. The Murry’s have faith in Charles Wallace, even though they don’t always understand him.
“Just because we don’t understand doesn’t mean that an explanation doesn’t exist.”
Calvin has faith in his gut feelings, his “compulsions.” He has faith that he and the Murry’s were meant to meet.
”When I get this feeling, this compulsion, I always do what it tells me. I can’t explain where it comes from or how I get it, and it doesn’t happen very often. But I obey it.”
Mrs. Murry has faith that her husband will come home. And the three children are able to suspend disbelief and place their trust in Mrs. Whatsit.
“I don’t understand it any more than you do, but one thing I’ve learned is that you don’t have to understand things for them to be.”
Spending time with these characters is like coming home. Meg Murry has been my literary soul mate – stubborn, straightforward, and difficult – for over twenty years. Calvin was undoubtedly one of my first ever fictional crushes, and Charles Wallace will always be my little brother.
This line: “Charles. Charles, I love you. My baby brother who always takes care of me.” will always make me cry.
Stop by The Readventurer today for a highly scientific comparison (complete with sophisticated artist renderings!) of the book and the movie. (Hint: Flannery’s suggested alternate title for the movie is: A Wrinkle of Crap.)
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read A Wrinkle in Time.
sign in »
Comments (showing 1-18 of 18) (18 new)
date
newest »
newest »
I love that quote! She was so completely brilliant. There's an interview that she did with Newsweek (you can google it, or I linked it in my book vs. movie today) in 2004 that's just AMAZING. You should definitely look it up and read it. She talks a lot about faith.I don't know why everyone thinks that science and religion can't go together either! I love authors like her, who find "the happy medium." :)
I don't know where people get HALF of their weird tendencies about religion because lots of people say and believe things for "religious reasons" that aren't remotely Biblically accurate (from the Christian POV). It seems like some theologian I read once (most likely CS Lewis because I've read him more than anyone else or maybe even one of my profs at college) said something like there's a place for religion and there's a place for science. If you're sick you might go to the preacher for prayer but you're going to go to the doctor for answers. The Bible is not meant to explain the science of the world, it's meant to explain something beyond this world. To me people seem to get caught up in trying to "prove" things which really defeats the whole purpose of "faith".
I'm behind on blogs from my vacation but I'll definitely have to check that article out.
Yes! Isn't that the point of faith? That you don't need proof? And alternately, I think that it's silly when when religious leaders promote pseudo-science like intelligent design. Why? You should definitely read her interview. It was blowing my mind last night. She was so brilliant.
Oh I will! I just have to unpack and do all that post-vacation stuff today as well. I'm okay with some intelligent design theory (because at least it acknowledges science's existence) but what I don't understand is people who don't believe in micro-evolution (not macro) when it's happened in recent history. Also I really don't get why it matters. For me that's the biggie: Why care so much about issues that are NOT pertinent?
(My personal Biblical misunderstanding pet peeve is the anti-alcohol perspective. That I could talk on for ages).
I think it's arguable whether intelligent design acknowledges science's existence, LOL. :PBut I agree with you - why focus on the little details?
Haha, I'm sure you could! I still can't believe that your county just came out of prohibition!
Well the way intelligent design was explained to me in college (as I remember) was something like "If evolution happened who's to say God wasn't in control of that? Evolution does not exclude the existence/creation of God" or I could be remembering a different theory because college was awhile ago and it was just one course. I was okay with the compromise because I'm naturally always for the middle ground. Oh it wasn't my county. Just my town within the city limits! And trust me I have a particular co-worker who is very displeased. I always just tell people "I want wine as good as Jesus made" and what can you really say to that? The town north of us (where everyone thought it would pass) stayed dry as did the town south of us. So we will soon have ALL their residents buying alcohol in my town and leaving their money with us.
Here's the wikipedia article - who knows how unbiased it is, though.What you said in your first paragraph, I absolutely agree with - but I don't think that fits with intelligent design as I understand it.
Ha! I bet they're all stumped when you say that. That's a Mattie Ross strategy, right there. :)
I must be remembering a different theory. We discussed quite a few different theories (being at a Christian college). But honestly I can't recall all the details. That's going to bug me now (but I didn't keep my biology notes/books so it'll just have to bug me). It stumps most people. I think it makes some of them mad but I really don't care. People need to learn to think for themselves and not just believe what they think they're supposed to believe. Prohibition was bad for America and it's continuation is bad.
You did not read this countless times! It says read count: 3. Hah just kidding, but I just checked out your blog and I really like it! :-)
Ha! Good catch Meg! That's the number of times that I've read it from beginning to end, but I've read pieces/parts of it here and there just about every year since I was eight. And I'm a great deal older than eight now, LOL.Glad you liked the blog!
I loved your article on the blog, and the linked interview with the author. Both were brilliant! The highly scientific comparison and sophisticated artist renderings were great.My 7 and 11-year-old boys usually run from any suggestion I make, but I am going to see if Mom can get them going on this. I am liking it very much so far, and was very impressed by your moving review.
Thank you so much Jim! I've actually been reading this out loud with my 6 1/2 year old, and while I'm not sure that she's understanding everything, she's always eager to get back to it. Is this your first time reading it? I'm always so impressed by how much it impacts me, even 20+ years later!
Yes, it is my first time reading it, and I am just getting started. But I was discussing it with my wife at dinner. She read it when she was around 8, just as you did, and has very fond memories of it. So, maybe, the kids will get around to it too between Big Nate and Wimpy Kid installments! Your daughter's reactions sound very promising.I am really looking forward to reading it for myself, and your review was definitely very motivating. (thanks so much for the invite too!) I am always interested in the foundations of faith, even though I would not count myself as a religious person. Faith can mean many things and come in many forms, and I sense that the book will tell me a lot more about that.
How lovely that your wife remembers it so well! I think that a lot of people read this in elementary school and loved it. I guess all of those people who rejected it were very wrong about its audience.I'm not a religious person either, but I do think that faith is important - and goes hand in hand with science. What else could motivate us to keep going into the unknown, searching for answers that we might never get? Madeleine L'Engle was such a brilliant woman.
Catie wrote: "I'm not a religious person either, but I do think that faith is important - and goes hand in hand with science. What else could motivate us to keep going into the unknown, searching for answers that we might never get? Madeleine L'Engle was such a brilliant woman. "Yes, you said it extremely well, and it looks as though our views on all of those points are very similar indeed. Your example of exploring the unknown is a great one. And I could really see her brilliance in that interview. I am so glad that I ran across this review and your article on the blog!
One quick example from my experience. I have looked into the eyes of a lot of scared students on the day before a big exam, and said this: "Have a little faith in yourselves! Trust in yourself and your ability, and follow your own judgment as you apply what we have taught you." Some of them have that "Are you insane?!" look when I say it, but most of them start to breathe a little easier (and nearly all of them do well on the exam).
That's a great example! I think you're going to love this book. I hope you post updates so I can see them in my feed!

Also I love the combination of science/religion. I don't understand why modern people are so afraid of it. (CS Lewis did it as well in his space trilogy).