Larissa's Reviews > Wuthering Heights

Wuthering Heights by Emily Brontë
My rating:
didn't like it it was ok liked it really liked it it was amazing
add to my books

by
20698
's review
Oct 30, 07

4 of 5 stars
bookshelves: 2007, read-together
Read in October, 2007

Certain novels come to you with pre-packaged expectations. They just seem to be part of literature's collective unconscious, even if they are completely outside of your own cultural referents. I, for instance, who have no particular knowledge of--or great love for--romantic, Anglo-Gothic fiction, came to Wuthering Heights with the assumption that I was picking up a melancholy ghost story of thwarted, passionate love and eternal obsession. Obsession turned out to be only accurate part of this presumption.

Having an image of Heathcliff and Cathy embracing Gone with the Wind-style on a windy moor ironed in my mind, I was almost completely unprepared for the hermetic, moribund, bleak, vengeful, perverse, and yes--obsessive--novel that this really is. Don Quixote is not about windmills and Wuthering Heights is not really a love story. Heathcliff and Cathy's love affair (if it can be called that) is a narcissistic ("I am Heathcliff!" Cathy exclaims at one point), possessive, and imminently cruel relationship predicated on self-denial and an obsessiveness that relies not on passion, but rather borders on hatred. They are selfish, violent, and contriving people who have borne their fair share of abuses (mostly Heathcliff in this respect) and in turn, feel no compunction about raining similar abuses on those who they find beneath them.

Given this dynamic, it seems perhaps inevitable that these two characters would make not only themselves miserable, but everyone around them miserable--even after death. This is particularly easy to accomplish mainly because there are--with the exception of Mr. Lockwood, the tenant who rents a home from Heathcliff--no outside characters. Everyone in the novel (including the servants) is isolated, trapped between the same two homes, with the same two families, and have truly no chance of escaping any of the events and repercussions that occur.(One character makes a temporary escape, only to suffer all the more for it later.)

More important, however, is the fact that Heathcliff and Cathy don't even need be present (although they usually are in some fashion) for their influences to be felt by the other characters. The sins of the father, are literally, inherited and distributed among the next generation. The children of Wuthering Heights are not only physical doubles of their parents (At least 3 characters look like Cathy, and one resembles Heathcliff), but they are also spiritual stand-ins. They must suffer for past transgressions, and they must find a way to make amends for them. All, I might add, without the particular benefit of ever having the full story, the context that might be necessary to actually change their circumstances. Misery, it seems, is inevitable.

There is, of course, much more to be said about this novel. One could spend quite some time dissecting all the various repetitions and doublings, the narrative structure (the story is told by the housekeeper to the lodger who then writes it down as a diary entry), or the archetypal analogies and semi-biblical symbolism that seems to be implicit to every part of this story.

The point being, I suppose, that while Wuthering Heights may not be the wistful romance one (or maybe just I) expected to be, it is a particularly satisfying one for all of its dark and layered surprises.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Wuthering Heights.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-10 of 10) (10 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

Meghan Wow, you by far took many words from my mouth.

I actually having precontrived notions myself about the novel, didn't expect it to be a romance at all. From what I had heard about the book it was dreary and sad. While I'm almost to very end, I am satisfied, while somewhat saddened by the outcome. The theme of the book did remain pure misery, which would make anyone a bit sad.


 ♥♥Mari♥♥ You know, I wrote my own review before I read yours, which is quite breathtaking, by the way! We seem to agree on several points, especially on this one: this book is not really a love story -- not by a long shot!

Thank you for a most wonderful review! I enjoyed it far more than the book, although I am mystified to admit that I couldn't quite put it down... I guess it has a sort of morbid fascination about it.


Larissa Hi, Maria-

Thanks so much for your kind words. I read your review and do think we agree on several points. And, I should also say, I thought it was really strange myself that Bella's favorite book is said to be Wuthering Heights. I mean, her relationship with Edward is somewhat obsessive, so maybe that aspect of it appealed? But it still seems like a strange choice...

Since you like English fiction--what is your favorite English romance? It's an area of literature that I'm only really now starting to get into. For instance, I always loved the BBC mini-series of Pride and Prejudice, but for years refused to read the book because I had dabbled in a little Austen and not enjoyed the writing. But then I read the book and loved it. So any suggestions would certainly be appreciated...


message 4: by ♥♥Mari♥♥ (last edited Feb 05, 2010 10:11am) (new) - rated it 2 stars

 ♥♥Mari♥♥ Hi, and you're very welcome!

I have read The Twilight Saga twice, and, as you can see from my avatar, I absolutely LOVE it.

Some people might think that Bella's love for Edward is obsessive. My opinion of that is that these books present the ideal of love -- a love that is profound, tender, all-encompassing. It is soulmate love. This is a love that rarely -- if ever -- exists in the real world, but it is an ideal that most women desperately want to experience. Witness the Saga's overwhelming popularity, worldwide. I for one am a very romantic person, so I lapped up the first book in a heady rush of ecstasy (I admit I have a tendency toward hyperbole, lol), and then immediately ordered the second one, which I also eagerly devoured. That was in 2006. Then I agonized for an entire year, waiting for the third one to be published. By the time I got to "Breaking Dawn", well, you can imagine!

Heathcliff's obsession with Catherine Earnshaw is MILES away from Edward's. He wants to possess Cathy, to have her all to himself, no matter what the consequences. Not so Edward Cullen, who even attempts -- at a very high cost to himself -- to leave Bella, in order to give her a chance at a normal human life, with a normal, human boy. Had I written the Saga, I would have used "Jane Eyre" as Bella's favorite book. The hero, Edward Rochester, has far more in common with Edward Cullen than Heathcliff, who is a brutal man, having buried all his tender feelings in order to give free rein to his revenge.

Now you know that my favorite English romance is "Jane Eyre", hands down! I immediately identified -- as I think most female readers have -- with the heroine of the title. She's not only very intelligent and kind, but passionate as well. Yet, unlike a lot of women, she does not allow her love for Edward Rochester to sweep away her own strong moral convictions. She forces herself to make a very wrenching decision in order to stay true to those convictions, and thereby stay true to herself.

Edward Rochester, the quintessential Byronic hero, is extremely appealing as well, except that he doesn't quite share Jane's strong sense of ethics. (Isn't that true of many real-life men? Lol.) However, he learns, through Jane, how very important it is to have such convictions. In the end, he is truly a changed man.

This book satisfies on many levels. And here I am giving it a review! I have to re-read it, and then post a more thorough review on the book's page.

Well, to continue... this novel is not only a romance; it is a moral treatise, although by no means a boring one. It is also a bold statement of the rights of women to their own true selves, not to mention a rich mine of psychological insights (a quality it shares with "Wuthering Heights").

Although I do like "Pride and Prejudice", it's the tale of Jane Eyre and Edward Rochester that has remained like a multi-faceted, polished jewel in my mind. Needless to say, I treasure this book!



Larissa What a comprehensive review!!! I'll certainly pick up Jane Eyre soon--it sounds really compelling. In the meantime, happy reading (and writing!) to you as well...


message 6: by ♥♥Mari♥♥ (last edited Feb 05, 2010 06:33pm) (new) - rated it 2 stars

 ♥♥Mari♥♥ Thank you!!

Yes, please do yourself a favor, and read this beautiful, beautiful book! You'll NEVER forget it!! I'm looking forward to your review of it.

Happy reading and writing to you as well! :)


Moira Don Quixote is not about windmills and Wuthering Heights is not really a love story

Awesome! V nice review.


message 8: by Gwynne (new) - added it

Gwynne Great review!


Larissa Thank you!


message 10: by Kim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Kim Shults It makes me remember that love and hate can be the same thing, thinly disguised.


back to top