Terence's Reviews > The Poison King: The Life and Legend of Mithradates, Rome's Deadliest Enemy

The Poison King by Adrienne Mayor
Rate this book
Clear rating

's review
Apr 11, 2011

it was ok
bookshelves: biography, history-general, history-ancient
Read from March 31 to April 07, 2011 — I own a copy , read count: 1

When Adrienne Mayor remains within the limits of her sources (both literary and archaeological), The Poison King is a solid, readable biography of a now little-known figure of the Ancient world. Unfortunately, she allows herself some wild flights of fancy better suited for a historical novel and neglects any serious analysis of the reign of Mithradates VI of Pontus, the last serious foe of Roman hegemony in what would become the eastern half of the empire.

And it is a fascinating story without need for embellishments: In 88 BC, Mithradates directly controlled or dominated much of what would become provinces of the Roman Empire except for Egypt, and could even claim to have overawed the Scythians and Sarmatians – horse nomads who had cowed both Cyrus of Persia and Alexander of Macedon.

By contrast, the late Roman Republic was a failed state. Its constitution – admired throughout the civilized world – had fallen prey to the private interests of men like Marius and Sulla and a host of lesser satellites like Pompey and Lucullus, causing endemic civil war. Roman tax collectors and financiers plundered the East, and its populations were restive under Rome’s yoke. In Spain, Sertorius would soon be raising a revolt; in Africa, Marius and Sulla had recently put down Jugurtha; and in Italy, the Social War had finally been brought to a close. There appeared to be no better time for a successor to Alexander to overthrow the Roman tyrants.

Mithradates was that man, if anyone was. He was born around 134 BC to parents who could trace their lines back to Cyrus and Alexander. Around 120 BC, Mithradates’ mother poisoned his father (her husband) and assumed a regency for both him and his younger (favored) brother (helpfully named Mithradates as well). Sometime before 113, Mithradates removed his mother and her favorite and assumed full control over Pontus. In the mid-90s, he became involved in a war with Nicomedes of Bithynia, in which Rome interfered (on Nicomedes’ behalf) and which thoroughly and permanently soured relations between Pontus and Rome. By 88, the energetic Pontine king had forged a kingdom and alliances that threatened Rome’s stranglehold over the East and he felt confident enough to take on the Republic. True to form, it was Roman rapacity that provided a proximate cause to justify the First Mithradatic War. Manius Aquillius led an illegal (i.e., unsanctioned by the Senate) invasion of Pontus, which was routed, in 89. The next year, between 80,000 and 150,000 Roman and Italian citizens and colonists were ruthlessly massacred – men, women, children – and Mithradates’ armies launched an invasion of Greece. It was a near thing for Rome – Sulla’s and Lucullus’ legions escaped defeat by the narrowest of margins and a certain amount of luck. And for the next twenty-plus years, until Mithradates’ death in 63, he and Rome were locked in a near-continuous struggle for control of the East.

As I mentioned, when Mayor sticks to sources she presents a readable account of this interesting period and man. The only caveat I would apply is that readers do need a fairly good knowledge of the period to follow what’s going on. There are a lot of names and events that are introduced with the assumption that you know who and what she’s talking about. It’s not a fatal flaw but it could limit a reader’s enjoyment and understanding.

And I was disappointed that she didn’t explore the reasons behind Mithradates’ failure to establish a viable state in answer to Roman expansion. He had the intelligence, the energy and the resources to do so. Instead she indulges fanciful flights of imagining what Mithradates was thinking on the night he escaped his mother’s (possibly) murderous intentions. It’s not as if she isn’t capable of intelligent and meaningful speculation. Using the literature and examining the geography of the Caucasus, Mayor comes to a solid and reasonable itinerary for Mithradates’ flight to the Crimea after Pompey had surprised and defeated his army in eastern Anatolia.

Another good thing about the book is Mayor’s analysis of the Ancients’ knowledge of biology – especially plants – and its use in politics and war, building upon her previous research presented in Greek Fire Poison Arrow And Scorpion Bombs (Mithradates was known as “The Poison King” because of his lifelong interest in poisons, antidotes and his investigations in those areas.)

Recommended with reservations.

In an aside: The Poison King contains the usual photos, primarily coinage, ancient sites, and Medieval and Renaissance paintings but Mayor also uses screenshots from 21st century videogames:

At first the old-school curmudgeon in me felt irked but upon reflection I don’t see why this is any different from using a Renaissance scene that’s as close to the reality as the computer image. The computer image probably has fewer anachronisms as we live in an era that likes verisimilitude.
7 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Poison King.
Sign In »

Comments (showing 1-6 of 6) (6 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Terence Yes, "historical reenactments" have to be taken with a grain of salt but I'm getting more comfortable with the idea of computer-generated imagery.

After all, how is this painting

any better (or worse) than a digital file?

Terence Elizabeth wrote: "I agree. It's not any better. But I'm always going to prefer contemporary sources, even if the picture isn't as good, vivid, etc.

Edit: Contemporary meaning contemporary to the time period in ques..."

This back and forth reminded me of those old "You Were There" movies when Walter Cronkite would go back to an important event in history and cover it. The one I remember in any sort of detail is the "Death of Socrates."

Why do I think that a similar dramatization today would have a special ops team from Sparta storming the Acropolis in a bloody hail of arrows and rescuing Socrates?

Terence I've seen "Agora" on my Suggested Movies from Netflix but I've always resisted adding it to my queue because I shudder to think what they've done to Hypatia.

Was it watchable?

I recently watched Centurion, which I thought was pretty good, and I liked Masada, not so much the Jewish revolt parts as the scenes with Peter O'Toole as Flavius Silva.

(Hey, and let's not forget "Caligula" :-)

Terence Elizabeth wrote: "I haven't seen Centurion because I'm assuming it's pretty violent. Is it really gory?..."

I didn't think so but tolerances vary. The blood and violence didn't get in the way for me, at any rate.

Terence Well, my final word on "Centurion" is that it didn't seem overly gratuitous or hacky to me. But then I'm a product of late-20th century American film culture and my tolerance for such is moderately high.

I liked Quintus Dias, the story held me for the length of the film, the love interest wasn't too sappy or melodramatic, and the ending was satisfying.

So, in your case, an advised recommendation :-)

Terence "Quintus Dias" is the name of the main character in "Centurion," though I don't know why IMDB's search wouldn't have brought it up unless it's just geared to looking at titles.

back to top