Mrs N's Reviews > Leviathan

Leviathan by Scott Westerfeld

by
120975
's review
Nov 22, 09

bookshelves: 2009, fantasy, ya-fiction
Recommended to Mrs N by: Amazon
Recommended for: Teenaged Boys
Read in November, 2009

I am quite tired of historical fiction (usually YA) in which the heroine absolutely hates being female and being forced to wear skirts and corsets and she is simply dying to run around in pants and swear and be a boy and a sailor/soldier/insert physically intense and usually dangerous male role here. I strongly believe that is anachronistic in almost every case. Modern authors think, "How dreadful to be polite and wear a corset! She must want to be a boy!" That is sexist and frankly more than a little Freudian. Apparently authors are the only people still alive who believe that each woman desires a unit of her very own. For heaven's sake. I think it is lazy writing and a misplaced desire to have a female main character at any cost. Westerfeld, next time just make the main characters both male and spare me the anti-feminine crap.

However, even if both main characters had been male, I would still only give this book two stars. There are pages and pages of detailed descriptions of war machines and animal hybrids. Bo-ring. Twelve-to-fourteen-year-old boys should love this book.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Leviathan.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-4 of 4) (4 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

message 1: by Vi (new) - added it

Vi Vi That Freudian line made me laugh because I just learned about 'penis-envy' lol. So ridic.

I'm still gonna read this book just to judge for myself, but nice to hear some different opinions!


message 2: by Elaine Shandra (new) - added it

Elaine Shandra There actually was a female who posed as a male in the British Army because she wanted to serve and wasn't allowed to.


Amelia, the pragmatic idealist hey! haven't read this one yet, and the whole Deryn-wants-to-be-a-boy thing keeps it from topping my TBR.
I just really appreciated what you had to say, because I definitely think you are right! And awesome with the 'Freudian' :D
Being a girl doesn't make one boring! Good gracious!


Giraffasaurus I don't know, personally I'd be annoyed to live in a time that said what I couldn't do simply based on my gender. It would have irritated me to have limited choices and see my male counterparts have so many choices in life. Do you really think every woman in the past was happy with the limitations put on them?


back to top