<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	<review id="76903181">
    <user id="1090874">
    <name><![CDATA[Mike]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Dekalb, IL]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1090874-mike]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="2009" />
        <shelf name="owned" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Fri Nov 06 00:00:00 -0800 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Fri Nov 06 06:39:01 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Nov 10 13:24:52 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[A mixed bag really, and kind of a disappointment after reading <em>Carrying the Body</em>, but there's still some great stuff in here.  Some of it is too divorced from any idea of narrative that, when combined with Raffel's generally brilliant &amp; minimal style, it just becomes a mess of words.  But at other times this mess of words is beautiful.  There were a couple stories that slayed, but surprisingly, based on the two books, I prefer Raffel in long(er) form, more time to develop the intensity, to engage the reader.]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/76903181]]></url>
</review>

</GoodreadsResponse>