<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	<review id="75118986">
    <user id="1346611">
    <name><![CDATA[Jane]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1346611-jane-greensmith]]></url>
    
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">6138</id>
  <isbn>0375757856</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780375757853</isbn13>
  <ratings_count type="integer">2985</ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">403</text_reviews_count>
  <title>The Moonstone (Modern Library Classics)</title>
  <average_rating></average_rating>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6138.The_Moonstone</link>
<author>
  <id type="integer">4012</id>
  <name>Wilkie Collins</name>
  <ratings_count type="integer">10392</ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1744</text_reviews_count>
</author>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Oct 20 08:12:46 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Nov 16 11:45:32 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I'm glad I finally got around to reading The Moonstone and can put a tick mark next to it on the list of classics read--but I was a bit disappointed, considering all the hype around it.  It's a good book, by all means, but not a great one. <br/><br/>More than anything else, The Moonstone is a mystery story. Told from the point-of-view of several characters, some quite minor to the plot actually, the narrative is a series of recollections that sometimes sound as if they were legal statements for a trial. While I can appreciate the air of authenticity this gives to the fiction, it does tend to get a bit tedious, especially if the characters are long-winded. I did think that Collins did a superb job in staying in character, with each of the narrators having their own distinct voice.<br/><br/>Also, considering that the novel first was published serially, Collins did an incredible job in keeping his details straight as he unfolded the mystery. It's hard enough to keep a story bounded from beginning to end anyway, but to do so without being able to revise the beginning to suit how the end evolves is simply staggering.<br/><br/>There are a fair number of interesting characters--Cuff and Bruff, the detective and the lawyer, the trio of cousins (Rachel, Godfrey, and Franklin), the Robinson Crusoe-reading steward Betteridge and his lady's maid daughter, and my favorite, Ezra Jennings, an opium addict who solves the mystery, at least 90% of it. I see a lot of Dickensian characterization particularly in the latter part of the book--for example, Octavius Guy (aka 'Gooseberry'), the little boy who works for Mr. Bruff, is afflicted with eyes that &quot;projected so far, and they rolled about so loosely, that you wondered uneasily why they remained in their sockets.&quot;<br/><br/>I found the book remarkably thin when it came to passages that stirred my soul, challenged my intellect, or left me breathless with admiration. In other words, Wilkie Collins told a good, interesting story but I didn't come away from reading it thinking that it had changed me in any way. <br/><br/>A good book, but not a great one. Now I need to get the movie on order! ]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/75118986]]></url>
</review>

</GoodreadsResponse>