false 0 2009-09-25T18:34:06-07:00 1361841 1 2009-09-25T18:34:06-07:00 2 0 false false Sat Sep 26 00:00:00 -0700 2009 Fri Sep 25 18:34:00 -0700 2009 Sat Sep 26 06:48:43 -0700 2009
Arguing against technology using the laws and notions of the past makes no sense because laws and notions of the past are irrelevant when it comes to protecting works of art. The Creative Commons movement is at least an inclusive group that seeks to make sense of how technology and art can fit together. This book contributes little because Helprin can't get past the notion that technology can contribute to art (he sees only one side of the argument through his perspective from the past). ]]>