<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	<review id="70443046">
    <user id="1272577">
    <name><![CDATA[repan]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Romania]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1272577-repan]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Sep 08 00:46:57 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Sep 08 01:02:22 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I grade this book higher than other readers. For me it was fascinating, it was something like the Neuromancer, but not fantasy.<br/><br/>I tottally recommend it, but read it soon, in 10-15 years it will lose interest as the world is changing so fast.<br/><br/>Probably in 2001 when it was published the present appearing in the book was shining avantgarde, a little piece from the near past struggling to become present, probably some readers from that time treated it as near science fiction. But I'd like to think at it as written in the 40's as fantasy depicting some strange future that will never happen, not the creepy exciting present we are living in.<br/><br/>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/70443046]]></url>
</review>

</GoodreadsResponse>