<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	<review id="66938675">
    <user id="198932">
    <name><![CDATA[Brian]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United Kingdom]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/198932-brian]]></url>
    
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">2994708</id>
  <isbn>0330435523</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780330435529</isbn13>
  <ratings_count type="integer">2</ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>Angel Isle</title>
  <average_rating></average_rating>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2994708.Angel_Isle</link>
<author>
  <id type="integer">5345</id>
  <name>Peter Dickinson</name>
  <ratings_count type="integer">1772</ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">239</text_reviews_count>
</author>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="childrens" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Aug 10 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Aug 11 06:45:17 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Aug 11 06:55:40 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Philip Pullman described Peter Dickinson as 'the mmost surprising, the most original of children's writers at work today.' I'd go along with that. <br/><br/>Angel Isle is the sequel to The Ropemaker, which I read some time ago. Immediately afterwards, I started Angel Isle but couldn't get into it because it lacks some of the immediacy of The Ropemaker. This time I got to the end but I still had my reservations. <br/><br/>Dickinson is a strikingly original writer and the quality of his fantasy is never in doubt but structurally this book is a bit ramshackle and some of the writing struck me as careless. There was too much tell rather than show; there were pages of unmediated dialogue in which it was possible to lose track of who was speaking so that I had to go back and count out the paragraphs; and some of the characterisation was a bit heavy-handed.<br/><br/>Nevertheless, despite these rather trenchant criticisms, it's an exciting and entertaining read and there was always enough of Dickinson's unique vision to keep me reading to the very end. <br/><br/>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/66938675]]></url>
</review>

</GoodreadsResponse>