<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	<review id="66909286">
    <user id="259202">
    <name><![CDATA[Audacia]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[New York, NY]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/259202-audacia-ray]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="india" />
        <shelf name="read-in-2009" />
        <shelf name="sex-and-gender" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Wed Aug 26 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Aug 10 20:07:22 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Aug 26 06:48:49 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Oh academic kool aid, how I refuse to drink you.<br/><br/>The snippets of women's stories are the absolute best part of this book, and the way Thapan teases out class among the women she studies is really interesting. Or, it *would* be really interesting if her writing was more accessible.<br/><br/>I know it's the academic format and all, but a lot of the time I think that books like this would be better if they just presented nice long passages of interviews with the people studied, without commentary. I know I'm an oral history/story junky, but I just think that would be better than the writer as ultimate authority/presenter of information.<br/><br/>There were just too many points in this book in which I felt like Thapan was getting in her own way or using intensely academic language to describe things that are common sense.<br/><br/>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/66909286]]></url>
</review>

</GoodreadsResponse>