Ben Babcock's Reviews > Lilith's Brood: Dawn / Adulthood Rites / Imago
Lilith's Brood: Dawn / Adulthood Rites / Imago (Xenogenesis, #1-3)
by Octavia E. Butler
by Octavia E. Butler
Ben Babcock's review
bookshelves: english-3950, own, 2009-read, favourites, gender-issues, post-apocalyptic, posthuman, science-fiction, 2009-best10
Nov 26, 09
bookshelves: english-3950, own, 2009-read, favourites, gender-issues, post-apocalyptic, posthuman, science-fiction, 2009-best10
Read in November, 2009
This is one of the scariest books I have read in a long time. Good science fiction, good posthuman fiction, challenges the idea of what it means to be human. Octavia E. Butler goes beyond that, way beyond, challenging not just what human means but how open-minded I am to such challenges. This book blew my mind.
As a huge fan of science fiction, and as a relatively erudite person, I like to think that I have an open mind. I like to think that I'm receptive to the idea of drastically alternate human futures. I believe the Singularity, if we survive long enough, is inevitable—and I welcome it. After reading Lilith's Brood, especially the first book, Dawn, I'm no longer so sure of my open-mindedness. As I read the book, I found Butler's ideas running up against walls of prejudice and bias I didn't even know I have.
The Oankali rescue humanity from the brink of total annihilation by global warfare. They offer humanity the chance to survive, but at the price of human independence: humans and Oankali would hybridize, their mating supervised and controlled by the third-gendered Oankali ooloi, who can manipulate DNA of individual cells. Some humans don't like this idea, so they resist. This surprises the Oankali, who are continually frustrated by "the human contradiction" of "intelligence and hierarchical society." It takes a human, at first, Lilith, to help the Oankali succeed in their plan to save humanity. Later, two of Lilith's human-Oankali construct children, Akin and Jodahs, make valuable contributions toward ensuring the future of both humans and the human-Oankali species being born on Earth. Of course, the question remains: is it enough? Can we ever triumph over "the human contradiction" and survive, whether independently or in a merger with the Oankali?
Butler doesn't seek answers to these questions. She addresses their existence, which may or may not have been obvious to the reader, and then explores the idea of merging with an alien species. This isn't a trashy SF novel with tentacle sex and mind-blowing orgasms. It's a deeply seductive, profound, and repulsive SF novel with tentacle sex and mind-blowing orgasms. The Oankali are terrifying because they are truly alien, and it's impossible for humans to negotiate with them on human terms. Probably the most potent example occurs at the end of Dawn, when Lilith tells her ooloi mate, Nikanj, that she is not ready to have children with it. Yet ooloi are perceptive to the cellular level, and Nikanj knows that even if Lilith claims that she does not want children, her body wants children. So he makes her pregnant. This abrogation of Lilith's free will and control over her body recurs throughout the series, and is explicitly codified in Imago by Jodahs. It is undergoing its first metamorphosis, changing from child to subadult ooloi—an unexpected change, and one that may mean exile to the orbiting ship. Nikanj again makes a promise, this time to Jodahs, to let Jodahs stay with it "for as long as you want to stay." Jodahs interprets:
Through the ooloi model of decision-making and action, Butler challenges our individuality by removing our prerogative for self-deception. Suddenly, our wants and needs are determined biologically, regardless of what we say we want. Is there a difference? Should there be a difference? I don't know, but the idea of some third party disregarding my wishes, whether those wishes are right or wrong, certainly scares me.
This emphasis of the biological over the social is a major theme of Lilith's Brood and also the source of my only real disappointment with the series. I dislike how strongly Butler emphasizes the biological construction of gender and ignores pretty much anything except the "traditional" heterosexual masculine male and feminine female. Yes, the mating of humans and Oankali challenges our ideas of sex, but not really gender—aside from the act being performed, men are still masculine and females are still feminine. There are no gay men or lesbian women—I don't think the Oankali would have an equivalent relation, because they would not understand the idea of "sexual orientation." To them, sex is purely physical. Love, as humans define it, does not exist. Mating is based on attraction, maintained by permanent neurochemical attraction, and for the purpose of procreation. The gender roles of the Oankali are even more strictly partitioned than human genders have ever been, to the point of being indistinguishable from biological sex. I'm not certain how much of this omission is deliberate on Butler's part or to what purpose, but I think it's an avenue of exploration that shouldn't have been left fallow.
Aside from this disappointment, this book's brilliance compensates for its other faults. Adulthood Rites and Imago are somewhat less compelling than Dawn, partly because of the changes in perspective—although it's interesting how Butler begins the series with a human protagonist, then switches to a male human-Oankali construct, and concludes with an ooloi human-Oankali. These increasing degrees of Otherness are an effective narrative strategy, but sometimes the later two books failed to hold my interest. Sometimes the Resister characters felt too thin—not that I disbelieved that humans could act so harshly and shortsightedly, but that everyone seemed to act that way. Butler explores the psyche of the very alien Oankali and human-Oankali constructs, but she seldom delves into the minds of regular humans, save for Lilith in Dawn.
Lilith's Brood made me look at my own psyche, however, and question how well I knew myself—that is, to what extent I was deceiving myself when it came to my tolerance for change. I still like to think I'm eager for the posthuman future, but Butler has helped show me that it could be far more frightening, on both a visceral and conceptual level, and far more seductive, than I previously thought. This series is a masterwork combination of thought experiment and character conflict, and it has accomplished what all books set out to do but few books can achieve: it has changed me. A thought-compelling exploration of possibilities, Butler creates verisimilitude even as she pulls us away from any sense of normal, removes any sense of safety, and refuses to reassure us that the questions we ask ourselves will have nice, comforting answers.
Read this book.
As a huge fan of science fiction, and as a relatively erudite person, I like to think that I have an open mind. I like to think that I'm receptive to the idea of drastically alternate human futures. I believe the Singularity, if we survive long enough, is inevitable—and I welcome it. After reading Lilith's Brood, especially the first book, Dawn, I'm no longer so sure of my open-mindedness. As I read the book, I found Butler's ideas running up against walls of prejudice and bias I didn't even know I have.
The Oankali rescue humanity from the brink of total annihilation by global warfare. They offer humanity the chance to survive, but at the price of human independence: humans and Oankali would hybridize, their mating supervised and controlled by the third-gendered Oankali ooloi, who can manipulate DNA of individual cells. Some humans don't like this idea, so they resist. This surprises the Oankali, who are continually frustrated by "the human contradiction" of "intelligence and hierarchical society." It takes a human, at first, Lilith, to help the Oankali succeed in their plan to save humanity. Later, two of Lilith's human-Oankali construct children, Akin and Jodahs, make valuable contributions toward ensuring the future of both humans and the human-Oankali species being born on Earth. Of course, the question remains: is it enough? Can we ever triumph over "the human contradiction" and survive, whether independently or in a merger with the Oankali?
Butler doesn't seek answers to these questions. She addresses their existence, which may or may not have been obvious to the reader, and then explores the idea of merging with an alien species. This isn't a trashy SF novel with tentacle sex and mind-blowing orgasms. It's a deeply seductive, profound, and repulsive SF novel with tentacle sex and mind-blowing orgasms. The Oankali are terrifying because they are truly alien, and it's impossible for humans to negotiate with them on human terms. Probably the most potent example occurs at the end of Dawn, when Lilith tells her ooloi mate, Nikanj, that she is not ready to have children with it. Yet ooloi are perceptive to the cellular level, and Nikanj knows that even if Lilith claims that she does not want children, her body wants children. So he makes her pregnant. This abrogation of Lilith's free will and control over her body recurs throughout the series, and is explicitly codified in Imago by Jodahs. It is undergoing its first metamorphosis, changing from child to subadult ooloi—an unexpected change, and one that may mean exile to the orbiting ship. Nikanj again makes a promise, this time to Jodahs, to let Jodahs stay with it "for as long as you want to stay." Jodahs interprets:
It meant as long as I was not more miserable alone with the family than it believed I would be if I were cut off from the family and sent to the ship. Humans tended to misunderstand ooloi when ooloi said things like that. Humans thought the ooloi were promising that they would do nothing until the Humans said they had changed their minds—told the ooloi with their mouths, in words. But the ooloi perceived all that a living being said—all words, all gestures, and a vast array of other internal and external bodily responses. Ooloi absorbed everything and acted according to whatever consensus they discovered. Thus ooloi treated individuals as they treated groups of beings. They sought a consensus. If there was none, it meant the being was confused, ignorant, frightened, or in some way not yet able to see its own best interests. The ooloi gave information and perhaps calmness until they could perceive a consensus. Then they acted.
Through the ooloi model of decision-making and action, Butler challenges our individuality by removing our prerogative for self-deception. Suddenly, our wants and needs are determined biologically, regardless of what we say we want. Is there a difference? Should there be a difference? I don't know, but the idea of some third party disregarding my wishes, whether those wishes are right or wrong, certainly scares me.
This emphasis of the biological over the social is a major theme of Lilith's Brood and also the source of my only real disappointment with the series. I dislike how strongly Butler emphasizes the biological construction of gender and ignores pretty much anything except the "traditional" heterosexual masculine male and feminine female. Yes, the mating of humans and Oankali challenges our ideas of sex, but not really gender—aside from the act being performed, men are still masculine and females are still feminine. There are no gay men or lesbian women—I don't think the Oankali would have an equivalent relation, because they would not understand the idea of "sexual orientation." To them, sex is purely physical. Love, as humans define it, does not exist. Mating is based on attraction, maintained by permanent neurochemical attraction, and for the purpose of procreation. The gender roles of the Oankali are even more strictly partitioned than human genders have ever been, to the point of being indistinguishable from biological sex. I'm not certain how much of this omission is deliberate on Butler's part or to what purpose, but I think it's an avenue of exploration that shouldn't have been left fallow.
Aside from this disappointment, this book's brilliance compensates for its other faults. Adulthood Rites and Imago are somewhat less compelling than Dawn, partly because of the changes in perspective—although it's interesting how Butler begins the series with a human protagonist, then switches to a male human-Oankali construct, and concludes with an ooloi human-Oankali. These increasing degrees of Otherness are an effective narrative strategy, but sometimes the later two books failed to hold my interest. Sometimes the Resister characters felt too thin—not that I disbelieved that humans could act so harshly and shortsightedly, but that everyone seemed to act that way. Butler explores the psyche of the very alien Oankali and human-Oankali constructs, but she seldom delves into the minds of regular humans, save for Lilith in Dawn.
Lilith's Brood made me look at my own psyche, however, and question how well I knew myself—that is, to what extent I was deceiving myself when it came to my tolerance for change. I still like to think I'm eager for the posthuman future, but Butler has helped show me that it could be far more frightening, on both a visceral and conceptual level, and far more seductive, than I previously thought. This series is a masterwork combination of thought experiment and character conflict, and it has accomplished what all books set out to do but few books can achieve: it has changed me. A thought-compelling exploration of possibilities, Butler creates verisimilitude even as she pulls us away from any sense of normal, removes any sense of safety, and refuses to reassure us that the questions we ask ourselves will have nice, comforting answers.
Read this book.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Lilith's Brood.
sign in »
Comments (showing 1-7 of 7) (7 new)
date
newest »
newest »
A really good review! I love how Octavia Butler forces her characters far outside the boundaries of what they find acceptable and good. In most of her novels, horrible things happen that would be unthinkable in other people's work, but somehow the characters forge from that horrible some new way to be alive, to survive, some new good. I wonder if that comes from her African-American heritage, with its history of surviving slavery, as wrong and horrific as that is, and coming through it with so much grace, strength, and just pure life-power? I always see that parallel in her work. Did you ever read Kindred? I'm broken-hearted that she died. I wanted to read many more of her novels.
BunWat wrote: "I don't know it felt to me like some of that was sort of poking holes in the whole notion that a simple notion of gender fits anyone at all - except in the biological sense."With the Oankali, there is no distinction between gender and sex. Having three sexes makes the more alien, yes, but it doesn't address my concern, which is that Butler never really mentions how the Oankali perception of gender-as-sex affects the more complicated notions human beings have.
Part of what makes Lilith's Brood so terrifying is its insistent biological determinism. The Oankali see all behaviour in terms of biology: you are what your chemicals make you. Hence their lack of an equivalence for love; mating is a biological act and attraction is completely neurochemical. We're socialized into believing that we are "special," that our sentience somehow elevates us from the shackles of our genes (whether or not this is true). Lilith's Brood is a refutation of this idea. Yet Butler's treatment of gender leaves me dissatisfied. The only implication I can see is that any deviation from a dichotomous gender/sex scheme is biologically unacceptable and thus not permissible. But because Butler doesn't actually explore this area, I can't say for sure—and this my objection, the absence of the subject rather than how the subject is presented.
BunWat wrote: "So I guess I'm not understanding what it is you are seeing as an emphasis on traditional heterosexuality. Are you saying you wished there were some characters who were gay before the Oankali came into the picture?"I'm not talking about how humans see the Oankali. It's true that Butler challenges our conventional ideas of biological sex through the Oankalis' three sexes and mating habits. I'm accusing her of being less nuanced when she approaches human gender. Yes, Butler's characters do react with repulsion to the Oankali habits at first—but each character's objections are predicated upon his or her gender role, and those roles are always one of the traditional two.
Having a gay character would be one way of solving this, yes. I don't want to equate my objection to an objection over the absence of homosexuality. This is just a convenient example because it's a fairly common way in which one's gender deviates from the traditional role expected of one's sex. It's probably not even a good example, since it starts confusing gender role with sexual orientation; I'm sure there are plenty of gay men who seem themselves as consummately masculine.
The problem is that the Oankali model equates sex with gender, which eliminates the continuum of gender that exists in human society. According to the Oankali, one is male, female, or ooloi. Those are both sexes and gender roles, and one is supposed to behave within parameters defined by those roles. Butler does a fantastic job of showing how humans react to the otherness of the Oankali and their genders, but lost amid this is any sense of how the diversity of our gender roles is affected by this simplification to a biological basis for gender.
I totally see what Ben means, though it had never occurred to me in my various rereadings of these books through the years. Butler does sort of play off against society's very rigid gender roles. I think maybe what we're seeing is the generational change between society when Octavia Butler and I were growing up, and society today. The spectrum of gender really didn't exist as a social concept in those days, or not as a public thing. It was much less a part of mainstream thought about human culture and human sexuality, I mean. Society at that time considered sex to be quite a private subject, and so any understanding of the wide continuum of gender roles was much less a part of mainstream thought.Obviously people's behavior hasn't changed much in millennia, but the way society thinks about people's behavior has changed and is still changing. That's interesting to me because Butler herself was a strong masculine looking female. When I first saw her in person, at NorEasCon 2 in Boston around 1979 or so, I took her for a transgendered person. She seemed physically quite male. But I later found from reading her work and reading about her that she's always been female, but just built like that, very muscular and compact, and looking the way society at the time felt was masculine.
Because I've always been a feminist, and enjoyed a field of work that's seen by society as typically male, I really identified all along with her strong female characters. I felt like her work had a lot to say that was interesting and pertinent on gender and society.
How awesome, now, to realize that even while she was exploring these very ideas of strict gender roles that she was still an example of her culture at the time in some ways in these same ideas. We all are still denizens of the times and places we live, and it shows, regardless of how much we are open-minded, educated, and willing to consider very different schemes for living. It also makes me happy to realize how far our society has come in the last 35 years or so towards accepting people as they are instead of seeing them as failed exemplars of some strict ideal of masculine or feminine.
I think this illuminates, too, a discussion some of us were having about Robert Heinlein a while back, and what a creepy old sexist goat he seems now, while to himself at the time in the early 60s I'm sure he was expressing his desires for society to achieve the complete liberation of women. He most likely felt he was being extremely progressive, while we in our time look back and see him as horribly chauvinistic. =)
BunWat wrote: "Its subtext, but at least for me, its there. Maybe this has something to do with the book being twenty years old? A greater degree of indirection?"Well that's part of the problem. I have a hard time telling if the omission I perceive is intentional on Butler's part or just an oversight. I don't mean to say that Lilith's Brood has a paucity of diverse characters; as you point out, Lilith is definitely a strong female character. But even as the humans fight to preserve their species, their biology, no one seems too concerned about what the human-Oankali merger is doing to gender.
Then again, perhaps I'm looking at this in the wrong light, since the resulting "Oankali" species will be neither human nor Oankali, but a combination of the two. Perhaps the simplification of gender is another reason why it is so essential to preserve that "pure" strain of humanity on Mars, to keep that aspect of social as well as biological diversity.
BunWat wrote: "So what do you think about the oft repeated description of humans having this central flaw of being "heirarchical?""
Remember that the Oankali diagnose humanity's self-destructive nature as a result of having both hierarchy and intelligence. According to them, a species can be successful with one of these traits but not both. The combination is lethal, because in an intelligent species with a hierarchical power structure, those who are tempted to abuse power can manipulate the system to place themselves in positions of power—sometimes it isn't that power corrupts but that power attracts the corrupt. The Oankali solution is to have an egalitarian society ruled by what seems to be some form of consensus democracy. There is no overall authority, and so there is no power available for people to abuse. The alternative solution is to remove individual intelligence, so we get something like a colony of ants: hierarchy, but the individual workers lack the ability to even conceive of abusing the system.
Tatiana wrote: "We all are still denizens of the times and places we live, and it shows, regardless of how much we are open-minded, educated, and willing to consider very different schemes for living."
So true. I'm only 20 years old right now, but I look forward to being a sixty-year-old (assuming I live that long) curmudgeon reactionary who insists that society is going downhill and it was better "in the old days." :D


Well put. That is indeed the crux of the matter.