Evan Mcclellan's Reviews > The Stand
The Stand
by Stephen King
by Stephen King
Are 1100 pages enough to stop a bullet? This was the question that came to mind when my roommate asked if I had anything to use as target practice for when we would go shooting. Well, that was not the exact question. More of a theoretical situation, really. Suppose you are being shot at, and you have a paperback copy of the stand in your pocket, and that's where the bullet hit, would Stephen King's really thick novel be enough to stop the bullet and save your life? I was determined to find out.
Some reading this may be more horrified by the fact that I would be willing to even think of shooting such a beloved book. And I agree, based on seeing it's affect, that shooting a book is a very violent act. Yet I didn't feel any remorse in shooting it. I do admire Stephen King as a writer, though. I read several books of his (before and after reading the Stand) that I did enjoy a great deal, and hope he keeps writing more books. I like King's style, and something tells me that he would be amused to know that I shot his book. But I didn't like the Stand because I felt that it failed to deliver on it's promise of an "apocayptic confrontation between Good and Evil." I was waiting for our heroes to make the stand, which is a very powerful phrase and title for a book. *** vague spoilers follow *** Well, the heroes stood, and that's pretty much all they did, just in time for the most shameless deus ex machina ending I've ever come across. All the bad guys died in a way that wouldn't have made any difference if the good guys had been there to make their stand or not. I read about three hundred pages of tedious ad hoc committee meetings to get to that? Disapointing. I expected so much more. *** end of vague spoilers ***
But perhaps the book had other virtues. Maybe, just maybe, this 1,168 page book could save someone's life if they were being shot at. Just to make one thing clear: I, in no way, advocate the use of fire arms to maliciously deface intelectual property. I wouldn't have tried this on the Scarlet Letter which is 272 pages and which I equally disliked. I was going to shoot the Stand in the name of Science and public safety.
My roommate and I took it to an outdoor shooting range to test such a possibility. I mounted it up on a dirt berm, and used my roommate's .45 rifle to shoot it. No wimpy guns here, could this book stop a bullet or couldn't it?
Four bullets hit the Stand. Two bullets grazed the side. One went through the "h" in "Stephen" and curved up through the top before reaching page 450. The last bullet hit just below center, making a perfectly shaped O. What took me two months to get through, that bullet blew through in a tiny fraction of second. The bullet exploded out the back, ripping a two inch hole through the back cover, and finally ending in a puff of dirt behind it.
So the answer is no, my friends. 1,168 pages are not enough to save your life from a .45 slug. I wish I could say otherwise. If they had I would have given this book a higher rating.
Some reading this may be more horrified by the fact that I would be willing to even think of shooting such a beloved book. And I agree, based on seeing it's affect, that shooting a book is a very violent act. Yet I didn't feel any remorse in shooting it. I do admire Stephen King as a writer, though. I read several books of his (before and after reading the Stand) that I did enjoy a great deal, and hope he keeps writing more books. I like King's style, and something tells me that he would be amused to know that I shot his book. But I didn't like the Stand because I felt that it failed to deliver on it's promise of an "apocayptic confrontation between Good and Evil." I was waiting for our heroes to make the stand, which is a very powerful phrase and title for a book. *** vague spoilers follow *** Well, the heroes stood, and that's pretty much all they did, just in time for the most shameless deus ex machina ending I've ever come across. All the bad guys died in a way that wouldn't have made any difference if the good guys had been there to make their stand or not. I read about three hundred pages of tedious ad hoc committee meetings to get to that? Disapointing. I expected so much more. *** end of vague spoilers ***
But perhaps the book had other virtues. Maybe, just maybe, this 1,168 page book could save someone's life if they were being shot at. Just to make one thing clear: I, in no way, advocate the use of fire arms to maliciously deface intelectual property. I wouldn't have tried this on the Scarlet Letter which is 272 pages and which I equally disliked. I was going to shoot the Stand in the name of Science and public safety.
My roommate and I took it to an outdoor shooting range to test such a possibility. I mounted it up on a dirt berm, and used my roommate's .45 rifle to shoot it. No wimpy guns here, could this book stop a bullet or couldn't it?
Four bullets hit the Stand. Two bullets grazed the side. One went through the "h" in "Stephen" and curved up through the top before reaching page 450. The last bullet hit just below center, making a perfectly shaped O. What took me two months to get through, that bullet blew through in a tiny fraction of second. The bullet exploded out the back, ripping a two inch hole through the back cover, and finally ending in a puff of dirt behind it.
So the answer is no, my friends. 1,168 pages are not enough to save your life from a .45 slug. I wish I could say otherwise. If they had I would have given this book a higher rating.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Stand.
sign in »
Comments (showing 1-19 of 19) (19 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Leslie
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Oct 01, 2009 12:47pm
Was it a paperback? Or Hardcover?
reply
|
flag
*
Seems more like a review of your trip to the shooting range, but I agree with it completely. It's a frustrating book. It meanders off the map frequently but then you get these short visceral scenes of the superflu or society collapsing that's interesting. I knew the ending would be anti-climactic and tapped out at 700 pages.
i disagree with your review, but i must say it was one of the most engaging reviews i have ever read! good work.
I also disagreed with your review. However, my son & I laughed and laughed at your "Can It Stop a Bullet" story! Very Interesting!
Hilarious! I've often wondered if a book like the Stand could stop a bullet, but I was thinking more like a .22. I enjoyed the first 100 pages of the Stand, but couldn't make it through to the anti-climatic end (although I knew the ending from watching the old TV movie). I completely agree that using a powerful title like "The Stand" and then not having a stand was a real cop-out.
Funniest review I've ever read! (And ironically made me want to give the book a go, just to see if I could get through it!) I must add that it would be awesome to do the bullet review part 2, and see what happens with the hardback!!! ;)
I can't agree with your review enough. I mean, I forced myself to gut through the whole thing while hoping that King would at some point make a great story of it. I kept thinking, "soon enough he'll bring it all together in a way that more than redeems the last eight hundred pages of emergency toilet paper, and then I can be proud I stuck with it." But no, all I did was waste valuable reading time on it, and since my books get destroyed from carrying and such, I can't even sell it to one of these jerks who assumes that just because it's got a familiar name on the cover, it's a masterpiece. I'd give it away, but stupidly I already vented to the people I know about how disappointing it is. So, since I can't think of anything else to do with 1168 pages of stalling, I might just go ahead and test the effects of 7.62 and 5.56 on it. Thank you for a good review and idea.
Cute. I thought it was funny when you posted this review over on Amazon and it still works. Bet the book would stop a 25ACP and possibly a 32 ACP. Not sure about a .380 ACP though.
I totally agree with your review, regarding the content of the book, at least. Totally let down by the shameless ending, after 300 pages of meeting minutes. Seemed a cheap way to add length, followed by a rushed, tacked on ending, with no actual "stand" or confrontation to speak of. I expected so much more.
I disagree with you on this, but enjoyed your review all the same. The Good guys sacrificed themselves, similar to and mirroring another sacrifice. It was their willingness to do so which caused God to set in motion that Deuce ex Machina ending.
lol, the thing about the book not being able to stop a bullet is good to no, because I think I actually wondered that myself once. I haven't read the book so I'm not saying your review is great because I agree with you; it was just fun to read.






