<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	<review id="6393466">
    <user id="320644">
    <name><![CDATA[Jeremiah]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Boston, MA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/320644-jeremiah]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="spyfi" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sat Sep 01 00:00:00 -0700 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Sep 18 12:42:50 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri Oct 05 08:30:12 -0700 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I had a lot of trouble with this book. More in the tradition of Clancy (with all the gun talk) then the spyfi I tend to favor. The quotes on the top of each chapter are fun but since I've read so much on the corporate outsourcing of national defense its not groundbreaking. It never got beyond nover formulaistic action, with the damsels and the rape and the sex and the big explosions. I was hoping for something a lot more hard hitting about the privtazaition of national security.<br/><br/>Graham Greene or LeCarre this is not. Though if you like Clancy this will probably resonate.]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/6393466]]></url>
</review>

</GoodreadsResponse>