<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	<review id="63204474">
    <user id="659350">
    <name><![CDATA[Mike]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/659350-mike]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>1</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Jun 01 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Jul 12 17:46:43 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Jul 12 17:49:49 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[After trudging all the way through this book and then getting lost even reading the plot synopsis I have decided that the controversy surrounding its publication are more interesting than the book itself.]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/63204474]]></url>
</review>

</GoodreadsResponse>