Inder's Reviews > I, Robot

I, Robot by Isaac Asimov
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
250817
's review
Aug 19, 09

bookshelves: 20th-century, fiction, science, 1001-books, read-2009, other-reading-2009
Read in August, 2009

I spent the first half of this book noting the similarities between I, Robot and Foundation. Short vignettes that build on each other - check. Clever but gruff lead male characters - check. A central philosophical conundrum presented in puzzle form - check. Pointed references to religious belief as a lower form of intelligence - check.

These are the only two Asimov novels I have read, but based on what I know so far, I would venture to guess that Asimov used this "formula" in other novels as well. Not that there is anything wrong with that.

Once I recovered from my initial "This is Foundation, but with robots!" reaction, I really started to enjoy I, Robot, for the same reasons I enjoyed Foundation: It is really smart and also really fun. A geeky good time. Asimov is no Vonnegut, but neither is anyone else (besides Vonnegut).
likeflag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read I, Robot.
sign in »

Reading Progress

08/11/2009 page 95
34.93% "I'm recovering from the fact that this is a robot version of Foundation and beginning to enjoy myself anyway."
08/12/2009 page 150
55.15% "Definitely turning the pages quickly now."

Comments (showing 1-7 of 7) (7 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

Rebecca Can't wait to read "I, Robot, but without robots!" Aka Foundation.


message 2: by Howard (new)

Howard Uliss The two series are tied together. I read the 3 robot books and all the foundation books-great stuff. The last three foundation books were written by authors other than Asimov. He died and they were written by 3 famous disciples and are good in their own right.


message 3: by Elizabeth (new)

Elizabeth M and I joke about the 3 laws all the time. When I taught it, of course, I had to point out the sexism/racism of it. The leaders of the different regions of the world cracked me up--Europe was repp'd by an old woman. I think Africa was repp'd by a lazy dude or something, don't quite recall. And of course the woman scientist had to be almost robotic herself--a chick can't be good at science AND have feelings/femininity. The robot/woman link is always fascinating in the old timey/canonical SF. The word "robot" came from czeck for laborer, and a playright wrote a socialist play about machine workers--class/labor issues built into the premise from the start. So interesting! (Sorry if i got too academic/pedantic there.)


Rebecca Ah yes, the random world politics symbolism at the end is so hilariously, eye-rollingly unsubtle. As was the whole episode wherein frigid scientist lady is outsmarted by the robot because actually she just wants to be loved. Barf. But as I said in my review, at least she wasn't an evil sexbot.


Inder I completely agree but I figured everyone was bored by my rants about sexism in mid-20th-century sci-fi (see my review of Foundation for a starting point).


message 6: by Inder (last edited Aug 30, 2009 10:13PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Inder Actually, the African was a real go-getter - the opposite of lazy. The tropics region was set to take over the world. But still, pretty unsubtle.


message 7: by Elizabeth (new)

Elizabeth I think I was madder about it at the time because I was TAing for a real piece of work who didn't make a single comment in lecture on the at-least-she's-not-a-sexbot. I think if I read it now I'd roll with it a bit more. And then read more Octavia Butler.


back to top