<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	<review id="56773017">
    <user id="707268">
    <name><![CDATA[Kira]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Los Angeles, CA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/707268-kira]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="comics" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Wed May 20 13:55:14 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu May 21 12:46:44 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[didn't like it, even though Seiichi Hayashi is one of my favorite illustrators.  but I gave it one more star for at least trying to do something different.  I think it was a little outdated in its stylistic<br/>experimentation.. like it was trying to do early modernism all over<br/>again, but from the 1970s.  I think that the piecemeal (parts looking silkscreened, some futurist-looking experiments) borrowing kept it from being aesthetically convincing.  I wasn't moved by the story and I also<br/>didn't find it interesting.  I think some people try to inject super<br/>emotional storylines into a cold modernist aesthetic to make the story<br/>seem epic, and I don't think it worked in this case.<br/><br/>Usually Hayashi's commercial illustrations are sort of &quot;pretty-pretty&quot; in a way that doesn't make you think.  I'm not saying he has to draw in this style for this to have been a better comic.  I think inherently the story and concept weren't unique enough to make this anything but a chore.]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/56773017]]></url>
</review>

</GoodreadsResponse>