<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	<review id="56411665">
    <user id="351034">
    <name><![CDATA[Eric]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Elkridge, MD]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/351034-eric]]></url>
    
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1104724</id>
  <isbn>1598560131</isbn>
  <isbn13>9781598560138</isbn13>
  <ratings_count type="integer">8</ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">4</text_reviews_count>
  <title>Heresies and How to Avoid Them</title>
  <average_rating></average_rating>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1181019939m/1104724.jpg</image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1104724.Heresies_and_How_to_Avoid_Them</link>
<author>
  <id type="integer">299474</id>
  <name>Ben Quash</name>
  <ratings_count type="integer">9</ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">4</text_reviews_count>
</author>
</book>

    <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="christian" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sun Jun 07 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sun May 17 16:40:20 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Jun 07 16:14:20 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Mildly informative.  Each chapter in the book is written by a different contributor.  While the fresh perspectives (though in general concurrence with each other) is nice, the book doesn't accomplish all that it could if it were written by one author.  Each chapter contained its own introduction - not just to the topic, but to the author's stance on the general topic of heresy.  Many chapters covered the specific heresy only tangentially, instead focusing on the soapbox du jour of the contributor, using the actual topic as a foil for their somewhat related points.  That said, the concept of the book was good - it just needs to be re-done.]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/56411665]]></url>
</review>

</GoodreadsResponse>