<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	<review id="52029211">
    <user id="2179937">
    <name><![CDATA[Sharon]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Seaside, CA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2179937-sharon-shannon]]></url>
    
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">104737</id>
  <isbn>0006514944</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780006514947</isbn13>
  <ratings_count type="integer">1813</ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">147</text_reviews_count>
  <title>A Monstrous Regiment of Women (Mary Russell, #2)</title>
  <average_rating></average_rating>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1171524254m/104737.jpg</image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/104737.A_Monstrous_Regiment_of_Women</link>
<author>
  <id type="integer">6760</id>
  <name>Laurie R. King</name>
  <ratings_count type="integer">22143</ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">2569</text_reviews_count>
</author>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>true</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Oct 13 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Apr 08 22:25:22 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Oct 14 15:39:56 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[After being bowled over by The Beekeeper's Apprentice, I was somewhat disappointed with this second installment.<br/><br/>First, it lost a star because I don't care for polemic in the guise of fiction. The preachy feminist broadstrokes are a bit annoying at times, resembling lectures rather than entertainment. (Ease off on the hammer, please.)<br/><br/>Secondly, the mystery itself is inhibited by the insertion of the villain much too late in the story. There is no way to look back and have the thrill of saying, &quot;Yeah! I could have/should have seen that coming all along--what a great twist!&quot; When Mary suddenly starts referring to capital-H &quot;Him&quot;, it's abrupt instead of intriguing. There is no clue given to the complicity of other members of Margery's organization, so when they are named it is parenthetical rather than revelatory.<br/><br/>I am not buying Mary's record-breaking recovery from her ordeal. Even she is not superhuman. She bounces back much too quickly and is off leaping tall buildings at a single bound, so to speak.<br/><br/>On a positive note, it is refreshing to see an author avoid the all-too-expected cheap shot against people of faith. Having Margery be evil would have been too easy. Making her complex instead--a dimensional personalty-is one of the book's strong points. I am overjoyed that Russell and Holmes have at last settled the question and confirmed their partnership.<br/><br/>All in all, AMRoW was enjoyable and a page-turner.I've been waiting a long time to get this book and am happy I can now get on with the rest of the series.]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/52029211]]></url>
</review>

</GoodreadsResponse>