Nicholas Whyte's Reviews > Coriolanus

Coriolanus by William Shakespeare
Rate this book
Clear rating

's review
Apr 08, 2009[return][return]his is the only Shakespeare play I have yet encountered which deals with the vicissitudes of electoral politics (though really only in a couple of scenes in the second act). Caius Marcius, a Roman general in the early years of the Republic, is given the surname Coriolanus after leading a successful military campaign against the neighbouring Volscii (and capturing the town of Corioli). Back in Rome, he is persuaded by his family to enter politics, but can barely endure the humiliation of asking the common people for their votes. They vote for him anyway, but are easily persuaded not only to change their minds but to exile him from Rome because of his arrogant behaviour.[return][return]Coriolanus throws his lot in with his former enemies, the Volsci, and leads them in turn to military success against his home city. He appears implacable in his new allegiance, until his family again appear and persuade him to work for peace instead. He returns to Antium, the Volsci capital, with a peace treaty; the Volsci general Aufidius, unimpressed by this latest shift of allegiance, has him killed on the spot, and the play ends.[return][return]Coriolanus is not a very likeable hero, and unlike some of Shakespeare's other problematic heroes, there's not a lot of mystery or suspense about his actions. He is arrogant and proud, and prefers fighting battles to fighting elections. At the same time he is a sucker for the wishes of his wife and mother, who talk him into politics in the first place, and then talk him out of attacking Rome at the end. An inspired director and actor could no doubt make something memorable of it, but it's tough material to work with.[return][return]Shakespeare doesn't seem to be a big fan of electoral democracy. The voters are shown as fickle, agreeing with the person who last shouted at them, easily manipulated by Coriolanus' enemies, who have deliberately set him up for failure, humiliation and exile (and then get their just deserts in terms of military disaster and civil chaos). Coriolanus however is not a good man struggling with an evil system; he is a vain man who is easily outmanSuvred by the leaders of the democratc faction.[return][return]The most interesting of the other characters are Aufidius, the Volscian general, Menenius, Coriolanus' friend in Rome, and Volumnia, his mother. Arkangel has decently solid performances in all four main parts (Paul Jesson, Martin Marquez, Ewan Hooper, Marjorie Yates). Clive Brill, the director, has had a good idea for the soundscape which doesn't quite work: the Volsci are Yorkshiremen, and the incidental music is therefore all in colliery brass band style. The resonances would have been better if Rome had sounded musically distinct from the Volscian territories; also I think the Westminster/Yorkshire split is a poor parallel for the Roman/Volscian of the story - English/Welsh might have been better. (And the minor characters have accents from all over the place: Aufidius has two very camp servants, one from the Home Counties and the other from Scotland.) He's limited, of course, by the audio format: on the stage you could have a dozen different ways of distinguishing between them visually, and let them talk however they liked.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Coriolanus.
Sign In »

No comments have been added yet.