<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	<review id="50135197">
    <user id="403441">
    <name><![CDATA[Kathy]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[San Francisco, CA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/403441-kathy]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="fiction" />
        <shelf name="reviewed" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sun Mar 22 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Mar 22 21:08:33 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Mar 22 21:49:27 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I read this over the weekend -- it was difficult to get into at first because I'd just finished _Lost in the City_.  Eliot's use of language is so different from the contemporary Edward P. Jones' use of words.  Long sentences that I had to read over and over again to get all the meaning out of.  The first sentence in my little mass market sized book (so pages are small) covers over 6 lines.  And you had to get used to the archaic use of &quot;nor&quot; for &quot;than&quot;.  I learned some new vocabulary though.<br/><br/>But don't let that discourage you because it was a wonderful book!  And once I got used to Eliot's style, the book was easy to read.  This is a book full of little morals and Eliot does a great job of portraying some dramatic scene then summing up in a few sentences the nature of humans in relation to preceding moments in such a perfect way that you jab your finger into the book and say, &quot;Yes! Yes! That's spot on!&quot;<br/><br/>I think the entire book boils down to love/selflessness versus greed/selfishness.  I'm a sentimentalist so I like how it turns out.<br/><br/>Side note: I found it terribly funny that he had a character (a very minor character only named once in the novel) named Ann Coulter who had a retarded child (p15).]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/50135197]]></url>
</review>

</GoodreadsResponse>