John's Reviews > David Copperfield

David Copperfield by Charles Dickens
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
2143689
's review
Mar 24, 09

bookshelves: ownebook, to-reread
Read in March, 2009, read count: 1

I finished reading David Copperfield on the Kindle a few days ago.

I’m not an English major, and so I’m not going to pretend to be one. I’m not going to discuss what themes the book touches on, what category it fits in, or generally dissect it to the point where it’s more monotonous than fun.

I read the book because I wanted to, not because I had to write a paper about it.

I must say, first of all, that this has got to be one of the best books I’ve ever read. The vivid descriptions of the characters were just fun to read. One particularly meek man was described like this: “He was so extremely conciliatory in his manner that he seemed to apologize to the very newspaper for taking the liberty of reading it.”

Some of the scenes in the novel are amazingly vivid and memorable. The hilarious and tense scene towards the end where one of the main villains is taken down was one, and of course just about every scene involving David’s aunt is too.

Dickens is a master of suspense. He does it through subtle premonitions in the book. You might not even really notice them as you’re reading. But it sure had an effect on me: I had trouble putting the book down, and stayed up later than I should have on more than one night to keep reading another chapter or three.

Like any good book, this one left me to think even after I was done reading it, and left me wanting to read it again. Right now.

There are some practical downsides to it, though. It was written in the 1850s, and some of the vocabulary and British legal, business, and monetary discussions are strange to a modern casual American audience. Nevertheless, with the exception of the particularly verbose Mr. Micawber, you can probably make it through without a dictionary, though one will be handy. I read it on the Kindle, which integrates a dictionary and makes it very easy to look up words. I learned that a nosegay is a bouquet of showy flowers. And that Mr. Micawber was fond of using words obsolete since the 17th century, according to the Kindle. If you remember that “pecuniary emoluments” refers to a salary, you’ll be doing OK.

The other thing that occasionally bugged me was that the narrator (David) would comment on some sort of gesture, or comment that wasn’t very direct, and then say something like, “But she didn’t need to be more explicit, because I understood the meaning perfectly.” Well, sometimes I didn’t. Though I usually figured it out after a bit. I was never quite sure if Dickens was being intentionally needling to the reader, or if an 1850s British reader would have figured out the meaning perfectly well. But that was part of the fun of it, I think.

This review also posted on my blog at http://changelog.complete.org/archive...
19 likes · likeflag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read David Copperfield.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-1)




dateUp_arrow    newest »

Carlie 'He was so extremely conciliatory in his manner that he seemed to apologize to the very newspaper for taking the liberty of reading it'

I know, I know. This book is so filled with these just beautiful sentences. Makes me want to read them out loud over and over again. I'll never forget the one about his eyes opening to the world after his father's had closed upon it to describe his posthumous birth. Poetry is the only way I can describe it. It's mental calisthenics, a verbal ballet, word nirvana, I could go on and on. Just beautiful.


back to top