Nikki's Reviews > City of Saints and Madmen

City of Saints and Madmen by Jeff VanderMeer
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
223837
's review
Mar 27, 09

bookshelves: speculative-fiction, fantasy
Read in March, 2009

Confession: I didn't actually read all of the appendix of this. I intend to finish it some day, but it's not the kind of book I feel like I can sit down and just blitz on through. The... bittiness annoys me: I do like short stories/novellas, but this isn't the easiest collection to read.

The comparisons between Perdido Street Station and this book are obvious. I felt the cities were characters in both books -- more clearly so in this book, where there's no single recurring, central character. It's an interesting collection of stories with all kinds of different tones and styles and genres, even, all centred around the fictional city of Ambergris. The writing and descriptions are quite rich, and you build up a very clear mental image of this city.

Ignoring the appendix, there are four stories:

Dradin, In Love -- This one was richest in very visual descriptions of the city. I kind of felt overwhelmed, a bit thrown in at the deep end, but I did like the descriptions. It was also the most straightforward short story -- not masquerading as anything else. The ending was weird, and clever, but also kind of predictable.

The Hoegbotton Guide to the Early History of Ambergris -- This was slightly drier, masquerading as a sort of history pamphlet. The footnotes made me laugh, but it was kind of irritating to go back and forth between text and footnotes. The style was clever, but the story wasn't as enjoyable as the first one.

The Transformation of Martin Lake -- This combined story-telling with a sort of... art criticism thing. Again, clever, and more interesting because there was also normal short story narrative. It kind of discusses misinterpretations of art and rolls its metaphorical eyes at people who pretend they understand author intent through psychoanalysing them.

The Strange Case of X -- At this point it felt like it was "too clever by half". Which is how I generally feel about authors appearing in their texts, so perhaps that isn't an unexpected reaction from me. It was kind of obvious to me, and yeah, it's a clever story device but it also wasn't that surprising. Not so much world-building or anything, just pure "lookit my clever plot device, look!".

Appendix -- Stuff related to the previous story. Some of it is interesting, some of it not, for me.
2 likes · Likeflag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read City of Saints and Madmen.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

03/20/2009 page 31
6.25% "So far, mostly description and set up. Intriguing enough."
03/22/2009 page 75
15.12% "I liked this first story. It's weiiird. Vivid world though."
03/22/2009 page 131
26.41% "The footnotes were somewhat annoying..."
03/24/2009 page 183
36.9% "I don't know how I feel about the last short story. Misinterpretation of art?"
03/25/2009 page 218
43.95% "That was a weird story. Onto the appendix!"
show 1 hidden update…

Comments (showing 1-2 of 2) (2 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Dan (new) - rated it 4 stars

Dan Schwent The Strange Case of X was easily my least favorite story in the book. The ending was predictable and the whole story had the "look at me, I'm ever so clever" vibe you mentioned. The King Squid thing in the appendix reminded me of a Monty Python sketch for some reason.




Nikki Yes, it felt like it had suddenly gone away from focus on the city focus on being clever.


back to top