<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	<review>
  <id>49775065</id>
    <user>
    <id>751680</id>
    <name><![CDATA[David]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Washington, DC]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/751680-david]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">4216241</id>
  <isbn>0393065146</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780393065145</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">43</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Panic: The Story of Modern Financial Insanity]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1255580250m/4216241.jpg</image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/4216241.Panic_The_Story_of_Modern_Financial_Insanity</link>
  <average_rating>3.48</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>135</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>A masterful account of today's money  culture, showing how the underpricing of risk  leads to catastrophe.</strong>  <p>When it comes to markets, the first deadly sin is greed. Michael Lewis is our jungle guide  through five of the most violent and costly  upheavals in recent financial history: the crash of '87, the Russian default (and the subsequent  collapse of Long-Term Capital Management), the  Asian currency crisis of 1999, the Internet  bubble, and the current sub-prime mortgage  disaster. With his trademark humor and brilliant anecdotes, Lewis paints the mood and market  factors leading up to each event, weaves  contemporary accounts to show what people  thought was happening at the time, and then,  with the luxury of hindsight, analyzes what  actually happened and what we should have  learned from experience.</p>  &lt;p /&gt;  <p>As he  proved in <em>Liar's Poker</em>, <em>The New  New Thing</em>, and <em>Moneyball</em>, Lewis is without peer in his understanding of market  forces and human foibles. He is also, arguably,  the funniest serious writer in America.</p> .]]>
  </description>
<authors>
    <author>
    <id>776</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Michael Lewis]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/authors/1218743877p5/776.jpg]]></image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/776.Michael_Lewis]]></link>
    <average_rating>4.00</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>11125</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>1849</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors></book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
    
      <shelf name="read" />
    
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Mar 19 10:18:22 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Mar 19 10:27:48 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Interesting, well-chosen collection of newspaper and magazine pieces, a couple by the editor but most of them not, from before/during/after some recent business/$-related crises (oct. 1987 stock market crash, Asian markets crash late 90's, tech bubble of 2000 or so, housing bubble, subprime mortgages......).  Nice balance in that it's not absolutely current, which means there is a chance with hindsight to get a better perspective on what happened, how bad it got, how long it took to recover, etc., but a lot of the topics/patterns/institutions are still relevant.  <br/><br/>I'm finding that a lot of the TV/newspaper journalism about current crisis is either bogged down in the hour-by-hour changes (&quot;how will businesses react to the Fed's decision of this morning? Let's hear some speculation from one alarmist and one reassuring, avuncular person.....&quot;) or at the other extreme (much like my &quot;no Lionel Richie&quot; policy guideline for managing the car radio in the 1980's, I now manage my attention by discontinuing my reading of any article that brings up the Dutch tulip craze of the 1600's).  This book avoids either extreme.  To a large extent it's reassuring, in that you can see from the contemporaneous writing that people really thought the economic world was coming to an end, whereas markets eventually stabilized and recovered.  For time being, I'll take comfort in this.<br/><br/><br/><br/>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/49775065]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/49775065]]></link>
</review>

</GoodreadsResponse>