<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	<review id="48869716">
    <user id="63076">
    <name><![CDATA[Rory]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Oak Park, IL]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/63076-rory]]></url>
    
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">2341767</id>
  <isbn>0393066274</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780393066272</isbn13>
  <ratings_count type="integer">119</ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">52</text_reviews_count>
  <title>Physics for Future Presidents: The Science Behind the Headlines</title>
  <average_rating></average_rating>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1255634030m/2341767.jpg</image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2341767.Physics_for_Future_Presidents_The_Science_Behind_the_Headlines</link>
<author>
  <id type="integer">2053884</id>
  <name>Richard A. Muller</name>
  <ratings_count type="integer">131</ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">55</text_reviews_count>
</author>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[people who follow the news]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Wed Jul 01 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Mar 10 19:22:19 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Jul 16 09:18:02 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[As the author claims, these chapters are NOT fully fleshed-out surveys of fact (or even fully argued arguments), but rather snippets, suggestions, predictions and synthesized summaries. In other words, they're lite lectures about heavy topics (energy, global warming, terrorism), which was right up my alley for some summer nonfiction reading. A few times, I had to stop myself from totally buying into what he was saying (I tend to be too easily persuaded by physicists who can produce a fun bit of trivia or particularly dismissive jibe, apparently), as it's clear from the get-go he has a very unique way of looking at stuff.<br/><br/>Anyway, it's fascinating and you should probably read it. Brock's into the podcasts, I think.]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/48869716]]></url>
</review>

</GoodreadsResponse>