Kate's Reviews > The Namesake

The Namesake by Jhumpa Lahiri

by
1296744
's review
Mar 13, 09

bookshelves: fiction

I liked the first 40 pages or so. I was very interested in the scenes in India and the way the characters perceived the U.S. after they moved. But soon I found myself losing interest. There were several problems. One is that Lahiri's novelistic style feels more like summary ("this happened, then this, then this") rather than a story I can experience through scenes. The voice was flat, and this was exacerbated by the fact that it's written in present tense. I never emotionally connected to these characters. I also got bored with the second half that focused on lots of rich, young New Yorkers sitting around drinking wine.

I haven't read her two story collections, but I've heard she's a phenomenal short story writer--so I'll definitely give those a try. Seems like some fantastic short story writers (like Aimee Bender and Alice Munro) are pressured to write novels when in fact they are brilliant at the story. It's like asking a surgeon to be an attorney.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Namesake.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-2 of 2) (2 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

Ruth Seeley I found both Gogol's and Sonia's about-face after their father's death rather unconvincing - we needed more for that to be believable. I would have liked to see less expository exploration of the mother's character - and more depth to the portrayal of the father - the glimpses we got of him once Gogol became the main character were tantalizing. I found it a rather frustrating read.


message 2: by Susan (new) - added it

Susan Patrick I have read 150 pages if the novel and I agree with you. She does write in summary form. The reader has no genuine sense of being in this book. Eight months in Calcutta I should have felt I was there. Not so!


back to top