<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	<review id="47394650">
    <user id="42066">
    <name><![CDATA[Lynecia]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Bronx, NY]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/42066-lynecia]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>true</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Feb 24 00:00:00 -0800 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Feb 24 12:21:15 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Feb 24 12:30:35 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[As a life-long lover of Lucky (ok, maybe not life long, but you gotta love the alitteration of that statement), I thought I'd be in fashion-induced euphoria once I got my hands on this manual but alas, I closed it after decidedly underwhelmed. <br/>My style (and no, I'm not the most stylish girl on the block)is not really inclined toward any of the categories that they dare the reader to &quot;master.&quot; And my guess is, there are lots of other women who don't fit in to, nor really have an interest in fitting into any of these boxes. <br/>It was good at what LUCKY is always good at--wonderful presentation,creative ways of putting clothes together, finding knockout pieces, and talking to the reader in the happy, sometimes hyperbolic and adjective heavy language of fashion it is famous for--basically, these girls know their shit, but it just didn't hit the mark for me. <br/>One redeeming point for me came at the end when they had Lucky staffers model combos of each style and that was where I found the most interest. <br/>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/47394650]]></url>
</review>

</GoodreadsResponse>