<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	<review>
  <id>41770768</id>
    <user>
    <id>1734279</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Grant]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Palm Springs, CA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1734279-grant]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1227160960p3/1734279.jpg]]></image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">3090529</id>
  <isbn>0061431389</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780061431388</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">127</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[How the States Got Their Shapes]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg</image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3090529.How_the_States_Got_Their_Shapes</link>
  <average_rating>3.19</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>248</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[Why does Oklahoma have that panhandle? Did someone make a mistake?<br/><br/>We are so familiar with the map of the United States that our state borders seem as much a part of nature as mountains and rivers. Even the oddities&#8212;the entire state of Maryland(!)&#8212;have become so ingrained that our map might as well be a giant jigsaw puzzle designed by Divine Providence. But that's where the real mystery begins. Every edge of the familiar wooden jigsaw pieces of our childhood represents a revealing moment of history and of, well, humans drawing lines in the sand. <em>How the States Got Their Shapes</em> is the first book to tackle why our state lines are where they are. Here are the stories behind the stories, right down to the tiny northward jog at the eastern end of Tennessee and the teeny-tiny (and little known) parts of Delaware that are not attached to Delaware but to New Jersey.<br/><em>How the States Got Their Shapes</em> examines:<br/><br/>-Why West Virginia has a finger creeping up the side of Pennsylvania<br/>-Why Michigan has an upper peninsula that isn't attached to Michigan<br/>-Why some Hawaiian islands are not Hawaii<br/>-Why Texas and California are so outsized, especially when so many Midwestern states are nearly identical in size<br/><br/>Packed with fun oddities and trivia, this entertaining guide also reveals the major fault lines of American history, from ideological intrigues and religious intolerance to major territorial acquisitions. Adding the fresh lens of local geographic disputes, military skirmishes, and land grabs, Mark Stein shows how the seemingly haphazard puzzle pieces of our nation fit together perfectly.]]>
  </description>
<authors>
    <author>
    <id>2909664</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Mark Stein]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/2909664.Mark_Stein]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.19</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>250</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>128</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors></book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
    
      <shelf name="read" />
    
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sat Jan 03 00:00:00 -0800 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Jan 03 17:26:57 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Jan 03 17:57:27 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[A fun read. I'm a geography geek, so I dig the descriptions associated with the detail maps. My main gripe is that in spite of, or because of, the logical, alphabetical organization of the book, it's rather repetitive. If you're just reading about a few specific states, that's no problem, but the author seems to expect readers to go from cover to cover because of the &quot;don't skip this&quot; introduction. So why all the repetition about issues like the origin of the 42nd parallel as a border in several state chapters? It's a waste of space when he could have paid more attention to such topics as the incentive for Maryland and Virginia to donate their lands to create the District of Columbia or why the western boundaries of the Oklahoma and Texas panhandles are not aligned. Also, instances in chapter introductions such as the &quot;wouldn't it be better if that western triangle of Maryland was (sic) a part of West Virginia&quot; shouldn't be asked if they're not going to be addressed in the chapter itself.]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/41770768]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/41770768]]></link>
</review>

</GoodreadsResponse>