Isa's Reviews > Revealing Eden

Revealing Eden by Victoria Foyt

by
1016831
's review
Jul 27, 12

bookshelves: dystopia, young-adult, awful, racist, ugh-a-love-triangle, read-2012
Recommended for: racists, people who are blind to their privilege
Read in July, 2012

Originally posted at Bookmarks.

This book was one of the most racist things I have ever read.
The bare bones of the plot: a world where black people are the oppressing majority and white people are the oppressed minority. Obviously, the concept isn't new. It was done - and well done, at that - by Malorie Blackman in her Noughts and Crosses series. If you're interested in the premise, but you dislike blatant racist propaganda, give that one a try.

You could assume this reversal would serve to de-construct issues surrounding racism (as happened in Blackman's books). You'd be wrong. The way this goes about reads more like, "how can we make everyone care about the racism POC have to endure? I know! Let's get a pretty, blond, white girl to go through that!" It's a mockery, a dystopian what-if, with all its horrors, of what is a reality to POC to this very day.

Foyt doesn't just reverse social roles, as Blackman did, she comes up with a dystopian, post-apocalyptic future in which solar radiation ("The Great Meltdown") killed almost everyone - except most black people.
Even though UV radiation's effects on the immune system and eyes are independent of race, and it's never clearly explained how humanity managed to survive in a world where flora and fauna have been decimated - the ever present holograms, as far as I know, won't fill your belly or keep you from getting rickets. But moving on.

This book is so messed up that I honestly need to give examples so people don't accuse me of making it up. So...

"Had Peach forgotten that Eden’s skin only had a dark coating? Maybe she was passing, after all. Wouldn’t that be nice?"

The book starts off with black face and I'm not even going to touch that one, because it's too obvious to anyone with a functional brain. In this book, the author goes so far as to have "a band of Coals" known as "The Lost Caucasians" performing in whiteface. I'm also not going to go off on how problematic the whole issue of passing is. Anyone with the bare minimum knowledge of history already knows it. The author addresses it only as problematic insofar as it is just another way the protagonist fails to see how beautiful she really is. I mean... I mean, really. I don't even know anymore.

"She was a lowly Pearl, worth nothing in a world ruled by dark-skinned Coals."

I'm sure that, if asked, Foyt would have a very witty justification for "Coals" - the way she chose to term the black majority in the book. Exposure to solar radiation will make you perish of "The Heat", and those who survive it are the "Coals" - hahaha, get it?
Too bad that when in context - in this case, comparing it to what other races are called - "Coals" is still insulting. Get this, the extinct albinos are "Cottons" (I swear I'm not making this up to better showcase how absurdly racist this is, Foyt really seems to have gone out of her way to be insulting), white people are "Pearls" - of course there are black pearls but let's ignore that and focus on the fact that pearls are precious gems and coals are... coals. So what happened is that, in a dystopia where black people are the ruling class, they chose a derogatory term for themselves? Am I getting this right? Because don't let yourself be fooled, the ruling majority is the one who decides who is who and what is what. So black people decided they would be Coals and white people would be Pearls? Was it a racist naming decision by the author or was it a racist implication that black people are so ignorant they don't even understand the value dissonance of their choice? It's really a choose your flavour of racism issue here.

Don't let this whole naming thing distract you, even though Pearls are the lowest of the low, the protagonist still finds time in her busy schedule of being oppressed to be racist:
"Ashina jumped up and grabbed Eden’s lab coat. “Are you calling me a liar?”
Eden flinched. One of them was touching her. White-hot light exploded in her head. Before she knew it, she blurted out an incendiary racial slur.
“Get your hands off of me, you damn Coal!”
"
Can you imagine how this would work out in the real world - I don't even need to add, "back when...", I mean now.

"Because of [Eden's father] high intelligence scores, they had overlooked his race and given him the position of lead scientist at Resources for Environmental Adaptation, or REA. He even had secured Eden a plum researcher’s job at the lab. They were the only Pearls allowed to work there."

Never mind that brilliant POC find their paths barred when they try to make it in Academia today, not even worth mentioning how POC scientists were treated in the real world social period corresponding to this novel. The fact that her father is a "Pearl" but still the lead scientist is, by itself, unbelievable, not only that but he managed to get his 17 year old daughter a position in a top scientific facility. But let us set aside the absurd to explore the ever popular "white man saves the day" aspect of it, shall we? I mean, really, even in a world where they are at the bottom of the social ladder, and all but extinct, the white protagonists still manage to save the "ignorant" POC. Well done. And it gets worse:

"Eden might be powerless, but she smiled at the secret knowledge that she was one of only three people who understood how he was about to change the world, and possibly, even save it."
Not only do white people save the day, but the POC don't just lack the ability to save themselves, they lack the very capacity to even understand how it happens at all.

"If Eden wasn't mated in six months when she turned eighteen—the deadline for girls—she'd be cut off from Basic Resources, and left outside to die."

Why? Why provide this incentive for the reproduction of a race deemed inferior? Let's take a look at how that worked out in the real world. African slaves who their owners thought were no better than animals, were bred as such, to make strong slaves, thus serving a purpose to their exploiting oppressors. However, in this world, "Pearls" don't seem to fare too well. Their position would be even less regarded than Native populations back in the day, I mean, at least the Natives didn't just up and die if left on their own as Pearls do - and what happened to Natives under the colonizers? Genocide, that's what. They scattered them, took away their lands and resources, took the children away from their parents to effectively destroy their culture and, to this day they are extremely oppressed. There are no incentives given to rebuild their great nations, be it in the US, be it in Canada, be it in Australia, Native populations are always amongst the poorest.
But I guess the "Pearls" would have to "get mated" because how can you have a YA book without the heroine discovering that her reason to go on is finding and keeping a man? Unthinkable.

Bramford, her boss and potential romantic interest has skin "the color of storm clouds" so I don't know if Foyt was being poetic and saying he was dark, or being insulting and saying he was ashy to the nth degree, like, "That dude really needs some lotion, his skin... storms a brewing. You see that man and he only makes sense in a production of The Tempest, hovering overhead".

Jamal (of course, he'd be named Jamal, of course) "My Dark Prince" (Eden's words, not mine), her other love interest "Unlike most of his kind, he was colorblind" - I don't know how, in this day and age, an author - therefore a person who knows how to read - has not yet grasped the concept that being "colorblind" regarding race is, in fact, racist. You have to be in a position of privilege to have the option to ignore race, if you check your privilege you will not say ignorant things like, "I don't see race." Really, it's not a complicated concept.

Eden, as a character, is horrible. Whiny, racist, full of self hatred and always expecting her problems will be solved by her "Dark Prince" who always calls her "Little Bunny" and "pet" and despite this she can't wait to be mated to him and have his babies. I thought it unlikely he'd be interested in her, considering her personality alone all issues of race aside (view spoiler)[and of course he was only using her, but it's hard to feel bad for her because she was only using him as well. (hide spoiler)]

And if all this mess wasn't bad enough there was some bestiality sprinkled on top of the whole thing.

By the way, I think Foyt forgot something in her list of "thank yous":

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Revealing Eden.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-25 of 25) (25 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

message 1: by kayla (new)

kayla omg u read it?!?! WHAT IS WRONG WITH U ISA


message 2: by Isa (new) - rated it 1 star

Isa the need to hate from an informed position carried me through.


message 3: by Susana (new)

Susana Okay, acabei de fazer uma grande idiotice. Retirei o livro da minha lista de livros a ler, e é claro que os comentários que fizemos foram pelo "cano abaixo" :(
Obrigada Isa pelo aviso. Realmente, comprar este livro, seria deitar dinheiro à rua.


message 4: by Isa (new) - rated it 1 star

Isa lol ainda bem que disseste isso porque eu andava à procura dos comentários e pensava que estava a dar em maluca - assim não faz mal.
E o livro em si, mesmo ignorando o racismo todo (que é extremamente difícil porque o racismo é 99,99% do livro), nem sequer é nada de jeito...
A gaja de 17 anos (mas mais parece ter 12) apaixona-se pelo chefe do pai quando ele se transforma em jaguar... tipo... ok. Mesmo muito mau.


message 5: by Susana (new)

Susana Estou a ver. Bem, para ler sobre tipos que se transformam em jaguar, fico-me pela série "psy-changeling" da Nalini Singh. E livros racistas, dispenso.


The UHQ Nasanta Wonderful review! When I first heard about it, that is the exact film I was thinking of! I couldn't remember the title though. Thanks!


message 7: by Rachel (new)

Rachel I'm offended by the fact that this dystopian future sounds so much like Planet of the Apes, down to the "Get your hands off me, you damn (dirty ape) Coal!" line.

Seriously, WTF was the author smoking when she decided to pen this nonsense?


message 8: by Amanda (new)

Amanda So many people have alluded to it...I need to know what the bestiality element is! Please? Also thanks for a review that quoted bits of the book. That will help in discussing with people what's wrong with it.


message 9: by Isa (new) - rated it 1 star

Isa Rachel wrote: "I'm offended by the fact that this dystopian future sounds so much like Planet of the Apes, down to the "Get your hands off me, you damn (dirty ape) Coal!" line.

Omg, you're right. I hadn't even thought of that. Wow, it's even more racist than it already was, I didn't think it was possible...


message 10: by Isa (new) - rated it 1 star

Isa Amanda wrote: "So many people have alluded to it...I need to know what the bestiality element is! Please? Also thanks for a review that quoted bits of the book. That will help in discussing with people what's wr..."

SPOILERS!!! (obviously) Anyway, her boss, a guy whom Eden hates in every way (and actually with good reason, since he is awful) volunteers for an experimental treatment which turns him into a jaguar. As soon as he is an animal Eden gets all ~hot and bothered~. Somehow, turning into a jaguar is the salvation to the human race or... honestly the plot makes no sense. But yeah, that's the bestiality part. Really, any time he is a jaguar she wants him.


message 11: by Amanda (new)

Amanda Isa wrote: "Amanda wrote: "So many people have alluded to it...I need to know what the bestiality element is! Please? Also thanks for a review that quoted bits of the book. That will help in discussing with p..."

Wow! Thanks for filling me in. That's....wow. And here I thought the book couldn't get any *worse* lol.


message 12: by pdbkwm (new)

pdbkwm "Before she knew it, she blurted out an incendiary racial slur.
“Get your hands off of me, you damn Coal!”"

--

I'm a bit confused at this part. If The black people of this novel named themselves Coal and everyone calls them Coals, then how is Eden calling her a Coal a racial slur? Unless the damn is what makes it even more racist then it really is?

When I read the other reviews for this, I was tempted to read the novel because I tend to love reading books with a lot of bad reviews. I'm a sucker for punishment. But your review is making me rethink that.

Noughts and Crosses sounds good, thank you for the recommendation.

ps. The three Coals you mentioned in the review seemed to have very stereotypical black names. Do all the coals have those kinds of names in the book?


message 13: by Isa (new) - rated it 1 star

Isa pdbkwm wrote: "I'm a bit confused at this part. If The black people of this novel named themselves Coal and everyone calls them Coals, then how is Eden calling her a Coal a racial slur? Unless the damn is what makes it even more racist then it really is?"

Either it was just bad writing (which is possible, considering the whole book), or the author just let slip that even she knows Coal is a racist term. Having read the book, either one or even both possibilities are likely.

From what I remember:
Coals: Peach, Ashina, Ronson, Jamal.
Pearls: Eden, Daisy, John, Lily, Emily.

There was an asian (asians are called Ambers, by the way) whose ethnicity was unspecified (I guess they all look alike to the author), he had dragon tattoos and his name was Shen.
And there was an "Indian" "gentle warrior" (who was actually from a Native southern american tribe, but why be politically correct, am I right?) named Lorenzo, and an "Indian woman named Maria.

But, really, there was so much blatant racism that until you pointed it out, apart from Jamal, the names didn't really register.
Another commenter pointed out that the "Get your hands off of me, you damn (...)" is probably an allusion to The Planet of the Apes, that's really obvious, but just so you have an idea of how overwhelmed I was with all the racist crap, I didn't even notice it.


message 14: by The UHQ Nasanta (new)

The UHQ Nasanta *winces*

Wow. What a load of fail.


Chibineko The author has since tried to fix some of this by writing further blogs stating that pearls are seen as useless in this society because you can't eat them or use them for fuel, whereas coal is supposed to be useful. Foyt also tries to explain that Pearls are seen as a drain on limited resources.

The problem with this explanation is that none of this was put in the book. If anything, that shows more failing on the author's part because she shouldn't have to explain stuff like that because she should've put it in the novel to begin with. It should be clear.


message 16: by Isa (new) - rated it 1 star

Isa So her explanation for Pearls was even more nonsensical than the one I gave in a rushed review? Wow. Yeah, pearls are useless. You know what else is useless? Diamonds. She could have named white people diamonds and named black people manure. Manure is useful.

Whether the explanation is in the book or not it has the effect of making the whole thing approximately 0% less racist, so... Clarity in the novel is the least of her problems, imo.


Chibineko LOL! Yeah... her whole explanation holds even less water when she made mention to at least one person wearing a gemstone as a piece of jewelry. (Bramford wore his life ring on his finger, setting a gemstone or something into it.) I think that there were also other mentions of people wearing jewelry, but even so there's mentions of people doing things to make themselves look better, so it'd be likely that people still wore jewelry in general. This means that there would be a market for gemstones and other valuables since the purpose of dressing up has always been to attract a mate and since now everyone's fates depends on them finding someone, jewelry would become even more sought after because of this.

You're absolutely right- it makes it far less racist. It would've been better if she'd at least tried to incorporate this into the book though. Maybe if she'd thought that through then the rest of the book wouldn't have been so terrible.

I still say that anaconda should've eaten her.


message 18: by Loopy (new) - added it

Loopy Chibineko The author has since tried to fix some of this by writing further blogs stating that pearls are seen as useless in this society because you can't eat them or use them for fuel, whereas coal is supposed to be useful.

Actually, that was the first explanation that I came up with in my head - coal is useful (and becoming more expensive and more difficult to get), pearls are trivial in the whole scheme of things.


message 19: by The UHQ Nasanta (last edited Aug 04, 2012 06:51am) (new)

The UHQ Nasanta Isa wrote: "So her explanation for Pearls was even more nonsensical than the one I gave in a rushed review?"

I saw that update in the blog, and to be honest, I didn't think it nonsensical. The reason being, when I first heard about this Pearl/Coal business and the "dystopian" society they were supposed to be in, this was the exact same reasoning that had occurred to me. The reason I didn't think it was nonsensical was that if you think in terms of that world, it makes sense. Dystopian worlds, to me, mean worlds where people have to work harder to survive. People are often depicted as losing technology or such after a great disaster. (Granted, I'm not a huge reader of dystopian YA novels so my perception of dystopian worlds is probably not quite on target, but that's what it seems to me.) Therefore, useful items such as coal would probably be in greater demand than pearls.

This explanation doesn't make sense in our own world where we can afford luxury items like pearls for ornamentation and the like. But in a dystopian world?

Granted, she probably *could* have made it clearer in the book if a lot of people were not able to accept this reasoning.

Edit: @Chibineko: Sounds like the author failed to think out the implications of having the characters wear gemstone jewelry.


message 20: by Ari (new) - rated it 1 star

Ari Rachel wrote: "I'm offended by the fact that this dystopian future sounds so much like Planet of the Apes, down to the "Get your hands off me, you damn (dirty ape) Coal!" line.

Seriously, WTF was the author smok..."


...I feel so ... dirty, that that particular reference didn't occur to me, even though I ALSO thought of Planet of the Apes, when thinking of dystopian fiction about up-ended roles....ugh.


message 21: by Ari (new) - rated it 1 star

Ari pdbkwm wrote: ""Before she knew it, she blurted out an incendiary racial slur.
“Get your hands off of me, you damn Coal!”"
--

I'm a bit confused at this part. If The black people of this novel named themselves C..."


It's confusing because the book itself is confusing, and so are the author's own "explanations." The book's narrative never "truly" clarifies... Because unlike all of the other words (pearl, cotton, amber, tiger's eye), it never out an out says that "Coal" is a "racist word." Instead, there's just the one reference to it being an "incendiary racial slur" that apparently incites all of the "Coals" to want to mob her... >.>

The best I have been able to fathom is that, yes, "Coal" is a racial slur in the universe, and the author thought she was being "clever" when she wrote an "oppressed character" who was "just as racist" towards the dominant class as the dominant class was to her... Because, you know, reverse racism is totally a thing and hating the oppressor class is just as bad as the oppressor class oppressing you and the fact that you hate them is why you are oppressed. ... Because, reasons.


message 22: by Loopy (new) - added it

Loopy Ari wrote: "pdbkwm wrote: ""Before she knew it, she blurted out an incendiary racial slur.
“Get your hands off of me, you damn Coal!”"
--

I'm a bit confused at this part. If The black people of this novel nam..."


It's not always about the actual word that is being used, so much depends on the context - tone of voice, accompanying actions, who is saying it to whom etc. I remember when I was young, my Father was a trade union delegate and he often had to sort out squabbles that arose involving new immigrants - often these new immigrants would be trying to fit in to their work environment and (for example) call another guy a bastard. Sure, it's not a great word to call someone but in that work environment it was totally fine to call a friend that in a lighthearted way, unfortunately, new immigrants didn't have the years of social conditioning and experience to know when it was and wasn't ok and were occasionally thought to be insulting someone when that wasn't their intention. So, back to my point, the word is immaterial, it's the context that's important.


message 23: by Ari (new) - rated it 1 star

Ari Loopy wrote: "Ari wrote: "pdbkwm wrote: ""Before she knew it, she blurted out an incendiary racial slur.
“Get your hands off of me, you damn Coal!”"
--

I'm a bit confused at this part. If The black people of th..."


You do realize you're not actually responding to anything I actually said? I said nothing about the words themselves, in the objective sense. My comment was in fact a context-based analysis of how the words were being used within the text. -_- I am not impressed.


message 24: by Loopy (new) - added it

Loopy huh?
I was just adding to it.


Sharon But why would coal (heat, fire) be useful in a world where The Heat is the greatest threat to life?


back to top