<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	<review id="37364164">
    <user id="1702587">
    <name><![CDATA[Brian]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Greensboro, NC]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1702587-brian]]></url>
  </user>
      <user-statuses>
        <user_status>
  <body></body>
  <chapter type="integer" nil="true"></chapter>
  <comments_count type="integer">0</comments_count>
  <created_at type="datetime">2009-06-14T15:46:20-07:00</created_at>
  <id type="integer">886316</id>
  <last_comment_at type="datetime" nil="true"></last_comment_at>
  <page type="integer">167</page>
  <updated_at type="datetime">2009-06-14T15:46:20-07:00</updated_at>
</user_status>

      </user-statuses>
    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Nov 10 15:20:52 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Jul 30 17:45:32 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I've got mixed feelings about this book. On the one hand, the language was sometimes wonderful, vibrant, fun, and full of energy. At other times I was occasionally annoyed with longer spanish language passages. A word or two interspersed isn't too bad, I can guess from context what is being said, but sometimes the longer sections were problematic.<br/><br/>My other issue is with the structure of the story. I feel like about halfway through it turned down an entirely different path than what I expected. Which isn't necessarily a problem, but in this case I'm not sure if I found the diversion to have any payoff. Therefore what was the purpose of the diversion? Instead I just kept asking myself, when do we get back to the good stuff? And eventually we did, but in between there was a large problem section that I don't think contributed to the story significantly enough to warrant the inclusion of that portion.<br/><br/>Still, there is some wonderful good stuff in the book, and there were sections that really rolled along with a great tone and rhythm. I've had a hard time deciding between three and four stars. I'd probably go with 3.5 if that was an available choice.]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/37364164]]></url>
</review>

</GoodreadsResponse>