☆Jessie☆ (Ageless Pages Reviews)'s Reviews > Earth Unaware
Earth Unaware (The First Formic War, #1)
by Orson Scott Card, Aaron Johnston
by Orson Scott Card, Aaron Johnston
☆Jessie☆ (Ageless Pages Reviews)'s review
bookshelves: arc, netgalley-arc, young-adult-fiction, sci-fi, 2012-reads, 2012-reviews, reviewed, to-infinity-and-beyond, bring-on-the-cliche-parade, all-surface-no-substance
Aug 05, 12
bookshelves: arc, netgalley-arc, young-adult-fiction, sci-fi, 2012-reads, 2012-reviews, reviewed, to-infinity-and-beyond, bring-on-the-cliche-parade, all-surface-no-substance
Read on July 29, 2012
Read This Review & More Like It On My Blog!
Written as a prequel to the well-loved Ender's Game, Johnston's Earth Unaware tries to fill in some of the holes and unexplored history of the "Enderverse" and the first Formic War that led to Battle School, and Ender's adventures in vanquishing the "hormigas"/Formics. When this book works the most, it succeeds predominately on misplaced nostalgia for the earlier-published-but-later-in-the-chronology novels like Ender's Game, Xenophobe, Children of the Mind, etc. I found Earth Unaware to be a weak, ghost-written book that lacks the easy charisma, dynamic characters, and unique storyline that the other books possessed in abundance and which made them so memorable.
There are obviously some good, interesting ideas at play here (the asteroid mining and the cultures that sprout up around them [free miners versus corporations, etc.]) but Aaron Johnston is primarily a graphic novelist, and it shows quite obviously here. Nothing about the novel is realized to its full potential -- from characters to plot to even the action, almost all about Earth Unaware felt contrived, weak, and overdone all at the same time. This is a superficial and shallow adaptation of Ender and the world's backstory, obviously written primarily to lure in fans of Ender's Game and its subsequent sequels. The plot is minimal, the characters are in dire need of more/or a rounded personality (or in Wit's case, a connection to the actual story. His Earth-bound plot will surely coincide with the events of the sequels, but for Earth Unaware, they are more filler than anything else, Mazer Rackham cameo or not.)
Wonky pacing, uneven and unconnected storylines, cliched or predictable characters, and more made this a miss for me. The few things I found interesting were often and quickly glossed over to focus on the less developed ideas and characters. There are people who will absolutely love this and gush over the finally explained and explored first contact with the Formics, but Earth Unaware is nowhere near the league of Ender's Game in any area. This review is much shorter than most, but my disappointment with this and OSC's raging homophobia make it almost impossible for an impartial thought.
When I first read Ender's Game, I was 10. It was my first scifi novel and Ender was a protagonist seemingly created just for me to love. I still love it to this day, but more for nostalgia and my first sense of how powerful children could be than for anything else. It was revelatory: kids can be heroes and save the world too! Now that I'm older, wiser, and more exposed to the kind of hate that OSC regularly spews towards homosexuals, I find myself less and less inclined to pick up anything he's written (or was written for him.) I debated whether or not to even review this (though it's far from a glowing review) because I don't want to promote OSC in any way, shape or form, negatively or not. In this recent climate, among all these debates about author behavior and how it affects readers, I find it hard to justify my read of this/these books. Sure, OSC has never attacked a negative review or reviewer (to my knowledge, but I certainly try to ignore anything that comes out of his mouth at this point), but how authors behave does impact their work and those who read it.
As I was reading Speechless by Hannah Harrington right after this novel, it made me think about silent compliance, ignoring the bad stuff, and just doing what everyone else does for the sake of not making waves. I'm done, I'm gonna make my own wave about this; I just can't support an author who thinks it's right to discriminate against and dehumanize other people. I was granted an ARC of this, but you can bet this author will never see another penny of my cash. I won't be finishing the First Formic War series, and though I thank TOR for the generosity of reading the ARC, even an ARC of the sequel won't tempt me. Goodbye, OSC. I will still reread Ender, but I won't recommend it anyone anymore.
So long, Enderverse, and thanks for all the fish.
Written as a prequel to the well-loved Ender's Game, Johnston's Earth Unaware tries to fill in some of the holes and unexplored history of the "Enderverse" and the first Formic War that led to Battle School, and Ender's adventures in vanquishing the "hormigas"/Formics. When this book works the most, it succeeds predominately on misplaced nostalgia for the earlier-published-but-later-in-the-chronology novels like Ender's Game, Xenophobe, Children of the Mind, etc. I found Earth Unaware to be a weak, ghost-written book that lacks the easy charisma, dynamic characters, and unique storyline that the other books possessed in abundance and which made them so memorable.
There are obviously some good, interesting ideas at play here (the asteroid mining and the cultures that sprout up around them [free miners versus corporations, etc.]) but Aaron Johnston is primarily a graphic novelist, and it shows quite obviously here. Nothing about the novel is realized to its full potential -- from characters to plot to even the action, almost all about Earth Unaware felt contrived, weak, and overdone all at the same time. This is a superficial and shallow adaptation of Ender and the world's backstory, obviously written primarily to lure in fans of Ender's Game and its subsequent sequels. The plot is minimal, the characters are in dire need of more/or a rounded personality (or in Wit's case, a connection to the actual story. His Earth-bound plot will surely coincide with the events of the sequels, but for Earth Unaware, they are more filler than anything else, Mazer Rackham cameo or not.)
Wonky pacing, uneven and unconnected storylines, cliched or predictable characters, and more made this a miss for me. The few things I found interesting were often and quickly glossed over to focus on the less developed ideas and characters. There are people who will absolutely love this and gush over the finally explained and explored first contact with the Formics, but Earth Unaware is nowhere near the league of Ender's Game in any area. This review is much shorter than most, but my disappointment with this and OSC's raging homophobia make it almost impossible for an impartial thought.
And other thoughts:
When I first read Ender's Game, I was 10. It was my first scifi novel and Ender was a protagonist seemingly created just for me to love. I still love it to this day, but more for nostalgia and my first sense of how powerful children could be than for anything else. It was revelatory: kids can be heroes and save the world too! Now that I'm older, wiser, and more exposed to the kind of hate that OSC regularly spews towards homosexuals, I find myself less and less inclined to pick up anything he's written (or was written for him.) I debated whether or not to even review this (though it's far from a glowing review) because I don't want to promote OSC in any way, shape or form, negatively or not. In this recent climate, among all these debates about author behavior and how it affects readers, I find it hard to justify my read of this/these books. Sure, OSC has never attacked a negative review or reviewer (to my knowledge, but I certainly try to ignore anything that comes out of his mouth at this point), but how authors behave does impact their work and those who read it.
As I was reading Speechless by Hannah Harrington right after this novel, it made me think about silent compliance, ignoring the bad stuff, and just doing what everyone else does for the sake of not making waves. I'm done, I'm gonna make my own wave about this; I just can't support an author who thinks it's right to discriminate against and dehumanize other people. I was granted an ARC of this, but you can bet this author will never see another penny of my cash. I won't be finishing the First Formic War series, and though I thank TOR for the generosity of reading the ARC, even an ARC of the sequel won't tempt me. Goodbye, OSC. I will still reread Ender, but I won't recommend it anyone anymore.
So long, Enderverse, and thanks for all the fish.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Earth Unaware.
sign in »
Reading Progress
| 07/29/2012 | page 35 |
|
10.0% | "Eegads, is this dialogue clumsy and weighed down with exposition." |
| 07/29/2012 | page 125 |
|
34.0% | "This is certainly readable, if definitely far from the level of Ender's Game." 6 comments |
| 07/29/2012 | page 279 |
|
76.0% |
""Your scientific mind might be tickled pink at this discovery, but my mind, my logical, practical, reasoning mind, is peeing in his mind pants. " Whaaaaa? O_o" 3 comments |
Comments (showing 1-26 of 26) (26 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Synesthesia
(new)
22 août 13:11
Plus he nags too much anyway about marriage and babies. It's irritating.
reply
|
flag
*
This is very very true. The more I learn about OSC, the less inclined I am to tolerate anything he writes. It's a shame because Ender's Game was a big favorite of mine for years.... but then again, he's never written another novel that I liked half as well as that one.
Yes, there's less frustrating writers out there that tell you a story instead of nag you. I was surprised in the later books I read that a character didn't actually look up from the book and say, "Why are you reading instead of getting married and having babies? GO HAVE SOME BABIES RIGHT NOW AFTER A HETEROSEXUAL MARRIAGE!"I give up. He wrote stuff like Seven Son so well too.
OSC homophobic? You are so up in the night its pathetic. There is a difference between being homophobic and anti "gay marriage" [Not all homosexuals think "gay marriage" is the right way to go]. You've somehow been blinded by irrational prejudice you can't allow for differing opinions.
I am the one blinded by irrational prejudices? I do not think so. I do consider the vitriol OSC constantly says to be homophobic, and as this is my review, I don't feel the need to justify my views to an ignorant troll. If you comment again, I will block you.
Vic, a simple google search of "Orson Scott Card homosexuality/homophobia" shows a ton of shit. Even his wiki page says he's publicly against it. You can easily find his many ranty essays against it without really trying too hard. Try reading "Homosexual 'Marriage' and Civilization", where he claims that homosexuals are only gay because they were raped or suffered abuse.
Thanks Jess, that was perfect. I lack the patience to be so polite and thorough. But your comment shows exactly how dehumanizing and wrong OSC's views are.
I have read OSC's articles and it is amazing to me how people misrepresent what he says. Or did you/Jess just read someone else's misrepresentation and take it as truth. "Homosexuals are only gay because they were raped or suffered abuse"? Hilarious. Yes he is against gay marriage there is no denying that. He has certainly tried to explain some of his reasoning, thoughts and ideas whether adequately or not I am sure there is room for debate. I find it interesting how a differing opinion is "vitriol", and those holding it are "ignorant trolls". Where is the love? The tolerance? I'm not seeing it here. Yes you are certainly entitled to your views [as are we all], misrepresentation just... irk me. Sorry for the intrusion. Feel free to block me. Yours was the first Earth Unaware I saw and knowing OSC as I do as well as some of his friends [homosexual and heterosexual] to call him homophobic is just plain incorrect.
You read my review, didn't like it, and called me pathetic. That qualifies as trolling to me. If you had been polite, or open to debate, that would be a different story with a different outcome. I don't misrepresent what he has said. I don't need to. Adios.
I reached this conclusion too, Jess. Won't be reading more of OSC however much I liked Ender. Excellent review.
This review made me look up OSC's views, and his views made me sad. Normally, I would say a person's views are private and shouldn't effect how you see their work, but when OSC broadcasts them in editorials and on his site, then he does open himself up to offending people and turning them off from his work. I have Ender's Game on my shelf to read, and I'm going to read it, but I know his stance on gay marriage will irk me the entire time.
I'm sorry Vic, but OSC's views are VERY homophobic. I don't understand why I should be tolerant towards a man who spouts out so much hate towards gays. He's gone on and on about how sodomy laws should stay on the books and how allowing gay marriage will destroy the family unit. How? Why are people like me who question this the prejudice ones, the intolerant ones? Should we tolerate racism and sexism too?
This word "tolerance" is always humorous to me. Today, what it really means is this: "I will accept certain things and not others, and both those things, and NO ONE better disagree with me, or I won't tolerate it!"Can we please stop using these buzz words when we don't know what they mean?
http://i.word.com/idictionary/Tolerate
Well, yeah. There's just some things that are not a big deal like gay people, and some things that are like tormenting people for being gay. I'm glad you get that. I'm not going to tolerate people writing into the law that these folks have to have their rights limited because someone else's religion forbids them from being gay. It's not the same thing as saying you cannot have your religion. You can have it, but I do not want it, thank you.
J. wrote: "Just came here to say what Vic said. Thanks Vic."Is there a point to your comment? You're free to have your own opinions, but if all you want to do is stir the pot, I won't waste my time reading what you have to say. You add nothing of value to the discussion, and if you comment again, I will block you.
Synesthesia: <3
Thanks for the review Jessie. I had Enders Game on my to read shelf but when I heard about his kerfluffle on homosexuals awhile ago, he totally turned me off reading his book.
I'm no longer interested in this author's work either. :/ Anyone remember where the word faggot comes from? It's from the time when those very same sodomy laws enabled sadistic people to burn those whose sexual preferences ran contrary to theirs. I won't support an author who is homophobic.
I'm not a fan of that word homophobic either, it insinuates a fear. I don't fear choices I don't agree with.
Dude, if one is obsessed with homosexuality to the point it interferes with them being sensible about it than it is a phobia. Also, it isn't a choice. Who chooses to be gay in Saudi Arabia?
J. wrote: "I'm not a fan of that word homophobic either, it insinuates a fear. I don't fear choices I don't agree with."Jackass. Goodbye.
Great review, Jessie! And I liked how you kept a pretty level head in your review, not the vitriolic "OMG I HATED THIS BOOK IT WAS FUCKING CRAP" etc. etc.Nice job!
Synesthesia wrote: "Dude, if one is obsessed with homosexuality to the point it interferes with them being sensible about it than it is a phobia. Also, it isn't a choice. Who chooses to be gay in Saudi Arabia?"It always amazes me when people insist sexual preference is a choice...has anyone ever actually CHOSEN who they're attracted to?!? Personally, I'm heterosexual, but that's not because I flipped a coin the day I hit puberty and said, "Okay, heads, I dig chicks, tails, I'm into dudes"! Some people are naturally attracted to members of the opposite sex, while others are naturally attracted to the same sex. And then there are people who find themselves naturally attracted to members of both sexes...those lucky devils, they get the best of both worlds!
I found myself making the same decision as many other people on this thread...at first, I wanted to read "Ender's Game", but after reading some of OSC's anti-gay ramblings, I know I won't be able to enjoy his work now, so "Ender's Game" is just collecting dust on my shelf...
People should probably actually read what OSC has to say for himself:http://www.nauvoo.com/library/card-hy...
Those that simply read reviews of his stance are foolish and tend to take things out of context. His views are not accepted by many who feel we should have the right to do whatever we want as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else, but that does not make him homophobic or a hater of gays. It means that he disagrees with a lifestyle. He does not advocate criminalizing homosexuality. He does not want to legalize homosexual marriage, because he does not agree with it. People tend to vote against things which they consider wrong. I'm sure you do the same. If you believe something is harmful to society, then you will be against it at every opportunity, like not buying an author's books anymore.
But we should really cut out the name calling. People disagree, but we don't have to be hateful about it.
Warren wrote: "People should probably actually read what OSC has to say for himself:http://www.nauvoo.com/library/card-hy...
Those that simply read reviews of his stance are foolish and tend to take ..."
For the record, Warren, I did research OSC's statements before making my decision not to read any of his works. In fact, I'm posting a link to an article where his exact words offended me, and they certainly were not taken out of context since I read the entire thing. You're entitled to your opinions, Warren, but I'm also entitled to mine. Personally, I do believe OSC's comments in the attached article about what legalizing gay marriage would supposedly do to "civilization" does indeed qualify as hate-rhetoric...
http://ornery.org/essays/warwatch/200...
Also, no offense, but if you want people to cut out the name-calling, you really shouldn't begin your post by labeling other people foolish...
