Julie's Reviews > The Age of Miracles

The Age of Miracles by Karen Thompson Walker

by
1213607
's review
Aug 23, 12

bookshelves: imagined-worlds, usa-contemporary, read-2012
Read from August 15 to 19, 2012

Look. I don't live in a vacuum. I know this is one of the most talked about books of the summer. Big displays in bookstores, frequent author appearances on my favorite public radio station cultural programming, reviews in my newspapers and journals of choice (that I didn't read - by the way - so I wouldn't spoil my experience). So hard I did try to consider this book on its own merits, without expectations. But I'm human. Given the hype, I'm gonna hope for a miracle.

Okay, maybe not a miracle. But something really extraordinary. Which this isn't. I'm so confused.

In case you DO live in a vacuum, The Age of Miracles, the debut of novelist Karen Thompson Walker, is set in suburban California right about now. The earth's rotation is inexplicably slowing, leading to hours of night, hours of bright day, throwing the universe out of temporal, circadian, climactic whack. Gravity is affected, birds cannot fly, fish cannot swim. Crops fail, cults flourish, communities collapse. But soccer practice goes on.

It's a brilliant premise and Thompson Walker does a superb job of presenting this disaster and its unfolding consequences without miring the book down in scientific explanations. I don't need to know why the slowing is happening; I'm ready to believe that our destruction of the planet can extend into our solar system. I am, therefore, disappointed by the author's heavy-handed foreshadowing. Frequent sentences with "It was the last time we..." or "We never...again..." steal the immediacy of the disaster.

Now that I've read several published reviews, let me dispel the widespread notion this story is told from the point of view of an 11-year old narrator, Julia. No. It isn't. It's told by 20-something Julia, looking back on the first year when the earth's rotation decelerated. Which changes everything this book is suggested to be - a coming of age story, a unique perspective of a young girl as the world begins a slow collapse around her. That misperception is not the author's fault. But by choosing to tell the story from many years' distance, Karen Thompson Walker does present the reader with an unreliable narrator. Are we expected to trust Julia's memory of how her limited community - her neighborhood, her school, her family - reacted to "the slowing"? Even more to the point, because this is a book far more concerned with human nature than its sci-fi premise would suggest, are we to trust older Julia's recounting of the relationships as she observed and participated in them? Had the author truly wanted us to live in Julia's moment, she would have let the little girl speak in her own voice, not via the sophisticated redaction presented by her adult self.

I can't quite figure out if this is meant to be Young Adult fiction. If 11-year old Julia were truly the narrator, I'd say a definitive "Yes". But Julia's voice and her perceptions don't ring true in so young a girl. Given her neighborhood, her home life - she's just not as sophisticated as her 20-something self tries to portray her. Yet, the emotional dimensions of this novel are too simplistic for adult literary fiction. It's all so muddley.

There is some extraordinary writing here.

Chapter One, Page 1

We didn’t notice right away. We couldn’t feel it.

We did not sense at first the extra time, bulging from the smooth edge of each day like a tumor blooming beneath skin. We were distracted back then by weather and war. We had no interest in the turning of the earth. Bombs continued to explode on the streets of distant countries. Hurricanes came and went. Summer ended. A new school year began. The clocks ticked as usual. Seconds beaded into minutes. Minutes grew into hours. And there was nothing to suggest that those hours, too, weren’t still pooling into days, each the same fixed length known to every human being.

But there were those who would later claim to have recognized the disaster before the rest of us did. These were the night workers, the graveyard shifters, the stockers of shelves, and the loaders of ships, the drivers of big- rig trucks, or else they were the bearers of different burdens: the sleepless and the troubled and the sick.

These people were accustomed to waiting out the night. Through bloodshot eyes, a few did detect a certain persistence of darkness on the mornings leading up to the news, but each mistook it for the private misperception of a lonely, rattled mind.


I mean, Holy Cow. But this promises a tension and a sense of dread that aren't sustained. There are too many parts that drone and drag, as minutes are added to the Earth's rotation and Julia's mother adds jars of peanut butter to the stash under the bed.

In the end, this is good entertainment. I can give it a pretty solid (how's that for oxymoronic waffling?) three stars, because I am taken by the dystopian rendering of a world grinding to a halt. But the characters feel dim and insubstantial to me, like memories of a summer fling.









Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Age of Miracles.
sign in »

Reading Progress

08/16/2012 page 792
100.0% "May 1940, Belgium & Netherlands surrender. June 4, Dunkirk falls & German Army barrels through to Paris. Swastika unfurled on Eiffel Tower June 14. France signs Armistice in same spot where German empire capitulated to the West on November 11, 1918. By Hitler's design, of course. From Sept 7 to November 3, 1940, London bombed every night, an average of 200 bombers. Yet here, Hitler fails. He sets sights on Russia." 2 comments
08/19/2012 page 121
45.0% "Not enjoying this overmuch. The foreshadowing is constant & clobbering, while the rest is rather boring. Probably taking too long to read it."
show 1 hidden update…

Comments (showing 1-9 of 9) (9 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

Jennifer Some books are like that. I will be interested to hear what you think once you figure it out.


Michael Pretty thoughtful and subtle review. But now I don't know any better if I want to read it. I want to be entertained, and wouldn't mind remembering a summer fling. And end-of-the-world situations might heigthen reflection on human nature. But the "drag" parts you speak of raise the issue of how much I could tolerate for a good read in other spheres. Dang, negative reviews can be so empowering for avoidance, but ambivalent ones sort of make the hunger worse (fond of apocalypse tales).

But you may have a finger on something that has been bothering me about the distancing I experienced in reading another book with this "redaction" business, Ford's "Canada". Similar case of coverage of crisis events of a 15 year old boy from (you learn later) a retroactive adult timepoint. Have been having trouble formulating a review. In his case, the foreshadowing that undercuts your reading pleasure with "Miracles" starts with the first sentence and seems to be a kind way of avoiding melodrama. Knowing the lead character is going to make it takes away worry about his survival, leaving an interest in "how" and "at what cost". But the business about the older self being an "unreliable" narrator for the younger version may be something to be reckoned with in a lot of books. Great word, redaction!


message 3: by B0nnie (new) - added it

B0nnie I was going to delete this from my to-read list until I noticed it was the WWII Commemorative Edition of The Age of Miracles, lol. Hitler sets his sights on Russia because of the earth's rotation!


Julie Michael wrote: "Pretty thoughtful and subtle review. But now I don't know any better if I want to read it. I want to be entertained, and wouldn't mind remembering a summer fling. And end-of-the-world situations..."

It was interesting to read other reviews, Michael. Some complained mightily about the implausibility of the science, which didn't concern me at all. I'm not a scifi fan, perhaps that's why I could easily suspend disbelief.

I agree- the reads that thrill or infuriate me are the easy ones to review. It's these in-between "it was good...BUT..."

I don't think I did a good job articulating why the narrator's voice troubled me. Most first-person narration is done in retrospective, so the "unreliable" quality is inherent. I think here it was an inauthenticity of character combined with my desire to hear from Julia as an 11 year old, not as her older self remembered her.

Interesting about Canada. It's on my list to read and now I will listen for that voice of past/present.

I am working on a novel - first draft- that's told in first and third person present. We'll see. I love the immediacy of it, of living in "real time" with my characters. Once I start shopping it out to beta readers, I'll have to determine from feedback if this is the right way to go...


Julie B0nnie wrote: "I was going to delete this from my to-read list until I noticed it was the WWII Commemorative Edition of The Age of Miracles, lol. Hitler sets his sights on Russia because of the earth's rotation!"
My red herring review :)


Julie Jennifer wrote: "Some books are like that. I will be interested to hear what you think once you figure it out."

This was a tough one, Jennifer. I really do wonder what about my reaction had I read it before all the hype.


message 7: by Jennifer (last edited Aug 22, 2012 07:02pm) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Jennifer I think another thing about Julia that makes the book sort of difficult is she is just so passive as a character. She doesn't make many choices. Most of them are inspired by someone else saying, "Hey, let's do this" or "Hey, let's not do that," which is really not that thrilling in a protagonist.

I liked that there is never any explanation for the slowing. I am willing to believe in an author's worldbuilding -- and I really want to! -- unless she does something that smacks me out of the text. In this case, I don't think the science was all that cohesive. In one part, she's talking about how grapes are now a hundred dollars a pound, and the grass is all dead, so how will cattle survive? Fine. That makes sense. But a year after the grapes were a hundred dollars a pound, she's eating ice cream? How? There's no grass. The cows have nothing to eat. Probably if the birds are all dying off, and other animals are affected, the cows would be too. Even if ice cream still existed, wouldn't that be hundreds of dollars too, and not something her family would be able to afford? Were they stockpiling ice cream? That part of things did not feel as well thought out as some of the language.


Rachel Loved all of Jennifer's comments! I did like that the book gave me something to think about (the "what if"s of a paranoid mind), but as a story it fell short.


Rebecca Johnson Yes, YES! You just pointed out everything that bothered me, as well, but much better than I could. I waffled between being horrified at the possibility of this kind of event and total annoyance at the writing decisions.


back to top