Steph Sinclair's Reviews > Abandon
Abandon (Abandon Trilogy, #1)
by Meg Cabot (Goodreads Author)
NO STARS.
I've heard a lot about Meg Cabot's books. And it may surprise people to know that this was actually my first Meg Cabot novel. I'm not completely unfamiliar with her works. One of my favorite movies of all time was adapted from one of her novels-- The Princess Diaries. All that being said, I think I made a huge mistake in having Abandon pop my Cabot novel "cherry".
Insta... love.
Guys, this book has INSTA LOVE!

Deep breaths, Stephanie. Deep. Breaths.
It took me till page 300 to realize why I felt like I wanted to give up reading Abandon several times. And really that's pathetic that I didn't see it. I mean, I really should have peeped that way earlier. But it's not my fault because Abandon was so hard to even follow thanks to Pierce's convoluted ramblings about her pathetic life and her intermittently reminding herself to check yourself before you wreck yourself. This book left me confused, angry and HIGHLY disturbed. Therefore, this review will have major spoilers. Deal with it and let's explore these emotions.
"What Just Happened?"
It's probably not a good sign for a reader to finish your novel and not have a single clue what the point was. Not even an inkling for what you were trying to accomplish. And believe me. I wanted so much to understand and like this book, but the narration ran circles around my wee little mind. The entire first half of the novel has Pierce alluding to several past scenes as if the reader knows what was going on. Pierce would say something like, "Oh and I don't want anything to happen like it did that one time." And I'm sitting here thinking, "Oh yeah? What? What happened?! Tell me already!" I get what Cabot was trying to do, but it didn't work for me. And it definitely didn't need to go on for majority of the book. That was just cruel and wrong. It made me incredibly frustrated. Now, the parts that did manage to make some type of sense were cancelled out by Pierce's sheer stupidity. Saw dust for brains. I really don't want to say it, b-b-but.... BELLA! *gasp* And that, my friends, brings me to the anger.
"What We Have Here is a Failure to Communicate!"
No, what we have here is just a failure. Pierce is one of the worst heroines I've read this year. Now, keep in mind I read both Starcrossed and Fifty Shades of Grey so far, so that's saying something. And not a good something. Moving on. Pierce meets John, a death deity, when she is a just seven-years-old. Later, when she dies at age fifteen, she sees him in the Underworld and he recognizes her too. They have a brief conversation which goes a little something like this:
"Omg, it's so cold and wet here."
"Hey, you wanna get outta here?"
"Sure, whateves."
*poof*

So what does her do? He whisks her away to his bedroom, dresses her in a white dress and gives her the biggest diamond he couldsteal find. Shit you not, that is exactly how it goes down. Pierce, realizing something is not right (Though I'm not sure what gave it away... maybe because he told her she could never leave. Possibly.), throws hot tea in John's face and runs down a staircase that magically transports her back to the living world. *slow blink*
Check yourself before you wreck yourself.
Meanwhile, a year and a half later...
They meet again... in a graveyard, where this poor, unfortunate soul seems to hang out. Of course, that doesn't stop our heroine from asking the all important, universal question: "Why me?" Are you kidding me? But I have to remember, the problem with Pierce is that she's so stupid, she doesn't realize how stupid she is. Instead of running away from the crazed stalker, she apologizes to him for throwing the tea in his face. You know, when she was busy escaping. Pop quiz: What do you get when you mix not-so-bright heroine with a gallon of selfless? Mary-Sue.

So, yeah, the graveyard. Here they are, in the rain, having a "lover's spat" over... well, I'm not exactly sure why they were fighting, but John ends up getting semi-violent, throwing her diamond and demolishing the cemetery gate. Lovely guy. Do you see why this book made me angry? Here we have yet another YA heroine with a controlling, violent male, trying to not be involved with him, and she's apologizing for getting away. Unbelievable. It was at that point where I really didn't think this novel could get any worse. Until, of course, I got to the disturbing part.
The Return of Pedobear (I wish I were joking):
Somehow the cemetery sexton gets involved and Pierce opens up and confides in him. She goes on and on about how he randomly has shown up in her life, how he scares her, how he's a nightmare, how bad things happen when he's around, etc. Do you know what he says to her after that?
Yes, that's right girls. When you are in an abusive relationship, trying to escape, it's not his fault. It's totally your fault for not being sweet enough to him. Because there is no such thing as personal accountability and it is your job to make sure he remains calm enough to not destroy you and everyone you love in a hurricane. But don't worry. He loves you. Gag me.
Check yourself before you wreck yourself.
Excuse me while I rage across my living room.
Ohhhhh... but it gets better. I mentioned before how I didn't recognize the insta-love until page 300. That might seem really strange. And it is. It's mostly because Pierce and John spent so much time trying to "non-avoid" each other and argue that I completely didn't see it. Well, on page 300 John confesses his love to Pierce. His LOVE, people.
Pause.
Love? What love? In all of their encounters (six by my count, including when she was seven), they probably spent no more than thirty minutes together at a given time. And I'm being generous. And then I remember Pierce's dear, sweet granny. The one that took her to the graveyard when she was seven, in hopes that John would run into Pierce and--I hope you're sitting down for this one--fall in love with her. At seven-years-old. That's why he kidnapped her, because he was in love with her. He stalked her because he was in love with her. He got violent when she ran away screaming from him because he was in love with her. He fell in love with her at seven-years-old.
Shall I check myself before I wreck myself now too? HUH?!
Eeny, meeny, miney, moe. Catch a kiddie by the toe...
Then in order to protect her from the Furies, he kidnaps her again (to the bedroom!), changes her clothes (AGAIN) and tells her she must stay there forever with him. But don't worry it's for her protection. Totally legit. And this time he even remembers to lock the door. She smiles. The end.
I know that this is a retelling of Persephone. I get that. But this is in no way, shape or form okay with me. Abandon had everything I hate in a book. Controlling, violent, abusive male. Check. Submissive, passive heroine with very little common sense. Check. Insta-love. check. Mary-sue. Check. Poor plot. Check.
Why? Why do I continue to see the same awful tropes over and over? Why are impressionable, young girls consistently being marketed these types of book? Please, please make it stop. Give them strong, independent heroines, loving love interests, safe and healthy relationships.
Dear Literary gods,
Hear my pleas. Can you do me a solid and provide more alcohol and chocolate if I continue to run into these books?

A finished copy was provided by the publisher for review purposes. Thank you!
More reviews and other fantastical things at Cuddlebuggery Book Blog.
by Meg Cabot (Goodreads Author)
Steph Sinclair's review
bookshelves: young-adult, scholastics, greek-myths, 2012-reads, abusive-boyfriends, all-the-wrong-choices, ahhhhh-my-eyes, can-t-believe-i-finished, creepy-lover, didn-t-care-for-it, disappointment, door-stopper, glad-it-s-over, hated-it-with-a-firey-passion, heroines-i-want-to-shake, i-blame-twilight, kill-it-with-fire, le-sigh, lots-of-fail-going-on-here, no-stars-for-you, no-just-no, rubbish, serve-me-up-insta-love, where-s-my-chocolate, what-kind-of-ending-was-that, why-why-why-did-i-read-it, youve-got-to-be-kidding-me
Jul 15, 12
bookshelves: young-adult, scholastics, greek-myths, 2012-reads, abusive-boyfriends, all-the-wrong-choices, ahhhhh-my-eyes, can-t-believe-i-finished, creepy-lover, didn-t-care-for-it, disappointment, door-stopper, glad-it-s-over, hated-it-with-a-firey-passion, heroines-i-want-to-shake, i-blame-twilight, kill-it-with-fire, le-sigh, lots-of-fail-going-on-here, no-stars-for-you, no-just-no, rubbish, serve-me-up-insta-love, where-s-my-chocolate, what-kind-of-ending-was-that, why-why-why-did-i-read-it, youve-got-to-be-kidding-me
Recommended to Steph by:
Myself *shame*
Recommended for:
No one. Scratch that--Twihards
Read from June 30 to July 12, 2012, read count: 1
NO STARS.
I've heard a lot about Meg Cabot's books. And it may surprise people to know that this was actually my first Meg Cabot novel. I'm not completely unfamiliar with her works. One of my favorite movies of all time was adapted from one of her novels-- The Princess Diaries. All that being said, I think I made a huge mistake in having Abandon pop my Cabot novel "cherry".
Insta... love.
Guys, this book has INSTA LOVE!

Deep breaths, Stephanie. Deep. Breaths.
It took me till page 300 to realize why I felt like I wanted to give up reading Abandon several times. And really that's pathetic that I didn't see it. I mean, I really should have peeped that way earlier. But it's not my fault because Abandon was so hard to even follow thanks to Pierce's convoluted ramblings about her pathetic life and her intermittently reminding herself to check yourself before you wreck yourself. This book left me confused, angry and HIGHLY disturbed. Therefore, this review will have major spoilers. Deal with it and let's explore these emotions.
"What Just Happened?"
It's probably not a good sign for a reader to finish your novel and not have a single clue what the point was. Not even an inkling for what you were trying to accomplish. And believe me. I wanted so much to understand and like this book, but the narration ran circles around my wee little mind. The entire first half of the novel has Pierce alluding to several past scenes as if the reader knows what was going on. Pierce would say something like, "Oh and I don't want anything to happen like it did that one time." And I'm sitting here thinking, "Oh yeah? What? What happened?! Tell me already!" I get what Cabot was trying to do, but it didn't work for me. And it definitely didn't need to go on for majority of the book. That was just cruel and wrong. It made me incredibly frustrated. Now, the parts that did manage to make some type of sense were cancelled out by Pierce's sheer stupidity. Saw dust for brains. I really don't want to say it, b-b-but.... BELLA! *gasp* And that, my friends, brings me to the anger.
"What We Have Here is a Failure to Communicate!"
No, what we have here is just a failure. Pierce is one of the worst heroines I've read this year. Now, keep in mind I read both Starcrossed and Fifty Shades of Grey so far, so that's saying something. And not a good something. Moving on. Pierce meets John, a death deity, when she is a just seven-years-old. Later, when she dies at age fifteen, she sees him in the Underworld and he recognizes her too. They have a brief conversation which goes a little something like this:
"Omg, it's so cold and wet here."
"Hey, you wanna get outta here?"
"Sure, whateves."
*poof*

So what does her do? He whisks her away to his bedroom, dresses her in a white dress and gives her the biggest diamond he could
Check yourself before you wreck yourself.
Meanwhile, a year and a half later...
They meet again... in a graveyard, where this poor, unfortunate soul seems to hang out. Of course, that doesn't stop our heroine from asking the all important, universal question: "Why me?" Are you kidding me? But I have to remember, the problem with Pierce is that she's so stupid, she doesn't realize how stupid she is. Instead of running away from the crazed stalker, she apologizes to him for throwing the tea in his face. You know, when she was busy escaping. Pop quiz: What do you get when you mix not-so-bright heroine with a gallon of selfless? Mary-Sue.

So, yeah, the graveyard. Here they are, in the rain, having a "lover's spat" over... well, I'm not exactly sure why they were fighting, but John ends up getting semi-violent, throwing her diamond and demolishing the cemetery gate. Lovely guy. Do you see why this book made me angry? Here we have yet another YA heroine with a controlling, violent male, trying to not be involved with him, and she's apologizing for getting away. Unbelievable. It was at that point where I really didn't think this novel could get any worse. Until, of course, I got to the disturbing part.
The Return of Pedobear (I wish I were joking):
Somehow the cemetery sexton gets involved and Pierce opens up and confides in him. She goes on and on about how he randomly has shown up in her life, how he scares her, how he's a nightmare, how bad things happen when he's around, etc. Do you know what he says to her after that?
"So if I might make a suggestion for all our sakes, why don't you try"--his brown eyes were pleading--"just being a little sweeter to that boy?"
Yes, that's right girls. When you are in an abusive relationship, trying to escape, it's not his fault. It's totally your fault for not being sweet enough to him. Because there is no such thing as personal accountability and it is your job to make sure he remains calm enough to not destroy you and everyone you love in a hurricane. But don't worry. He loves you. Gag me.
Check yourself before you wreck yourself.
Excuse me while I rage across my living room.
Ohhhhh... but it gets better. I mentioned before how I didn't recognize the insta-love until page 300. That might seem really strange. And it is. It's mostly because Pierce and John spent so much time trying to "non-avoid" each other and argue that I completely didn't see it. Well, on page 300 John confesses his love to Pierce. His LOVE, people.
Pause.
Love? What love? In all of their encounters (six by my count, including when she was seven), they probably spent no more than thirty minutes together at a given time. And I'm being generous. And then I remember Pierce's dear, sweet granny. The one that took her to the graveyard when she was seven, in hopes that John would run into Pierce and--I hope you're sitting down for this one--fall in love with her. At seven-years-old. That's why he kidnapped her, because he was in love with her. He stalked her because he was in love with her. He got violent when she ran away screaming from him because he was in love with her. He fell in love with her at seven-years-old.
Shall I check myself before I wreck myself now too? HUH?!
Eeny, meeny, miney, moe. Catch a kiddie by the toe...
Then in order to protect her from the Furies, he kidnaps her again (to the bedroom!), changes her clothes (AGAIN) and tells her she must stay there forever with him. But don't worry it's for her protection. Totally legit. And this time he even remembers to lock the door. She smiles. The end.
I know that this is a retelling of Persephone. I get that. But this is in no way, shape or form okay with me. Abandon had everything I hate in a book. Controlling, violent, abusive male. Check. Submissive, passive heroine with very little common sense. Check. Insta-love. check. Mary-sue. Check. Poor plot. Check.
Why? Why do I continue to see the same awful tropes over and over? Why are impressionable, young girls consistently being marketed these types of book? Please, please make it stop. Give them strong, independent heroines, loving love interests, safe and healthy relationships.
Dear Literary gods,
Hear my pleas. Can you do me a solid and provide more alcohol and chocolate if I continue to run into these books?

A finished copy was provided by the publisher for review purposes. Thank you!
More reviews and other fantastical things at Cuddlebuggery Book Blog.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Abandon.
sign in »
Reading Progress
| 07/03/2012 | page 99 |
|
33.0% | "This book is filled with convoluted ramblings from Pierce." 2 comments |
| 07/06/2012 | page 151 |
|
50.0% | "I want to abandon this book. DID YOU SEE WHAT I DID THERE?" 8 comments |
| 07/08/2012 | page 205 |
|
67.0% | 1 comment |
| 07/10/2012 | page 218 |
|
72.0% | "Wait. All this time Pierce didn't know she was in the Underworld??? I don't buy that!" 7 comments |
| 07/10/2012 | page 264 |
|
87.0% | "This feels like insta-love. They've had maybe a handful of encounters. Unless a plot twist reveals something in the remaining pages..." 5 comments |
Comments (showing 1-50 of 51) (51 new)
message 1:
by
Anastasia [I'm Wonderstruck...]
(new)
Jun 19, 2012 11:11am
Looking forward to hearing what you think of this one! I do enjoy Meg Cabot, but I have heard that this one's the bad apple in the barrel.
reply
|
flag
*
Cabot didn't research basic Greek Mythology, in fact, she made a huge mess of it. I didn't like this at all.
I forced myself to read this one. It's like an incredibly long prologue. -.- Nothing actually happens, nothing. Uh.
Aleksandra wrote: "I forced myself to read this one. It's like an incredibly long prologue. -.- Nothing actually happens, nothing. Uh."Right?! She just talks and talks and talks. Ugh.
Hahaha, I didn't even understand half of her ramblings I just waited for something to happen and then I was on the last page. Waste of time, unfortunately.
Wow. That's... a rip off! She keeps talking about certain things that's happened like I already know. Grrr...
Anne Nikoline wrote: "I'm excited for your review! I like reviews of awful books."Well, it's definitely going to be one of those reviews, unfortunately.
Yes, that's enough for me. *likes* I don't need more. I'll enjoy reading your review when you finally post it but I don't need more to know I'll love it.EDA: Added a word more. I really should learn to read my own comments before posting.
Perfect. Just perfect. You summed up all my feelings about this book. It was so bad. Meg Cabot's writing quality has taken a serious dip, because I LOVED The Princess Diaries and All-American Girl, warts and all. Then I picked up Abandon. Yeeesh.
awesome review. i shocked me though because her other series are great, mainly the mediator. you should have read that series first
Yeah, this is not my favorite series by Cabot. I suggest her Mediator series. That being said you are not going to get anything deep with any of her series, the good ones can best be described as cute. Nothing earth shattering or amazing in any of them.
Unlike most people I have always enjoyed Meg Cabot's contemporary novels more than her supernatural novels. This shows again why that is the case.Great review, Stephanie.
I love Meg Cabot. I do not, however, love all her books. I recommend the mediator series. She wrote them under a different name and then they were re-released later under Cabot's name. I really liked them and there is no insta-love.
What a shame. Her other books were cute and fluffy, and sometimes good. I don't think I'll be reading this one. Or the entire trilogy.
Awww I liked this book! So sad that you didn't like it. But it's def very paranormal romance-y...if you know what I mean. I just didn't like how the novel takes place over a span of like what...48 hours? Weird. But I just sorta ignored that. lol
I oddly liked this one. Somehow I wasn't bothered by Pierce's all-over-the place thoughts, and just sort of blocked out the romance. After that, it was . . . nice. XD
Thanks for reading this so I don't have to. Maybe if I'm feeling up to being angry or amused, I'll check it out, but at least I would know what I would be getting into.
This one was especially disappointing for me. I grew up reading Cabot. The Mediator Series was a favourite when I was a teen. She was the first author I ever emailed with an incredibly rambling message that ended with, "I LUV UR BOOKS OMG."She's been working on Abandoned on and off for a long time. A VERY long time. I can't even remember how many years ago I read her blog and she first mentioned planning a Persephone book. I swear, I might not have been out of high school yet. So I patiently waited for years for it, was so excited when it finally had a release date, and I read it . . . and oh my goodness, I just couldn't love it.
Anyway, great review Stephanie. You hit on all the points that made this one hard for me to love.
I have one of those love-mostly-hate relationships with Meg Cabot, I keep reading her books hoping it will get better, but it just never does! The runaway dialogue does me in every time. She did write Insatiable in the third person (which really helped with her tendency toward annoying jabber) but that also definitely features not one, but two overbearing and emotionally abusive love interests. It might be time for me to give up Cabot for good.
Thanks everyone! It looks like I really need to check out Cabot's Mediator series since a lot of you guys really enjoyed it. :)@KM, I think I may be starting to grow out of PNR. I keep seeing a lot of the same tropes and story lines. It may be time for me to mix it up and try something new.
@Kyle, I suppose when you take out Pierce's rambling and the romance the story line itself isn't too bad. It did have promise, but it wasn't executed very well.
@Chris, My living room is charred from my rampage. Lol.
@Elizabeth, Aww, that does sound really disappointing! Have you checked out book two? I hear it is much better than Abandon. I'm not sure if I'll check it out though. I have a feeling this series is just not for me.
@Clarissa, That's too bad! I'll have to check out some other works of Cabot's to see what the fuss is about.
Yeah, I didn't like Abandon either. Too bad this was your first Meg Cabot book, she does write some pretty awesome books like Jinx or the Mediator series.
Stephanie Nooooooo! Do not give up on Meg Cabot for this giving in to the hype travesty, maybe she's having an off season and her car's on the fritz and her refridgerator died and her cat had kittens and all them bad boys gotta get fixed, maybe it's like that and so she needed the money (which brakes my little heart, but people gotta do what people gotta do, I guess). Meg Cabot is a pretty good contemporary YA writer, she's not Sarah Dessen, but she does pretty good, you're not mad that you read it, and I just hate that you cut your teeth on this modern pile of garbage fluff, which you should have known would be garbage fluff after reading the synopsis, though the cover is rather pretty. I just don't want you to give up on her for this mess, and if you're looking for a paranormal try Patricia Briggs Mercy Thompsom series, I gave up on YA prn a couple years ago and only venture out when something seems truely exceptional, which I'm still looking for though Vampire Academy and the Morganville series were rather captivating, but I'm more of a fantasy girl.
So sorry to hear that this wasn't a pleasant read for you. I have heard from many reviewers that Abandon didn't deliver and paled in comparison to Cabot's other works. Still, I would recommend trying out some of her other series. Meg Cabot is a talented author, so I'm confused as to why this one wasn't as good.
Sometimes authors have bad books; sometimes with a reason, sometimes without. I don't except to love or even like everything an author puts out. Sometimes an experiment doesn't work. Maybe that's what happened here.
@Holdherbreath, I will try out her other works since they come highly recommended from my friends. I still need to read a Sarah Dessen book (I know! I'm so behind!). I'm more of a fantasy girl too, but there are a few PNR that have really stood out recently like Daughter of Smoke and Bone. @Anastasia, she's a very a popular author and I feel bad that it's taken me this long to read one of her stories. I'll definitely check out something else from her.
@Chris, that's very true. We can't expect to love all of an author's books. Everyone is allowed an "off" book!
When reading Meg, definitely go Mediator or 1800-Where-R-U. Those ladies were real heroines, and Meg did the bad-boy thing in 1800 without the emotional abuse and kidnapping present in Abandon. I'm a big fan of hers, but her recent books have just flopped. Insatiable was a train wreck, but that could be my high expectations talking.
This sounds like a horrible book. John scares me. I've read the Mediator and Princess Diaries series and they were pretty good, so I'm disappointed that this turned out so bad.
It's sad that this had to be your first book from Meg. Her books in the past are better than her books in the present.
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THIS REVIEW!! A year ago, when I finished reading this book, I literally dropped it on the floor and walked away. At the time, I didn't know what made me hurt the book. However, it slowly began to dawn on me; every little thing that was wrong with this book. Your review turned my raging screams of horror and anger into coherent words. For that, I thank you.
Again.
I agree with you wholeheartedly, and I hope this book hasn't turned you off from Meg Cabot because I will tell you that her writing is "hit-or-miss." And this one is definitely a "miss." For a "hit," check out the Airhead trilogy or the Princess Diaries books. Trust me, you will probably not be disappointed.
I just bought this book, along with another (of a different author) and I was checking out reviews to try decide which book I should start out first. Judging from your review (which had me laughing, it was that good!) I'm not sure I should even bother with it. I don't know what possessed me to even buy a Meg Cabot in the first place, because frankly, everytime I pick one up, I have a really ad feeling that I'm going to hate the book. The amazing cover (different to the one on GR) convinced me that I could take the risk. Apparently not... Oh well, I'll read it anyway, if not because its going to be good (I do love Greek Mythology) but because I'll be able to write a review, fueled by my nerds indignation over a terrible read :D Thanks for the heads up and amazing review!!














