John Luiz's Reviews > The Red House
The Red House
by Mark Haddon
by Mark Haddon
I loved The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night Time and A Spot of Bother, so I was very excited once I heard about this novel, and then became utterly disappointed with what a chore this one is to read. It's told in a stream of consciousness style when eight people get together -- an estranged brother and sister and their two families for a week of vacation after the brother and sister's mother died. The point of view shifts from one person's interior thoughts to the next from one paragraph to another, but often the switch occurs within a paragraph. Countless times throughout the book you have to re-read sections to figure out whose point of view it is, and a several times it's impossible to guess. Often there are passages when we get excerpts of what someone is reading -- and you can't always be sure which character it is. While this may be interesting the first few times, it quickly becomes tedious. Then there are riffs like this one:
Marja, Helmand. The sniper far back enough from the window to stop sun flaring on the rifle sight. Crack and kickback. A marine stumbles under the weight of his red buttonhole. Dawn light on wile horses in the Kentii Mountains. Huddershfield, brown sugar bubbling in a tarnished spoon. Turtles drown in oil. The purr of binary, a trillion ones and zeroes. The swill of bonds and futures. Reckitt Benckiser, Smith and Nephew. Rifts and magma chambers. Eyjafjallajokull smoking like a witch's cauldron.
It goes on like this for many more lines -- I'm not sure what it's supposed to be -- descriptions of all that's going on in the world, while these 8 people try to make sense of their lives?
Late in the book, we just get a long list of every item in a novelty shop the characters visit. It was fun when Tim O'Brien used that trick in The Things They Carried because each person's possessions revealed their personality, but I'm not sure what knowing all the curios in this paritcular curio shop does for me or any of the characters.
It's too bad because the characters' dilemmas -- the sister is going crazy over memories of her deformed stillborn baby, her ambition-less husband is having an affair, the brother is learning his wife has secrets and he has to be a better husband -- are all very interesting, not to mention the children's various problems -- the most interesting of which is a teenage girl coming to a slow realization of her sexual orientation. There was enough tension and character development in the book to make it somewhat worthwhile, but you have to have a lot of patience for artsy, fartsy writerly technigues to get through it. (Some readers might like the experimentation, but I obviously am not one of them.)
Marja, Helmand. The sniper far back enough from the window to stop sun flaring on the rifle sight. Crack and kickback. A marine stumbles under the weight of his red buttonhole. Dawn light on wile horses in the Kentii Mountains. Huddershfield, brown sugar bubbling in a tarnished spoon. Turtles drown in oil. The purr of binary, a trillion ones and zeroes. The swill of bonds and futures. Reckitt Benckiser, Smith and Nephew. Rifts and magma chambers. Eyjafjallajokull smoking like a witch's cauldron.
It goes on like this for many more lines -- I'm not sure what it's supposed to be -- descriptions of all that's going on in the world, while these 8 people try to make sense of their lives?
Late in the book, we just get a long list of every item in a novelty shop the characters visit. It was fun when Tim O'Brien used that trick in The Things They Carried because each person's possessions revealed their personality, but I'm not sure what knowing all the curios in this paritcular curio shop does for me or any of the characters.
It's too bad because the characters' dilemmas -- the sister is going crazy over memories of her deformed stillborn baby, her ambition-less husband is having an affair, the brother is learning his wife has secrets and he has to be a better husband -- are all very interesting, not to mention the children's various problems -- the most interesting of which is a teenage girl coming to a slow realization of her sexual orientation. There was enough tension and character development in the book to make it somewhat worthwhile, but you have to have a lot of patience for artsy, fartsy writerly technigues to get through it. (Some readers might like the experimentation, but I obviously am not one of them.)
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Red House.
sign in »
Comments (showing 1-16 of 16) (16 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Glynis
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Jun 22, 2012 01:10pm
How I agree with your review. I loved Spot of Bother but this was a complete disappointment.
reply
|
flag
*
I agree. I almost put the book down without finishing it because it was such unrewarding work to slog through it. None of the characters was particularly appealing and there was little character development, to say nothing of a plot. Usually I pass books on to my friends when I have read them, but I don't know anyone who would want to read this.
Great review. My thoughts exactly. In fact, I LOVEd "Dog in Nighttime", tolerated "Spot of Bother" - which seems to be akin to "Red House". I am listening to it on CDs, and I usually like audio format, but this performer (or the author) make it very difficult to keep picking up who the current narrator is... Still I have great respect for artists who are daring enough to experiment, even if they risk falling on their faces. Like Woody Allen.
The paragraph you give here is just a continuation of the stream of consciousness -- a attempt to capture the flutter of thoughts that might go through someone's head as they leafed idly through a newspaper in the summer of 2010, looking at the headlines and photos with half their attention. It's interesting to see it picked out as a negative example here, because it was one of the places in the book where I thought "Oh, well done!"
Kudos to you for finishing this novel.I completely agree with your "tedious" evaluation. I just couldn't spend any more time on it after the first 100 pages.
Thanks for the informative & accurate review. I only made it to page 15 or so before quitting. I just could not follow the stream of consciousness at all. I never knew who was talking. Reading a book for fun shouldn't be that much work!
I read the first 10 pages and returned the book to the library. Not what I was hoping for from The Curious Incident author. Utterly confusing.
Kerri wrote: "I read the first 10 pages and returned the book to the library. Not what I was hoping for from The Curious Incident author. Utterly confusing."ouch... ouch.. ha i loved the curious incident... maybe he is a one hit wonder.





