Madame X's Reviews > Hearts of Darkness

Hearts of Darkness by Kira Brady

by
5938878
's review
Jun 15, 12

bookshelves: paranormal-urban-fantasy, superior-worldbuilding, weak-heroine, romance-ends-with-hea-or-hfn, meh
Read from June 14 to 15, 2012

I was really, really, pretty irrationally convinced that HEARTS OF DARKNESS would blow my mind. I ended up begging the author for a review copy and then haunting my mailbox while I waited for it to arrive. It had the Dear Author stamp of approval, the Meljean Brooks endorsement, people were comparing it to Karen Marie Moning's Fever series. I was soooooo excited.

Turns out, I didn't really like the book. But having begged the author for a copy, and gotten one - in the mail! at her expense! - I just don't have the heart to exorcise my disappointment in a review. So let's just talk about what the book is, what it isn't, and who's going to like it. Because I bet a lot of people will! It's got many qualities that many other readers will latch onto. Just not me.

So. HEARTS OF DARKNESS is the first in the Deadglass trilogy. It's a paranormal romance (not urban fantasy) with an overarching conflict that will span multiple books but, at least in this first one, ends with an HEA for the heroine and her love interest. It's set in an alternate universe Seattle, where the gate to the Land of the Dead has been cursed and weakened. Ghosts and wraiths have destroyed much of the city's infrastructure while the two biggest factions of supernatural beings - the Kivati (Native American inspired shape changers) vs. the Drekar (Norse-derived dragon-shifters) - have been fighting for control of the city for upwards of a century.

The worldbuilding is pretty great and has tons and tons of potential. The Kivati and the Drekar are culturally distinct and there's potential for something more complex than a "good vs. evil" battle to emerge through the trilogy.

As for the plot and the characters...I think this is where I part ways with the majority of the PNR readers out there. The heroine, Kayla, is a nurse and healer. She wants to think the best of everyone. She shines when she's caregiving, when she's extolling the importance of trust and faith and love, and her acts of heroism are of the self-sacrificing variety - as, for example, in Chapter 2, when she barrels into a duel to the death to body block the losing party and plead for his life.

I'll tell you all a secret: I do not like this type of character. I just don't. But if you do, you will love Kayla.

Now, here's something I didn't understand. It bothered me a lot. Kayla has arrived in Seattle to identify her dead sister's body. The death was attributed to a drug overdose, but Kayla can smell the cover-up a mile away, and she's determined to figure out what really happened (my initial impression was that I was reading the Fever series, if the sisters' deaths had been reversed and smart, together Alina was investigating Mac's death). The sister left a note for Kayla telling her she should give the "key" to "Corbette". While Kayla is examining her sister's body, a bunch of big, aggressive men show up. One of them is Hart, who doesn't explain who sent him. The others, on the other hand, are clear about being Corbette's henchmen. And they really, really don't like Hart.

So Kayla has this dying wish from her sister, which she's determined to carry out...but then she decides the best way to go about it is to enlist Hart's help. Because clearly the guy who's an enemy of Corbette's people will help her deliver the key to Corbette? Hart doesn't flat out say, "By the way, I'm working for Corbette's arch-nemesis, and if I get my hands on this key there's no way in hell I'd deliver it to Corbette, because I'm on the OTHER SIDE," but he shouldn't really have to, should he?

Hart, by the way, is our hero. He's a werewolf and he's enslaved to one of the book's villains, Sven Norgard. The slavery comes with a magical compulsion to obey all of Norgard's orders, so Hart has no choice but to betray Kayla in some pretty serious ways, even though he's falling for her. It's up to Kayla to see through all the horrible things he's forced to do and recognize the good man he could be, to reach out a hand and help him change.

Again, I can see how a lot of people will go bonkers for a redemption story of this kind. And if you're hankering for a book with a werewolf hero who's growly and possessive before his human brain really cues into what's going on, the kind of rough around the edges hardened hero who just wants to protect his woman...Hart is probably right up your alley.

So, hey. There's plenty here for people to like. And I hope the readers who will dig this story find it. But I will briefly cover a couple of issues that turned me off, just to help other people who won't like the book not buy it:

- Kayla's trusting nature also made her unquestioning - as, for example, in her failure to wonder who Hart was loyal to - which puts her in jeopardy repeatedly over the course of the novel. Drove me batty.
- She's handicapped by her ignorance of the supernatural world and while her supernatural powers are potent, they're not offensive. As a result, she's something of a damsel in distress; she needs to be saved and rescued more than once.
- A lot of the villains in this book have "rape" on speed-dial; it's their favorite crime, and all the major female characters in this novel are sexually abused, to various degrees. The abuse is meant to repel and disgust, which it does, but at some point I'd just had my fill of being repelled and disgusted by the villains and their raping.
- On the flipside, Hart and Kayla are overwhelmed by lustful thoughts for one another at the most inappropriate times. I'm sure some people would call their chemistry scorching but, personally, I was gobsmacked when, for example, Kayla and Hart make out in the wake of an emotionally and physically devastating battle.

Alright. That's it. Hopefully I straddled the barbed wire fence between "kind" and "honest". Or at least succeeded in giving credit where credit was due and not being mean. Sigh.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Hearts of Darkness.
sign in »

Reading Progress

06/14/2012 page 32
9.0% "Initial thoughts: (1) like Fever books if Alina were alive and Mac were dead? (2) But more of a Thea Harrison vibe than a KMM vibe (3) How has this girl already forgotten that Hart was an enemy before these other guys were enemies?"
06/14/2012 page 73
21.0% "Some very convenient coincidences here, but I'm interested. I was worried Kayla would just latch onto the unreliable hot guy, but she's out on her own."
06/14/2012 page 75
21.0% ""Buzzed, she would say if she had been drinking" - Kayla keeps ignoring obvious things (like that she's drunk or drugged) because she doesn't expect/want/approve of them...problematic. If I were feeling loopy in an opium den, I'd be worried." 4 comments
06/14/2012 page 122
35.0% "So. First big gory scene. It's emotionally and physically pretty intense - Kayla breaks her ankle in the fighting - and the second the danger has passed she...wants to make out. And her partner, who was SHOT during the fight, is totally on the same page. Ummmmmmmmm."
06/14/2012 page 156
44.0% "Big twist. Kinda gross. I'm having the reaction I'm supposed to have (disgust)."
06/14/2012 page 203
58.0% "How many books have I read now where the heroine is relentlessly pursued by a villain convinced that she, and only she, is the perfect baby mama? Too many. And it's just not a fear/fantasy that I relate to."
06/15/2012 page 245
70.0% "Kayla is kind of judgmental. Not my favorite quality in people, real or fictional."
06/15/2012 page 256
73.0% "Since the first chapter, Brady has been dropping hints about a prophecy to explain why Corbette and Lucia have to get married. Finally we get the actual prophecy...and it has nothing to do with them getting married?" 3 comments

Comments (showing 1-17 of 17) (17 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

message 1: by new_user (new)

new_user Aw, sorry to hear that a book you anticipated so much was a disappointment. I know how that feels. But I think you explained your feelings and the book really well and your review was helpful. The formula you describe (the heroine who is everything sugary and good in the bloody universe and the hero who is instantaneously in love and possessive) isn't my favorite, but it can work with some good writing and other great elements, like the world-building. So maybe I'll give this a shot.


Madame X The writing didn't drive me wild but it's solidly above-average, and I think if you were into the characters it would be easy to get lost in it.

There are also some great little details, like the fact that Hart is colorblind, some steampunky elements and the speakeasy-style bar where all the liquor is served in teapots.


message 3: by new_user (new)

new_user Hm, well, those probably wouldn't affect me one way or the other. Funny enough, I read the teaser from the inside, and Norgard seems more interesting, LOL.


Madame X If you end up reading the book, come back and tell me how much you like him by the end.


message 5: by new_user (new)

new_user Oh, right, you said there were a lot of rapings, didn't you? Yikes. :/


Madame X Dammit. I was trying to be mysterious.


message 7: by new_user (new)

new_user LOL! Well, that saves me some trouble!


Madame X He had real potential, until he became one of the grossest characters I've encountered in a while.


message 9: by new_user (last edited 15. Juni, 22:32 Uhr) (new)

new_user There's a limit to how much you can redeem. I've seen that fail before. Do you think she's going to write about him?


Madame X I really hope not.

But as long as I'm on the subject...I was pretty generally baffled by the author's attitude towards rape and sexual abuse here. I've never read a book that swung between such extremes. She comes pretty close to invoking the idea of rape as fantasy or a fetish, the threat of rape as titillation. Even the hero fantasizes about raping the heroine at one point.

At the same time, the female characters in various ways communicate that rape and sexual abuse are completely inexcusable, irredeemable, traumatizing and horrible crimes.

I've never read a book before where the female characters draw such firm lines in the sand (and there are a ton of examples of it), but the male characters - even the good ones - all have their gross moments, and the plot just keeps veering back toward rape, no matter how many times it's pulled back on track.


message 11: by new_user (new)

new_user Sounds like it veers uncomfortably between fantasy and reality-- the heroine's disgust, as if inserting a surgeon general's warning. The simpler route would have been just refraining from including all that rape. I guess the author couldn't decide which approach she wanted, fantasy or not. Even the hero. Wow. I don't like that as a device to begin with, but when everyone and their mother is raping or getting raped? What in the world... (What kind of world is that, I should say!)


Madame X The deal w/ the hero is as follows (and this is enough of a spoiler that if you are going to read the book, do not read the spoiler) (view spoiler)[ The heroine has been drugged and almost-raped, but the hero saves her. He considers leaving her in an alley, despite the fact that she's completely out of it and mostly naked, but then he decides to take her home. The drug she's on makes her really horny, so she begs the hero to have sex with her, and the hero is very tempted. Classic non-con scenario. But he resists temptation and the next morning the heroine, who under ALL other circumstances is all about trust and not asking questions, actually goes to the hospital for a rape kit because she doesn't believe the hero when he says he didn't touch her. I got whiplash from the change in tone. (hide spoiler)]

The surgeon general's warning is a good example - like a picture of a rotting lung underneath a picture of a smoking cowboy or something, it feels a little schizophrenic.


message 13: by new_user (new)

new_user LOL. Wow... I guess that does sort of mimic the Fever set in a way? KMM exploited rape as a plot device too (a lot) and tried to inject some realism by then making the heroine resentful/righteously outraged? It's a little strange, but fidelity to plot/realism wasn't really that series' strong suit.


message 14: by Galla (new)

Galla Think I'll take this off the TBR. Your concerns sound like they'd be a problem for me, too.


message 15: by Madame X (last edited 16. Juni, 08:13 Uhr) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Madame X The book echoes KMM in a lot of ways - the setup, with Kayla insisting that she'll risk life and limb to find out how her sister died, makes the book feel like a KMM reboot at first.

Personally, I adore the Fever series. So I was happy to see it invoked here, but it definitely feels like it was written by someone who wished KMM had done everything differently. Which, again, will make a lot of people happy.

(view spoiler)[ The spoiler scene that I wrote about above happens pretty early in the novel, actually; maybe the act 1 turning point? The equivalent scene in the Fever books is the beginning of book 4. But it was only satisfying in the Fever books because KMM had written three whole novels where Mac and Barrons deny their attraction to one another. Really, it's the denial and the waiting that I like as much as anything else.

With HEARTS OF DARKNESS, the almost-rape scene was so awful it just killed any interest I had in hanky panky, and then the non-con scenario just slots itself neatly into the usual PNR progression. Just another opportunity for lustful thoughts. (hide spoiler)]



message 16: by new_user (new)

new_user (view spoiler)[Well, really, anytime KMM talked about rape in that series, she made it seem like TEH AWESOMEZ. Death by sex fae, Barrons, etc. I don't know if fetishizing is too strong a word, but they're definitely in the same pool. I get what you mean about the unresolved sexual tension though. I'm not really surprised the non-con was awful. It would have been odd if the rapist was thoughtful or the heroine was like, "And he was awesome!" Maybe the author was trying to make the hero seem like an anti-hero with the lusting, gritty or something, I dunno. (hide spoiler)]


Madame X (view spoiler)[So that's the contrast, right? KMM wrote situations where a person who was so inclined could leave their moral indignation at the door. V'lane can't help his effect on humans. Barrons spends a lot of time and effort fucking Mac sane again. I understood why Mac got mad, but I sure didn't.

Kira Brady is on a totally different wavelength. She writes scenarios that stoke your moral indignation to maximum strength. Like, the almost rape scene I keep mentioning. Kayla doesn't want to go along with Norgard, so he stuffs her full of drugs, and then more drugs. By the time Norgard starts undressing her, Kayla can barely stand up on her own, but she's still aware enough to resist in a sad, completely ineffective way. And meanwhile Hart is sitting there sort of observing for a while, thinking, "Gosh, usually Norgard's women are SO INTO IT by now, they're just really hot for him..."

The whole thing made me want to puke. And, by the way, there's an even worse scene with Norgard later in the book. I think there's more of a Fear Factor vibe than a taboo fantasy vibe here; that kind of rubbernecking, fascinated, can't look away, lean in closer to see how awful it can get sort of appeal that comes from eating cockroaches or, you know, describing very handsome men assaulting helpless women in vivid detail.

(hide spoiler)]



back to top