Megha's Reviews > Wittgenstein's Mistress
Wittgenstein's Mistress
by David Markson
It probably took me less than 20 pages to be enamored with Wittgenstein's Mistress and I turned the last page quite in awe of David Markson.
What we read as the novel is an unbroken series of sentences being typed by a woman, who could be the last animal alive on the earth. One by one she pulls out little threads out of the tangled yarn that her fading and cluttered memory has become. As she unloads her intellectual baggage, she constantly corrects and contradicts herself. We see her struggle to hold on to a train of thought and connect her ideas in some manner. Many of the thoughts are repeated and re-visited, except by the time she comes back to a thought, she may be misrembering what she had said earlier. Different ideas blend into one another, time is bent out of shape, resulting in inaccurate and mixed-up facts. There are times when something which had existed only in her head takes the shape of reality that she completely believes in. She sees some broken bottles by the garbage disposal and imagines how Rembrandt could have painted that. Several pages later she informs us that Rembrandt's painting The Broken Bottles had been painted by him standing by a garbage disposal. Sometimes details from her present or past life project themselves onto learned knowledge of hers and color it with subjectivity. Within these seemingly disorganized sentences, there is an intricate pattern through which Markson brings forth the nature of memory, the close connection between imagination and our concept of reality.
Her meandering thoughts on literature, art history, philosophers etc., perhaps have to do with escapism. Her ramblings are sprinkled with little tidbits of her daily life, but one rarely finds her talking about her past life or the family she once had. Slipping into madness may be the only way she can have an iota of sanity. While her being the last animal alive on the earth is an acceptable premise, there is some hint that this world may be existing only in her head. I see the possibility of this being a coping mechanism for her to deal with her son's death. Perhaps her trying to name the cat she thought she saw at the Colosseum or the tape that makes a cat-like scratching sound, is only an attempt to name the cat that her son used to have but never gave a name to. Cat was all they called it. However the dam does break at times and what it gives away is devastating. Throughout there is a sense of sadness lurking just beneath the words, that one can't shake off. Be it her trying to play tennis with herself, or her putting out cans of cat food for a cat she knows she had only imagined.
In her own rambling and scatterbrained manner, she brings up many a philosophical questions. Though I am not familiar with the related works, one of the themes I did notice was about Wittgenstein's concern with logic and precise use of language. She often discusses questions of This is not a pipe variety and worries about expressing herself accurately. The novel itself could be an example of some such philosophical theme in that the literal meaning of the words you see printed on the paper won't explicitly tell you the meaning of the novel. You have to peel the layer and discover the order in disorder. It is amazing how much Markson says without putting it into words.
Amidst all the trivia, philosophy and a heartbreaking depiction of loneliness, there are several beautiful scenes that leave quite an impression ... her sitting in an automobile watching Stratford-on-Avon fill up with snow, rolling hundreds of tennis balls down the Spanish steps or the transcendental view of the Parthenon in the afternoon Sun.
And the ending - the first 220 pages might be worth reading just to be able to experience those last 20 pages in the light of the rest of the novel.
by David Markson
Megha's review
bookshelves: reviews
Jun 10, 12
bookshelves: reviews
Recommended to Megha by:
Thomas Bernhard, sort of
Read in June, 2012
It probably took me less than 20 pages to be enamored with Wittgenstein's Mistress and I turned the last page quite in awe of David Markson.
What we read as the novel is an unbroken series of sentences being typed by a woman, who could be the last animal alive on the earth. One by one she pulls out little threads out of the tangled yarn that her fading and cluttered memory has become. As she unloads her intellectual baggage, she constantly corrects and contradicts herself. We see her struggle to hold on to a train of thought and connect her ideas in some manner. Many of the thoughts are repeated and re-visited, except by the time she comes back to a thought, she may be misrembering what she had said earlier. Different ideas blend into one another, time is bent out of shape, resulting in inaccurate and mixed-up facts. There are times when something which had existed only in her head takes the shape of reality that she completely believes in. She sees some broken bottles by the garbage disposal and imagines how Rembrandt could have painted that. Several pages later she informs us that Rembrandt's painting The Broken Bottles had been painted by him standing by a garbage disposal. Sometimes details from her present or past life project themselves onto learned knowledge of hers and color it with subjectivity. Within these seemingly disorganized sentences, there is an intricate pattern through which Markson brings forth the nature of memory, the close connection between imagination and our concept of reality.
"What an extraordinary change takes place...when for the first time the fact that everything depends upon how a thing is thought first enters the consciousness, when, in consequence, thought in its absoluteness replaces an apparent reality." - Kierkegaard
Her meandering thoughts on literature, art history, philosophers etc., perhaps have to do with escapism. Her ramblings are sprinkled with little tidbits of her daily life, but one rarely finds her talking about her past life or the family she once had. Slipping into madness may be the only way she can have an iota of sanity. While her being the last animal alive on the earth is an acceptable premise, there is some hint that this world may be existing only in her head. I see the possibility of this being a coping mechanism for her to deal with her son's death. Perhaps her trying to name the cat she thought she saw at the Colosseum or the tape that makes a cat-like scratching sound, is only an attempt to name the cat that her son used to have but never gave a name to. Cat was all they called it. However the dam does break at times and what it gives away is devastating. Throughout there is a sense of sadness lurking just beneath the words, that one can't shake off. Be it her trying to play tennis with herself, or her putting out cans of cat food for a cat she knows she had only imagined.
In her own rambling and scatterbrained manner, she brings up many a philosophical questions. Though I am not familiar with the related works, one of the themes I did notice was about Wittgenstein's concern with logic and precise use of language. She often discusses questions of This is not a pipe variety and worries about expressing herself accurately. The novel itself could be an example of some such philosophical theme in that the literal meaning of the words you see printed on the paper won't explicitly tell you the meaning of the novel. You have to peel the layer and discover the order in disorder. It is amazing how much Markson says without putting it into words.
Amidst all the trivia, philosophy and a heartbreaking depiction of loneliness, there are several beautiful scenes that leave quite an impression ... her sitting in an automobile watching Stratford-on-Avon fill up with snow, rolling hundreds of tennis balls down the Spanish steps or the transcendental view of the Parthenon in the afternoon Sun.
And the ending - the first 220 pages might be worth reading just to be able to experience those last 20 pages in the light of the rest of the novel.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Wittgenstein's Mistress.
sign in »
Reading Progress
| 06/06/2012 | page 52 |
|
20.0% | "I am already seeing plenty of signs of brilliance in here." |
Comments (showing 1-50 of 57) (57 new)
message 1:
by
Ali
(new)
-
added it
Jun 10, 2012 02:57am
Reviews like yours are the reason I don't especially care that you choose not to review books very often. There are those rare people who can pump out good reviews every few days, but even they have some duds now and then. On the ocasions when you review books, they are always great.
reply
|
flag
*
Thanks Ali.It is definitely easier to review a book which elicits a strong response from me, so I tend to review only those. Another reason for infrequent reviewing is that I struggle a bit with expressing myself well in English and that makes reviewing a little less fun.
Awesome stuff. This book has been on my radar for some time. Your fine review has me wanting to read it very soon.
Stephen M wrote: "Awesome stuff. This book has been on my radar for some time. Your fine review has me wanting to read it very soon."For me it was like nothing I have ever read before, quite an experience.
Also, it is written Ian-style - in one or two sentence paragraphs (minus the punny headings).
"I struggle a bit with expressing myself well in English and that makes reviewing a little less fun."Oddly, I know that struggle, a little, anyway. English is my second language (I started to learn it when I was two or three, and made no effort to put any emphasis on learning its nuances besides what I was taking in by osmosis from being around people who spoke nothing but English until I was six or so, which was exacerbated by people who were willing to do everything for me and didn't give me a chance to speak for myself, meaning that until I was six, for all intents and purposes, I didn't have to put any effort into learning English because I didn't need much of it), and though for the most part I'm fine, often I will try to come up with a word or phrase to describe something I'm feeling (this comes up a lot in book reviews), it will take me a minute to think of the right way to express it, and what I end up writing is usually very simple and would be easy for anyone else. When I haven't gotten enough sleep, it feels as if my command of English falls away, at least in writing, and I refrain from writing messages to people because I know they likely won't understand points I'm trying to get across. Whether that's a product of my having learned English so late, or simply the way I operate, I'm not sure.
Amazing review! I've been looking forward to reading this book, it's on deck after I finally finish Gravitys Rainbow. Now I cannot wait! I'll be looking forward to revisiting this when I get to it.
Riku wrote: "welcome back :)"Yes, I am back. I must have read more in last week than I did over last two months.
s.penkevich wrote: "Amazing review! I've been looking forward to reading this book, it's on deck after I finally finish Gravitys Rainbow. Now I cannot wait! I'll be looking forward to revisiting this when I get to it."Oh cool, I look forward to hearing your take on it. The way you have zipping through Gravity's Rainbow, looks like it won't be long before you get to WM.
Megha wrote: "s.penkevich wrote: "Amazing review! I've been looking forward to reading this book, it's on deck after I finally finish Gravitys Rainbow. Now I cannot wait! I'll be looking forward to revisiting th..."I hope not, I'm ready to be done with GR. It's quite good, but yeah, my brain needs to stop aching.
Is there much related to Wittgenstein in it beyond the form? I discovered this book through reading his Collected Writings, so does knowing some of him add to it or is it just in title only?
It adds to the enjoyment if you know the philosophy being explored alongside the obvious, but isn't at all necessary to understanding it.See also:
http://www.theknowe.net/dfwfiles/pdfs...
s.penkevich wrote: "Is there much related to Wittgenstein in it beyond the form? I discovered this book through reading his Collected Writings, so does knowing some of him add to it or is it just in title only? "I wish I could answer that, but I am not familiar with Wittgenstein myself. I had read Tractatus.. last year, but I didn't understand all of it nor do I remember much of it now. I am sure there is a lot about WM that I have missed.
Similarly one of the recurring themes talks about Helen of Troy and some other characters from Greek Mythology. Not having read Iliad or Odyssey, there must be ideas here too that I couldn't figure out.
In any case, I did get 5 stars worth out of WM. So I am not too disappointed.
Ah, thank you both Ali and Megha!I like going into a book knowing what extras I should know in case I want to get some further related reading.
Good to know that it is equally enjoyable without the extended reading (i've done far too much of that lately with Pynchon)
Ali wrote: "It adds to the enjoyment if you know the philosophy being explored alongside the obvious, but isn't at all necessary to understanding it.See also:
http://www.theknowe.net/dfwfiles/pdfs......"
Thanks for the link Ali. It looks like a good supplement.
Wittgenstein knowledge is not required to enjoy this. Although if you're interested, David Foster Wallace has an essay talking about how Wittgenstein's philosophy fits into Markson's vision. Also, if you're interested in Wittgenstein himself, this fascinating biography is well worth reading.
Jimmy wrote: "Wittgenstein knowledge is not required to enjoy this. Although if you're interested, David Foster Wallace has an essay talking about how Wittgenstein's philosophy fits into Markson's vision. Also, ..."Thanks for the pointers, Jimmy. DFW's essay appears to be such a helpful resource, I am glad it exists.
Megha wrote: "Thanks Ali.It is definitely easier to review a book which elicits a strong response from me, so I tend to review only those. Another reason for infrequent reviewing is that I struggle a bit with e..."
Wonderful review. All we see is the victory, not the struggle.
great review, but man, i remember pacing around my crappy austin apartment complex reading this and wishing i'd be sniped. to each their own!
ha ha, most people will settle for throwing the book at a wall rather than being sniped themselves. To each their own!
Megha you express yourself beautifully, "One by one she pulls out little threads out of the tangled yarn that her fading and cluttered memory has become." Wow what a great metaphor. I keep seeing 5 star reviews from my friends for this book and it does seem intriguing, though I'm afraid the loneliness of it might be too much to handle.
B0nnie wrote: "Megha you express yourself beautifully, "One by one she pulls out little threads out of the tangled yarn that her fading and cluttered memory has become." Wow what a great metaphor. I keep seeing 5..."Thanks Bonnie.
I just reread this review after finishing the novel today, and I must agree that the final 20 pages are incredible. I think this book is going to have to be filed under favorites. Sorry, had to gush to someone. How many times have you cited one of her facts to people since reading this? I made the mistake of telling people 'oh so heres this cool art fact', then reading later on that she told me the wrong person at first. Ooops.
I am still in the WM afterglow phase. Most likely I will end up labeling it as a favorite too. For sure, it is one the best books I have read in 2012 so far.It will take a lot of Google search for me to figure out which version of her facts was true. I loved how she talked about little trivial anecdotes, and not the kind of stuff we see in those artists' or philosophers' biographies.
The one I am thinking of right now is where Bertrand Russell took Wittgenstein to see a boat race. And it made Wittgenstein mad at Russell for having wasted his day.
Yeah, I want to know if that is true too! And who really carried around the candy. Or wore whom's boots.Turns out the Erased de Koonings is real:
http://www.boingboing.net/filesroot/e...
s.penkevich wrote: "Turns out the Erased de Koonings is real:http://www.boingboing.net/filesroot/e......"
Neat. And the story about Giotto drawing a perfect circle in freehand is true as well. May be one day I will re-read this with more patience and Google at my fingertips.
Oh good, because I just told someone at work about Giotto today. I believe it went 'This artist Giotto was able to draw a perfect circle freehand, but I can't even cut a straight line with a paper shear'.I looked up references randomly, but it was really killing the flow. I hope to reread it as well.
This may help remember parts to look up though:
http://bigother.com/2010/06/07/wittge...
s.penkevich wrote: "Oh good, because I just told someone at work about Giotto today. I believe it went 'This artist Giotto was able to draw a perfect circle freehand, but I can't even cut a straight line with a paper ..."Markson's concept drew me into the book so quickly that I couldn't look away from the pages long enough to Google anything.
For most books, I stick a post-it tab if I encounter something I may want to look up later. But for this one I would have ended up marking the whole book that way - as the index on the bigother link clearly shows.
s.penkevich wrote: "Or on anything"My worst writing comes out when I have to sign on an electronic pad when making a credit card purchase.
Those are the worst! I stopped even attempting an actual name on those.I need to try post-its. I do a ton of underlining and starring, as well as staring, but I always feel bad that someone else may read my copy some day and have to tiptoe through my ink.
Megha wrote: "I love how half of my update feed is about WM at the moment, thanks to Ian's review reading spree."Sorry, I'm sitting here waiting for a teleconference to start.
Ian wrote: "Megha wrote: "I love how half of my update feed is about WM at the moment, thanks to Ian's review reading spree."Sorry, I'm sitting here waiting for a teleconference to start."
Oh I don't mind at all. In fact, this way I came across a few reviews I hadn't seen before.
Megha wrote: "I love how half of my update feed is about WM at the moment, thanks to Ian's review reading spree."Ha me too, even the Wuthering Heights thread was about WM
s.penkevich wrote: "Oh good, because I just told someone at work about Giotto today"Yeah, a lot of the references are right (i.e. verifiable), a lot are passed-on tidbits and a lot are incorrect; Kate/Helen corrects some of them, but not all. It's really fun figuring it out. For a bunch of pages I was actually convinced van Gogh had indeed painted a still-life of broken bottles, but no. Apparently Flagstad meant to record the Alto Rhapsody, but never did? &c &c
Moira wrote: "s.penkevich wrote: "Oh good, because I just told someone at work about Giotto today"Yeah, a lot of the references are right (i.e. verifiable), a lot are passed-on tidbits and a lot are incorrect;..."
Yeah, in some cases it was possible to tell that it was her imagination playing tricks on her and her statements weren't actually true. With others she kept revising herself, I often couldn't tell which version was true.
I do wish I knew more about Helen-of-Troy's story, so I could figure out in what ways Kate identifies with Helen. Once she even called herself Helen.
s.penkevich wrote: "Those are the worst! I stopped even attempting an actual name on those.I need to try post-its. I do a ton of underlining and starring, as well as staring, but I always feel bad that someone else ..."
I do have two or three used books with margin notes from previous owners. But the writing is barely legible in all of those (different writing each time, of course).
Megha wrote: "I love how half of my update feed is about WM at the moment, thanks to Ian's review reading spree."YES
Megha wrote: "Moira wrote: "s.penkevich wrote: "Oh good, because I just told someone at work about Giotto today"Yeah, a lot of the references are right (i.e. verifiable), a lot are passed-on tidbits and a lot ..."
I wondered that too, about calling herself Helen (especailly when she was only called Kate once right? There was an equal amount then for whatever her name may be). (view spoiler)
Moira wrote: "s.penkevich wrote: "Oh good, because I just told someone at work about Giotto today"Yeah, a lot of the references are right (i.e. verifiable), a lot are passed-on tidbits and a lot are incorrect;..."
Ha yeah, now I wish Van Gogh had in fact painted it. I was up late last night looking up all the paintings she referenced. Someone should release a delux edition with them all at the end.
Also, have either of you found yourself using Kate's speech lately. I just realize that I said 'on my honor' to my boss this morning.
s.penkevich wrote: "Megha wrote: "Moira wrote: "s.penkevich wrote: "Oh good, because I just told someone at work about Giotto today"Yeah, a lot of the references are right (i.e. verifiable), a lot are passed-on tidb..."
I was trying to put it together and that's vaguely the direction I was going in as well - (view spoiler)
I will look forward to these bits in your review.



