Tamara's Reviews > The King's Blood

The King's Blood by Daniel Abraham
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
4748847
's review
May 27, 12

bookshelves: fantasy, economics, medieval, secondary-world, author-male, female-protagonist, male-protagonist, dragons
Read from May 23 to 27, 2012

Better than the first one. Very readable. Still a little tepid somehow. Everyone is much too sensible and believable. It seems to be deliberate - and realistic - that they only inhabit their roles, heroic, selfish or villanious, rather than really being them. The downside is that it does make the whole plot seem like a series of unfortunate misunderstandings that could really be solved if everyone just got together for a nice cup of tea and realized that they'd really all like to be friends. Sometimes it manages to hit a nice tragi-farcical note, other times, it just leaved everything a little bland. Some nice developments at the end though. Looking forwards to the next one.
Likeflag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The King's Blood.
Sign In »

Comments (showing 1-3 of 3) (3 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Horza Got deeply annoyed with all the tough, sensitive, sensible, Whedonesque life-changing advice the protagonists kept dropping on each other - can't really create and sustain pathos when there's so much positive-reinforcement going on.


message 2: by Tamara (new) - added it

Tamara Yes. It's all laid on just a little too thick. And I GET IT, Dawson is a principled reactionary. He likes things in their place. Can we move on?


Horza Other than that, there's good jokes, fun stuff, nice ideas, but I think the big criticism here is that Abraham's been watching too much Firefly (see also: Expanse Trilogy, the) and this is mellowing out what should be a tighter, nastier epic.


back to top