K.'s Reviews > Monstrous Beauty

Monstrous Beauty by Elizabeth Fama

by
2327078
Elizabeth Fama's Monstrous Beauty is a dark and twisted concoction of myth, curses, history, and murder. It is a piercing story about a mermaid who longs to love and a young girl who has discarded any hope of it. I haven't read many sea-folk lore, and so won't pretend to understand this "new" and "original" approach to the mermaid legend. The story is certainly mature, however, daring to be more graphic and seasoned (if you catch my meaning), than most young adult novels in the market. In fact, dare I say that this ranks as highbrow teen fiction in my reader's opinion.

But I digress. I meant to say that I can see the "innovative" appeal in Fama's presentation of merpeople. Innovative is quoted because is it innovative to bring something back to basics? Because that is what I found most intriguing. We have been thoroughly saturated with lies by Disney. Disney has deceived us, people. Not all fairy tales end in "happily ever after". And Fama knows this. Her mermaids reject Ariel. Instead, they go back to the time when a mermaid did not simply lose her voice -- but had her tongue cut out; when a mermaid did not simply grow legs -- but had to endure the sense of walking on knives when standing on her feet; when a mermaid did not marry her prince -- but had to watch the man she loved fall in love with another; and when a mermaid did not go on to live a wonderfully fulfilled life -- but died and turned into sea foam. Fama's sea-folk are beasts of the sea, they are feral and violent acts of butchery come as naturally to them as it does for us to slay a slab of beef. And this isn't even half of what makes this book good.

Fama gives to us Syrenka. A lovely, passionate, powerful, and ferocious creature of yearning. She is ancient and in her long life has suffered imprisonment and loneliness. She is willing -- oh, all too willing! -- to yield all that defines her...for love. But she has lost before and so with this second coming, she determines to make everything right. She is quick but rash, fervent but reckless. And she makes a mistake, and this mistake will tie her, for an undetermined period of time, to Hester, a seventeen year old whose life is turned upside down by a mysterious man who seems to know her -- indeed, know her to her very core.

The divide between Syrenka's chapters and Hester's chapters are distinct. Syrenka's chapters are stunning, where Fama has certainly captured an atmosphere. I only wish Hester's were treated with the same deliberate care. But perhaps it is simply the period -- that Syrenka lived in the romance of 17th century and Hester in the derivativeness of the modern era. Perhaps it is simply our own time's staleness that Fama could not bend her language around (no offense, 21st century, I love you). Because this woman can write. Syrenka and Ezra's conversations seemed, at times (a stretch but I'm flexible), pleasantly imbued with a Godard-esque existentialism...ness. It did, okay! And that's what got me. It was a dialogue I hadn't read the likes of in my on-going quest of young adult literature. I've had beautifully sparse language, and I've had prettily embellished language but not quite this. Why this wasn't a perfect novel through and through is because it eventually subsided to normal dialect...but I remember!

And I suppose the plot itself did not unfold as mysteriously enlightening as it could have. I wasn't quite sure which ones I was supposed to figure out with her help or which ones I just did on my own because I am that clever. Suffice it to say, when certain revelations came to Hester, I was already sitting, hunched, and gesturing my hands that meant "Uh, duh?". But suffice it also to say that I was slightly knocked off my feet by the twists and turns Fama's twisted, unforgiving mind has created. Boy, they were good. They came around the corner, unseen, and I went running the other way. But they got me, the devils!

The romance in this story is well done. It's complicated, which makes describing the premise problematic but worry not. Syrenka and Ezra are not un-reminiscent of Romeo and Juliet and, even, Cathy and Heathcliff. It is a love complicated but so deeply earnest.

And from it erupts this story.

Monstrous Beauty is a must-read. It has character that may not be suited for all readers. But to those who this may win over just yet...

---

An ARC was provided by the publisher.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Monstrous Beauty.
sign in »

Reading Progress

08/07/2012 page 48
16.0% "Not far into the book yet, but this is beautiful." 2 comments
08/08/2012 page 191
63.0% "This is so good, I nearly missed my stop to work this morning. Reading is dangerous." 3 comments

Comments (showing 1-27 of 27) (27 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

Wendy Darling I AM SO GLAD YOU ARE READING THIS.


message 2: by K. (new) - rated it 5 stars

K. Well, you did hint I'd love it :)


Wendy Darling You can't see me because I am whirling around at crazy speeds, giddy with excitement. :D


message 4: by K. (new) - rated it 5 stars

K. HAHAHA!!!


Wendy Darling Eeeeeeeeeeee!! I almost regret having written the review for the blog, because I know yours will be amazing. I can't wait to read it. (And if you couldn't tell, I am thrilled that you loved it, too!)

Subtlety. Thy name is Wendy


message 6: by K. (new) - rated it 5 stars

K. Haha! Let me write it, Wendy! Gosh!


Wendy Darling Oh K., I adore your review. I knew it would be spectacular, but you managed to surprise me still.

I think Sarah was right in that comment she left for you on the blog--I don't think you can possibly be human! Loooove it. Almost as much as I love the book.


message 8: by [deleted user] (new)

This review gave me goosebumps! You and Wendy together have totally convinced me to read it. I WANT to love mermaid books soooo badly, though I rarely do. But this one looks so promising and so "different." djfhsdjhlskdcvlsk


message 9: by K. (new) - rated it 5 stars

K. Well, Wendy, I'm not human. I'm a little fairy :) Anyway, thank you. Coming from you, that's quite something.

And thanks, Bekka! You should really read it! It's not everyone's cup of tea because it is slightly different from what's out there -- not too much but yeah. Hope you love it :)


message 10: by Sarah (saz101) (new)

Sarah (saz101) Ahahahaha! I want to like Wendy's comment about MY comment *is future poster-child for narcissism*
*is also totally OK with that*
:P


message 11: by Sarah (saz101) (new)

Sarah (saz101) AND WHAT DO YOU MEAN DISNEY LIED, YOU NOT-HUMAN THING? O___O

LIES!
:P


message 12: by K. (last edited Aug 15, 2012 03:28am) (new) - rated it 5 stars

K. Oh, uh-oh. Have I burst a bubble? I'm sorry, Sarah.

On a serious note, have you ever read any of the original fairy tales? They're absolutely twisted, macabre and fascinating. Haha... :/


message 13: by Sarah (saz101) (new)

Sarah (saz101) Oh goodness YES. I always felt the HCA Little Mermaid was terribly sad, but it fascinated me so much than the Disney (Uh, about the thong they have in common is, what... The name?)
Sleeping Beauty is messed up though with the rapiness...
My faves were always Bluebeard and Diamonds and Toads ;)


message 14: by K. (last edited Aug 15, 2012 05:19am) (new) - rated it 5 stars

K. Haha, the rapiness. Well, obviously it took more than a chaste kiss to wake her up from her century-sleep :/

I haven't read Diamonds and Toads...never heard of it, actually. Will check that out now.


message 15: by Sarah (saz101) (new)

Sarah (saz101) Seriously. A chaste kiss, a few babies, but obviously it's the man-child that wakes her. Maybe it was the vaginal tearing from delivery? She woke up to bleed out?

*shudders* I so so SO don't get Sleeping Beauty. It's a pretty messed up story for Disney to even CONSIDER adapting, no?

*cough* shutting up no, promise :D
Diamonds and Toads. I just realised today I must have been reading a Charles Perrault collection--never realised Bluebeard was from the same guy.

Oh, and Neil Gaiman references Diamonds and Roses in Instructions (watchitwatchitwatchit)


message 16: by K. (last edited Aug 15, 2012 10:34am) (new) - rated it 5 stars

K. Oh well, I definitely love Neil Gaiman so yes I will, thank you!

I took Children's Lit in university and studied a selection of fairy/cautionary tales and their origins. It was mind-opening -- and disturbing, but so fun -- in a wrong and twisted way ;)

And update: I am loving Speechless, right now. Like, kind of hard core, ya dig?


message 17: by Sarah (saz101) (new)

Sarah (saz101) I'm in love with Neil Gaiman. SO HARD.

I don't know *how* I became fascinated with fairytales--I think it may have been just googling post-Disney, and I grew up reading and re-reading my Mum's copy of an Aesop's Fables collection from when SHE was a kid. I remember having a picture book of the HCA Little Mermaid and being way more fascinated with it than the Disney version, despite being crazy in love with Ariel and Eric (seriously, in year 1 at primary school, every story I wrote was: When I grow up, I want to be a mermaid and live in the ocean. I don't think I got it was meant to be story writing :P).

I just don't get how Sleeping Beauty is a cautionary tale, though! I don't *get* it XD

Also: S P E E C H L E S S! SOOO glad you're loving! I really want to know what you make of Harrington's message and I CAN'T WAIT FOR YOUR REVIEW! Oooh, it's interesting we're speaking about fairy tales, because they're so often moralistic or cautionary tales, and I thought Speechless was, in a fashion, also.


message 18: by K. (last edited Aug 15, 2012 08:16pm) (new) - rated it 5 stars

K. Haha, well I don't know what you mean by "post-Disney", like post your Disney phase? Anyway, I like to research/look up things so that's sort of how I got interested in fairy tales and their "development" or "transition" into the modern era. Plus, like, who wouldn't want to take CHildren's Lit? T'was awesome!

And your story in primary school -- what if the teachers did take them for story writing? Haha! Because obviously, you can never be a mermaid (I say that in gentle tones) :)

And ugh, Speechless! I want to read all night, I kid you not. You know what, maybe I will!


message 19: by Sarah (saz101) (new)

Sarah (saz101) Yeah, as in, been there, done Disney, curious about more :D


Wait... what? I can't? Merma... but...
You know that look Puss in Boots does in Shrek? This one. That's me.

Thank you. Thank you for crushing all my hopes and dreams.

*sniffs*

:P


message 20: by K. (new) - rated it 5 stars

K. Hey, I'm never going to Hogwarts, okay! My dreams lay at my feet, dashed to pieces, then burned to ashes and are now floating over my head dissolving into nothing as the universe laughs and my heart crumbles....I told you, not everything has a happy ending!!

Sigh.


message 21: by Sarah (saz101) (new)

Sarah (saz101) Why you nongo to Hogwarts? Maybe the owl's just delayed? My letter came a few weeks ago!


message 22: by K. (last edited Aug 16, 2012 05:26am) (new) - rated it 5 stars

K. ... ... ...This changes everything.


message 23: by Sarah (saz101) (new)

Sarah (saz101) RIGHT? I heard Errol was helping out. You know what he's like. Probably got into the pumpkin juice before he left and...


message 24: by K. (new) - rated it 5 stars

K. Ugh, just my luck to get him! I'm sure they'd send a back up letter, no? I mean, it has to get to me.


message 25: by Sarah (saz101) (new)

Sarah (saz101) Maybe it's Dobby taking special attention in your case? *refuses to believe Deathly Hallows happened.*

What JK actually wrote was: Voldemort was eating his fish dinner when he choked on a bone. But it was not just any bone, it was a MAGIC bone, and he died good and proper. Everyone but the death eaters lived happily ever after.


message 26: by K. (new) - rated it 5 stars

K. Oh wait what? You didn't like Deathly Hallows? I mean, it wasn't perfect -- for starters, she promised a book the size of the Britannica and DH was definitely not the size of the Britannica -- but how could you not love it for the simple fact that its a Harry Potter book? Haha!

Not just Death Eaters, but Dementors were also obliterated, Dolores Umbridge put to prison (or death, meh) and Snape brought back to life. And Lupin. And Fred...okay.


message 27: by Sarah (saz101) (new)

Sarah (saz101) Ahaha, no, I LOVED DH. I love all things HP, but I'm in epic denial about Dobby and Fred. And Hedwig. And Lupin. And...

HEDWIG IS NOT DEAD.

Her body was never found. I maintain that she found her way back to Harry after the battle of Hogwarts--all the charms and things hiding the tent just got her confused for a bit.


back to top