Jessie (Ageless Pages Reviews)'s Reviews > Starry Nights

Starry Nights by Daisy Whitney
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
4863162
's review
Apr 09, 2012

it was ok
bookshelves: ya-fiction, supernatural-fiction, arc, netgalley-arc, contemporary-fiction, 2013-reads, 2013-reviews, reviewed
Read from July 01 to 02, 2013

Read This Review & More Like It On Ageless Pages Reviews!

I really wanted to love this novel. It has all the things that ostensibly, I should love: Paris? Paintings that come alive? Some interesting uses of mythology? A feminist twist? An author that has been garnering more and more acclaim and attention? But sadly for me, Starry Nights never panned out or impressed me. Honestly, if Starry Nights wasn't such a short, simple, and easily digestible novel, I doubt whether I would have finished. All I can really say is that this is another case of "it's not you, it's me" because I can bet that there will be vast love for it. While I can understand that, I just can't take part in it.

It's not that Starry Nights is a bad book. It's not. It just never really clicked for me. I was utterly indifferent to the characters, the writing was serviceable but nothing to take note of, the romance didn't interest me, and the plot... well, the plot reminded me of a toned down, less suspenseful Darker Still and Night at the Museum. I didn't care about Julien, or Clio, or what kept their love apart. The one character that did generate some interest, Bonheur, isn't around nearly enough to make up for the vacuum of personality that is Julien, or the vapid nature of his love Clio.

When I wasn't bored or disinterested... I was chagrined at the sheer amount of cheese in the love story. It's just badly written, even for a seventeen year old and a girl caught in a painting for 130 years. I mean "She was a revolution and she staged a coup d'etat in my heart"? Really? Really? That line is so full of cheese, it should be a twelve-foot sub. And falling in love with a painting, even before he saw her come to life? My nineties self wants to say: Puh-lease.

As for the promised feminist twist, well, I heard more about it than I saw in the pages of the novel. Suzanne Valadon is important to the plot, and her struggles as a female painter in a male-dominated world are far more interesting than is shown here. And for a novel set in Paris, the city of love and art!, Whitney neglects her setting to focus on the saccharine romance, to the novel's detriment.

I don't have a lot to say about this book, because, for me, it didn't have a lot to offer. A shallow amusement for two hours, I can't say I walked away from Starry Nights feeling much of anything at all. It was more tedious than romantic, silly rather than compelling. I will still seek out other Daisy Whitney novels, but I won't expect so much from them.
5 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Starry Nights.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

07/01/2013 page 115
39.0% "I hate to admit this, but I am rather bored. This is very flat."
07/02/2013 page 235
81.0% "It is a good thing this is a short book, or I would lose all will to finish it.

This is supposed to be so original, but all I see is Darker Still set in modern day France."

Comments (showing 1-2 of 2) (2 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Faye, la Patata Totally agree with everything here! I hated how it was set in a different place (Paris, France) but there wasn't much details about the place. What's the point of putting it in a different place then if you're not going to let it feel like it? :/


Jessie  (Ageless Pages Reviews) Exactly! Especially when it is a book about ART! That is one of the main things Paris is known for. At least incorporate it into the story more!


back to top