faeriemyst's Reviews > The Taken
The Taken (Celestial Blues, #1)
by Vicki Pettersson (Goodreads Author)
by Vicki Pettersson (Goodreads Author)
faeriemyst's review
bookshelves: amazon-vine, urban-fantasy, wtf, disappointing, abandoned-series
Jun 29, 12
bookshelves: amazon-vine, urban-fantasy, wtf, disappointing, abandoned-series
Read from May 27 to June 28, 2012
Even though I'm not especially fond of angels, I decided to try out this new series based on my previous experiences with Vicki Pettersson's work. Sadly, after an intriguing first chapter, any enjoyment I may have expected never came knocking (guess it was too busy knockin' on heaven's door).
Meet one of the two main characters, rockabilly girl Katherine "Kit" Craig. She's an eternally optimistic and peppy reporter whose best friend and co-worker, Nicole, was just murdered while following a lead. Our other MC is a haunted Centurion angel named Griffin Shaw who ushers the newly murdered into the afterlife, otherwise known as the Everlast, while bemoaning the murders of both himself and his wife Evie back in 1960. After making a mistake concerning Nicole, he's been sent back to earth as a human with some angelic senses still intact. Kit and Grif soon meet up and begin investigating the circumstances around Nicole's death, whilst Griffin seeks out any details involving his own.
Problem Number One:
The Cardboard Characters
Character development is supposed to unfold over the course of a book, in this case it actually appeared to deteriorate as the book went on. Kit never developed into anything but one of those annoyingly chipper people you just want to hit with a sledgehammer, while Grif started promisingly enough but then stagnated. They were both very shallow characterizations, and on top of that, I never understood Kit's actions or reactions to just about anything. I never felt her sadness about her best friend's death, whom she rarely gave a passing thought, believed she was smart (by the end, I thought her a dolt), or seem in any way human with nary a rational thought in her head. About mid-way through the book, Grif tells her he's an angel after they kiss, so what does she do? Does she a) run away screaming, b) think he's a few feathers short of a goose and tell him to get hell out of her house and life, or c) have a calm Q&A session followed by giving him a whatfor that consists of "I won't kiss you again" and "you're watching me walk out that door (in her own house) because you can't handle any emotion blah, blah, blah by pretending you're an angel" and then proceed to attend a charity event wherein she acts and converses normally, like nothing happened? If you picked "c" *ding ding ding*, you're a winner! Because as we all know, any sensible guy will pull out the "I'm an angel" trick and expect a woman to believe him. *rolls eyes* Never was it ever crystal clear if Kit thought Grif was either crazy or a liar. It was all a bit hazy, but what can you expect from someone we're never allowed to know? All we discern is she dresses and lives (somewhat) rockabilly, but it's all a veneer to her hollowness inside, which led me to dub her Rockabilly Barbie.

Because that's all she is and nothing more. The only character that I found a little more well-rounded was the secondary character Bridget Moore and the two Centurions introduced close to the end. Everyone else was either forgettably two-dimensional or they were a caricature, a la Caleb Chambers and Paul Raggio.
Problem Number Two:
The Relationship(s)
I'm expected to believe in a possible relationship between Grif and Rockabilly Barbie, err I mean Kit, but there's not much there to believe in. Like the characters, it was shallow with the same descriptions reiterated over and over again. Basically it's a case of telling instead of showing. I felt no love, maybe some attraction, but that's all she wrote. Likewise I never bought that Kit and Paul could ever have gotten far enough to be married, they were just too different. Most people don't do a 180 after they get married, the seed of who Paul really was deep down inside would have already been there and if Kit was even a fraction astute, she should have caught that. All this served was to be a plot point in the book.
Problem Number Three:
The Plot(s)
The main plot involving Nicole's death and Chambers had a "been there, done that" quality to it. The plot didn't shock me or seem like anything new, I've come across the same before or at least plots that were very close, and it wasn't even told in a fresh way. So I wasn't as affected by anything in the book as I probably should have been, partially due to the indifference I felt and the fact that I figured out everything long before the author dropped, what I guess she thought, were informational bombshells.
The book had three major plotlines: Grif and Evie's deaths, Nicole's death/prostitution ring, and Grif and the Pure Anas' philosophical moments. They weren't juggled well at all. Ms. Pettersson should have picked only one and paid more attention to developing that specific plot and the characters. The scenes with Anas (or Anne) especially didn't mesh with the other stories and felt as if the author was overreaching the boundaries set up by the book. One scene in particular was extremely bizarre and pointless to the book as a whole.
Where was the noir? I've seen enough film noirs to know it ain't here.
Problem Number Four:
The Ending
What happened at the end is what I'd expect in a book that's exclusively romance and not in a mystery/urban fantasy hybrid, which made the rushed ending seem even more ridiculous and sappy. It was incredibly unbelievable to the story and didn't seem to set up the next book in any way. Also, one of the plotlines was all but left dangling with no foreshadowing or anything. Poor, poor, poor execution. Don't expound on a storyline if you're not going to finish it up or at least leave it dangling in a way that makes the reader want to come back. All that boring set-up for a completely stupid and cheesy ending. I expected rainbows and unicorns to pop out at any moment.
Overall the book felt more like a rough copy than a finished one and definitely could have used a few more goings over. Several descriptions were rushed and chaotic or simply poorly done so that I was scrambling to picture what was going on. The book is almost 400 pages and it is simply too long. With so many storylines, I'm not sure how they managed to both crawl and have very little action at the same time. I was going to give this two stars because I didn't hate the book, that would imply that it elicited any feelings what-so-ever, but the truth of the matter is that there isn't one thing I really liked about the book either. The only way I'd read a sequel to the bafflingly-named Celestial Blues series is if it featured different leads like the aforementioned Centurions, and even then I'd cautiously dip my toes into the book.
Originally reviewed: June 29
Received: Amazon Vine
Meet one of the two main characters, rockabilly girl Katherine "Kit" Craig. She's an eternally optimistic and peppy reporter whose best friend and co-worker, Nicole, was just murdered while following a lead. Our other MC is a haunted Centurion angel named Griffin Shaw who ushers the newly murdered into the afterlife, otherwise known as the Everlast, while bemoaning the murders of both himself and his wife Evie back in 1960. After making a mistake concerning Nicole, he's been sent back to earth as a human with some angelic senses still intact. Kit and Grif soon meet up and begin investigating the circumstances around Nicole's death, whilst Griffin seeks out any details involving his own.
Problem Number One:
The Cardboard Characters
Character development is supposed to unfold over the course of a book, in this case it actually appeared to deteriorate as the book went on. Kit never developed into anything but one of those annoyingly chipper people you just want to hit with a sledgehammer, while Grif started promisingly enough but then stagnated. They were both very shallow characterizations, and on top of that, I never understood Kit's actions or reactions to just about anything. I never felt her sadness about her best friend's death, whom she rarely gave a passing thought, believed she was smart (by the end, I thought her a dolt), or seem in any way human with nary a rational thought in her head. About mid-way through the book, Grif tells her he's an angel after they kiss, so what does she do? Does she a) run away screaming, b) think he's a few feathers short of a goose and tell him to get hell out of her house and life, or c) have a calm Q&A session followed by giving him a whatfor that consists of "I won't kiss you again" and "you're watching me walk out that door (in her own house) because you can't handle any emotion blah, blah, blah by pretending you're an angel" and then proceed to attend a charity event wherein she acts and converses normally, like nothing happened? If you picked "c" *ding ding ding*, you're a winner! Because as we all know, any sensible guy will pull out the "I'm an angel" trick and expect a woman to believe him. *rolls eyes* Never was it ever crystal clear if Kit thought Grif was either crazy or a liar. It was all a bit hazy, but what can you expect from someone we're never allowed to know? All we discern is she dresses and lives (somewhat) rockabilly, but it's all a veneer to her hollowness inside, which led me to dub her Rockabilly Barbie.

Because that's all she is and nothing more. The only character that I found a little more well-rounded was the secondary character Bridget Moore and the two Centurions introduced close to the end. Everyone else was either forgettably two-dimensional or they were a caricature, a la Caleb Chambers and Paul Raggio.
Problem Number Two:
The Relationship(s)
I'm expected to believe in a possible relationship between Grif and Rockabilly Barbie, err I mean Kit, but there's not much there to believe in. Like the characters, it was shallow with the same descriptions reiterated over and over again. Basically it's a case of telling instead of showing. I felt no love, maybe some attraction, but that's all she wrote. Likewise I never bought that Kit and Paul could ever have gotten far enough to be married, they were just too different. Most people don't do a 180 after they get married, the seed of who Paul really was deep down inside would have already been there and if Kit was even a fraction astute, she should have caught that. All this served was to be a plot point in the book.
Problem Number Three:
The Plot(s)
The main plot involving Nicole's death and Chambers had a "been there, done that" quality to it. The plot didn't shock me or seem like anything new, I've come across the same before or at least plots that were very close, and it wasn't even told in a fresh way. So I wasn't as affected by anything in the book as I probably should have been, partially due to the indifference I felt and the fact that I figured out everything long before the author dropped, what I guess she thought, were informational bombshells.
The book had three major plotlines: Grif and Evie's deaths, Nicole's death/prostitution ring, and Grif and the Pure Anas' philosophical moments. They weren't juggled well at all. Ms. Pettersson should have picked only one and paid more attention to developing that specific plot and the characters. The scenes with Anas (or Anne) especially didn't mesh with the other stories and felt as if the author was overreaching the boundaries set up by the book. One scene in particular was extremely bizarre and pointless to the book as a whole.
Where was the noir? I've seen enough film noirs to know it ain't here.
Problem Number Four:
The Ending
What happened at the end is what I'd expect in a book that's exclusively romance and not in a mystery/urban fantasy hybrid, which made the rushed ending seem even more ridiculous and sappy. It was incredibly unbelievable to the story and didn't seem to set up the next book in any way. Also, one of the plotlines was all but left dangling with no foreshadowing or anything. Poor, poor, poor execution. Don't expound on a storyline if you're not going to finish it up or at least leave it dangling in a way that makes the reader want to come back. All that boring set-up for a completely stupid and cheesy ending. I expected rainbows and unicorns to pop out at any moment.
Overall the book felt more like a rough copy than a finished one and definitely could have used a few more goings over. Several descriptions were rushed and chaotic or simply poorly done so that I was scrambling to picture what was going on. The book is almost 400 pages and it is simply too long. With so many storylines, I'm not sure how they managed to both crawl and have very little action at the same time. I was going to give this two stars because I didn't hate the book, that would imply that it elicited any feelings what-so-ever, but the truth of the matter is that there isn't one thing I really liked about the book either. The only way I'd read a sequel to the bafflingly-named Celestial Blues series is if it featured different leads like the aforementioned Centurions, and even then I'd cautiously dip my toes into the book.
Originally reviewed: June 29
Received: Amazon Vine
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Taken.
sign in »
Reading Progress
| 05/27/2012 | page 61 |
|
14.0% | |
| 05/28/2012 | page 113 |
|
26.0% | "Maybe I'm especially dense, but I could not picture a couple of scenes all that clearly. There are some interesting ideas, and even though I'm not instantly in love with the book, it's been enjoyable, if slightly slow." |
| 06/11/2012 | page 202 |
|
47.0% | "Well that was a weird reaction to finding out Grif's a Centurion. I'm not sure how many people would react the same way." |
| 06/12/2012 | page 226 |
|
52.0% | "I am so confused. What does Kit think of Grif's claim he's an angel, that he's lying or just plain crazy? What I've read isn't unclear. And I don't understand why she didn't kick him out and tell him to never come into contact with her again. Then immediately after, she goes to a charity event with him! Who would do that? I don't get this chick." |
| 06/16/2012 | page 249 |
|
58.0% |
"While not blown away by the book, I had been enjoying it until the last few chapters, where I've become increasingly more frustrated as it's gone along. Now I'm noticing: "Biting her lip, she looked over at Grif." Then on the same page, four paragraphs down: "Biting her lip, Kit shot Grif an apologetic look..." Not only is she biting her lip, which is annoying, it's repetitive too!" 19 comments |
| 06/17/2012 | page 284 |
|
66.0% | "This book is way too long." |
| 06/18/2012 | page 307 |
|
71.0% | "This is like the neverending book. :[" |
| 06/24/2012 | page 348 |
|
81.0% |
"I don't think that last scene served any purpose what so ever in the book. This about sums up my reaction: "
|
| 06/25/2012 | page 397 |
|
92.0% | "Saints be praised, I'm only 20 pages from the end! Woot, woot!! :D" |
Comments (showing 1-11 of 11) (11 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
archdandy
(last edited Jun 29, 2012 01:45pm)
(new)
-
added it
Jun 29, 2012 01:45pm
It's really too bad that this book is really that awful. It could have been awesome if done properly, who wouldn't love a rockabilly noir book?
reply
|
flag
*
That's why I got it: rockabilly + noir should equal total awesome-ness, but all it had was rockabilly thrown in as a costume with no hint of noir to be found. But don't let my review stop you from reading it, you may like it. :)
Damn. I should've known this, from your unbelievably inspired phrase "Rockabilly Barbie," but your review is so much better than mine. You've made me reconsider my review and I'm seriously thinking about knocking off a star (actually, I don't know why I gave it 3 in the first place, as there was really nothing I liked about it and I have no interest in continuing the series) and possibly editing it to be a bit more coherent.
faeriemyst wrote: "That's why I got it: rockabilly + noir should equal total awesome-ness, but all it had was rockabilly thrown in as a costume with no hint of noir to be found. But don't let my review stop you from ..."I might end up reading it at some point but probably not in the near future. I've got two huge bags of books from the library to read, haha. Maybe one day we can hope for a good rockabilly noir book that has actual awesomeness in it. This is kind of a stretch but if you are in to noir fantasy magic books you should check out Hard Magic by Larry Correia. I loved it. I'll recommend it to you on GR instead of linking.
Lolly's wrote: "Damn. I should've known this, from your unbelievably inspired phrase "Rockabilly Barbie," but your review is so much better than mine. You've made me reconsider my review and I'm seriously thinki..."Oh puh-lease, I wouldn't say my review is better, just different in that that we hit upon different points of the book that bothered us respectively (and had a few overlapping views as well). :) Yeah, I'm rather surprised you gave it three stars too. I really doubt I'd consider reading the next book either, and definitely not if it features the same characters. I found your review completely coherent. I think some of my tenses might be off but I really don't feel like messing with it any time soon. :/
Jen wrote: "I might end up reading it at some point but probably not in the near future. I've got two huge bags of books from the library to read, haha. Maybe one day we can hope for a good rockabilly noir book that has actual awesomeness in it. This is kind of a stretch but if you are in to noir fantasy magic books you should check out Hard Magic by Larry Correia. I loved it. I'll recommend it to you on GR instead of linking. "Well good luck with it if you do decide to pick it up some time in the future. :) That's a lot of reading! LOL Thanks for the rec, I am interested in reading Hard Magic eventually.
Yeah, I suppose. I still feel, though, that mine is lacking somehow. I think when I initially reviewed it, I felt I needed to give it the benefit of the doubt--don't ask me why. It's like I feel bad for handing out one and two stars, even when deserved; maybe it's a Sally Field thing. I just want them to like me! LMAO Oh, I have such issues with tenses, so if your review does have a problem (which I can't see), you're in, well, maybe not good, but similar company. ;D Oh, and to eavesdrop on what Jen said, I've passed by that Hard Magic in the bookstore several times, nearly picking it up every time because it looks so intriguing. I think it might just be the noir-rockabilly read we're looking for. :)
That's just the way it goes sometimes with reviewing, I know I've felt like some of my reviews were lacking before. Same with the benefit of a doubt, I'm trying to kick that habit, if I don't like the book, I don't like the book and that's all there is to it. I could not give The Taken two stars, if I did, I'd betray myself, and for once, I didn't care that I was the first to give it one star (and still the only one-star at Amazon) or if I'd get negs or nasty comments. :D I know for a fact I won't be getting to Hard Magic anytime soon since I ended up returning everything I'd borrowed from the library, saving the three books I was in the middle of reading. But at least I have a fresh start with my Vine books. I'm just glad none of the library books were victims of the ceiling collapse since most were in my room; a couple hours beforehand I had actually moved a few away from where it was dripping as a precaution. Pshew! :)
Yup. The problem is, especially now, when I'm reviewing so many books, I don't feel confident enough to go back and edit those reviews I'm not happy with, because I know my memories of the book will have already faded. I'm trying to kick the benefit-of-the-doubt habit. For some books I have an easier time doing so than with others. I think it's because I still haven't developed my thick skin as far as negative responses, especially when I look at some of my positive reviews on Amazon and find that they have "0 out of 1 people found this review helpful" tacked at the top of them. It's discouraging. :( Well, at least you know about Hard Magic, so maybe one of these years you'll be able to get to it. :/ Wow, talk about lucky! Good thing you moved those books; that would've been a heck of a story to tell the library if they'd been under the collapse. ;P
I completely agree. To me, it felt as though her publisher had said to her "Angels are In; you need to write a book about angels, right now" and she banged the book out quickly without really taking care over it.

